SRT System x2

villian
villian Posts: 412
edited August 2014 in Wanted (WTB) Classifieds
Looking for two full SRT Seismic systems. Four main satellite speakers, six powered subs, two center speakers and three Control Centers x2. Lmk if you ever see any! Shoot me a message on here asap!
Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
Post edited by villian on
«1

Comments

  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,603
    edited June 2014
    Hey...if you are gonna dream, dream big ehh?
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited June 2014
    What you are describing is only one SRT Seismic System. Two would be double that.

    How much are you willing to pay?

    One SRT Seismic System originally cost over $22,000
  • ESavinon
    ESavinon Posts: 3,066
    edited June 2014
    For $75,000 I would oblige...
    SRT For Life; SDA Forever!

    The SRT SEISMIC System:
    Four main satellite speakers, six powered subs, two dedicated for LFE channel, two center speakers for over/under screen placement and three Control Centers. Amaze your friends, terrorize your neighbors, seize the audio bragging rights for your state. Go ahead, buy it; you only go around once.
  • villian
    villian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    ESavinon wrote: »
    For $75,000 I would oblige...

    For both? Do you have two?
    What you are describing is only one SRT Seismic System. Two would be double that.

    How much are you willing to pay?

    One SRT Seismic System originally cost over $22,000

    There used to be a PDF document that I had listing all the SRT configs, but I can't seem to find it. Any idea what the spec is for the Seismic, speaker requirement wise?
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,603
    edited June 2014
    villian wrote: »
    For both? Do you have two?

    lol...
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited June 2014
    Here's one full SRT Seismic System. I couldn't even imagine having two Seismic Systems.

    Just one SRT system is enough to give you permanent brain damage:

    scan0001.jpg
  • villian
    villian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    The second one is for a friend who's also looking for one.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • ESavinon
    ESavinon Posts: 3,066
    edited June 2014
    I have a complete seismic system configured in a 7.8 channel with dual centers and sda surrounds
    plus a stereo array. It all equals out to 4 complete 5.2 surround sound sets.
    SRT For Life; SDA Forever!

    The SRT SEISMIC System:
    Four main satellite speakers, six powered subs, two dedicated for LFE channel, two center speakers for over/under screen placement and three Control Centers. Amaze your friends, terrorize your neighbors, seize the audio bragging rights for your state. Go ahead, buy it; you only go around once.
  • agfrost
    agfrost Posts: 2,428
    edited June 2014
    I suspect you'd have better success trying to do business around here if you ditched the signature. SRT systems are hard enough to source without antagonizing the people you're trying to buy from.
    Jay
    SDA 2BTL * Musical Fidelity A5cr amp * Oppo BDP-93 * Modded Adcom GDA-600 DAC * Rythmik F8 (x2)
    Micro Seiki DQ-50 * Hagerman Cornet 2 Phono * A hodgepodge of cabling * Belkin PF60
    Preamp rotation: Krell KSL (SCompRacer recapped) * Manley Shrimp * PS Audio 5.0
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,441
    edited June 2014
    ESavinon wrote: »
    I have a complete seismic system configured in a 7.8 channel with dual centers and sda surrounds
    plus a stereo array. It all equals out to 4 complete 5.2 surround sound sets.

    I would pay to hear that system.....But you're most likely 3 plane trips a bus ride and a cab ride away from me:sad:
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,962
    edited June 2014
    I for one could never understand the infatuation some have with seeking out SRT's. As a former owner, IMHO anyway, the 1.2's with a pair of good subs is the better alternative for both music and movies.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited June 2014
    tonyb wrote: »
    I for one could never understand the infatuation some have with seeking out SRT's. As a former owner, IMHO anyway, the 1.2's with a pair of good subs is the better alternative for both music and movies.

    Mine sound a thousand times better than they did since I had the drivers serviced by Polk.

    I have heard the 1.2's would rather have the SRT.... especially for the price I paid for them with two control boxes and an NOS remote.
  • ken brydson
    ken brydson Posts: 8,759
    edited June 2014
    agfrost wrote: »
    I suspect you'd have better success trying to do business around here if you ditched the signature. SRT systems are hard enough to source without antagonizing the people you're trying to buy from.

    Ya think? :cheesygrin:
  • villian
    villian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    agfrost wrote: »
    I suspect you'd have better success trying to do business around here if you ditched the signature. SRT systems are hard enough to source without antagonizing the people you're trying to buy from.

    I'm not here for the beauty contest, I could care less. You say something idiotic and I'll gladly quote it. If that quote deters you from getting a cool 20k in your pocket, then so be it. Your business isn't worth my money at that point anyways.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • agfrost
    agfrost Posts: 2,428
    edited June 2014
    villian wrote: »
    I'm not here for the beauty contest, I could care less. You say something idiotic and I'll gladly quote it. If that quote deters you from getting a cool 20k in your pocket, then so be it. Your business isn't worth my money at that point anyways.

    You must be a riot at parties.
    Jay
    SDA 2BTL * Musical Fidelity A5cr amp * Oppo BDP-93 * Modded Adcom GDA-600 DAC * Rythmik F8 (x2)
    Micro Seiki DQ-50 * Hagerman Cornet 2 Phono * A hodgepodge of cabling * Belkin PF60
    Preamp rotation: Krell KSL (SCompRacer recapped) * Manley Shrimp * PS Audio 5.0
  • bluecomet
    bluecomet Posts: 1,118
    edited June 2014
    Looking at the Seismic system. What Polk sub woofer speakers are used for the separate low frequency. They are the two stand
    alone subs next to the towers. It's an awesome set up.
    Polk HT system 1: LSIC, LSI25 mains, LSI F/X rears, Lsi F/X rear centers,
    Yamaha RX-V2500 System, Carver A753 3 channel amp.

    Polk HT system 2: , SRT system with f/x 1,000's rear speakers on 7.1 system currently using Onkyo TX-RZ820 receiver, powered by Sunfire Grand Theater amp

    Polk Speaker collection: SDA SRS 1.2tl x 2, SRT system, SDA SRS 2 P/B, SDA 2A, SDA 1C Studio, SDA CRS+, Monitor 7B & 4, SRS 3.1tl, RTA 15tl, LS90, LSI 9
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,441
    edited June 2014
    villian wrote: »
    I'm not here for the beauty contest, I could care less. You say something idiotic and I'll gladly quote it. If that quote deters you from getting a cool 20k in your pocket, then so be it. Your business isn't worth my money at that point anyways.

    sounds like a little rich kid with daddies money...

    Money is not everything and sometimes you need to step back and listen to yourself, Because with that attitude no amount of money will get you what you want....plain and simple..
  • villian
    villian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    sounds like a little rich kid with daddies money...

    Money is not everything and sometimes you need to step back and listen to yourself, Because with that attitude no amount of money will get you what you want....plain and simple..

    You missed the point then.

    1. I'm not a little rich kid with daddies money.
    2. If I have saved the money for something, I'd rather give it to someone who is like minded rather than someone who says idiotic things and never expects to be called out for it. My issue is with BlueFox and DarqueKnight, and last I checked neither of them were selling SRT Systems, so please, get out of my thread unless you have something worthwhile to add..Like an SRT system. Sorry for the harsh tone, but this is a wanted ad, not a general discussion thread. I tired of people poking in to mention stuff like that in BST threads that I either start, or take part in. We're never going to see eye to eye if you don't understand why I have quoted another member in my sig. If that's the case and there's nothing BST related to ad then simply leave me be and move along.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,441
    edited June 2014
    Really WOW:rolleyes:
    The only one missing the point here is you! Nobody will ever see eye to eye in audio its just that kind of hobby.

    you really are THAT dense.....welcome to the BOZO list
  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited June 2014
    bluecomet wrote: »
    Looking at the Seismic system. What Polk sub woofer speakers are used for the separate low frequency. They are the two stand
    alone subs next to the towers. It's an awesome set up.

    I can't tell for sure if you are asking a question here (you didn't use any question marks).

    The two stand-alone subs are two of the SRT subs without the top satellite speakers.

    So the total Seismic System uses 6 SRT subs and 4 satellites.

    The SRT subs are phenomenal.
  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited June 2014
    I'd like to have two regular SRT systems plus two extra subs to make a 10.2 setup like I did with two RT5000s.
  • chefkungfu
    chefkungfu Posts: 638
    edited June 2014
    ^^^^so would I!!!! But I have to settle for my RT3K's for my rear and side surrounds! SRT's for mains and SRT for center. I can use my 2 PSW1200 for subs! The rest of my gear..... goes in different rooms.
    SRT Seismic System with dual PSW1200's
    RT5000 x 2
    RT2000p
    CS400i
    CS350-LS
    LS F/X
    PSW650
    PSW1000 w/Dayton SPA1000
    DSW MicroPro 4000
    Adcom amps
    Pioneer Elite SC-89
    Pioneer PLX-1000 Turntable
    PS4
    XBOX One
    MIT Interconnects
    BJC
  • chefkungfu
    chefkungfu Posts: 638
    edited June 2014
    I'm beyond happy with my setup..... it work's for my room and me!! I like to call it my "Mini Siesmic System" kidding of course, but that's my HT setup.
    SRT Seismic System with dual PSW1200's
    RT5000 x 2
    RT2000p
    CS400i
    CS350-LS
    LS F/X
    PSW650
    PSW1000 w/Dayton SPA1000
    DSW MicroPro 4000
    Adcom amps
    Pioneer Elite SC-89
    Pioneer PLX-1000 Turntable
    PS4
    XBOX One
    MIT Interconnects
    BJC
  • bluecomet
    bluecomet Posts: 1,118
    edited June 2014
    Yes Gate crasher I was asking a question and you answered it. Thanks.
    Polk HT system 1: LSIC, LSI25 mains, LSI F/X rears, Lsi F/X rear centers,
    Yamaha RX-V2500 System, Carver A753 3 channel amp.

    Polk HT system 2: , SRT system with f/x 1,000's rear speakers on 7.1 system currently using Onkyo TX-RZ820 receiver, powered by Sunfire Grand Theater amp

    Polk Speaker collection: SDA SRS 1.2tl x 2, SRT system, SDA SRS 2 P/B, SDA 2A, SDA 1C Studio, SDA CRS+, Monitor 7B & 4, SRS 3.1tl, RTA 15tl, LS90, LSI 9
  • villian
    villian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    bluecomet wrote: »
    Yes Gate crasher I was asking a question and you answered it. Thanks.

    I actually had the same question, so no harm. Gatecrasher answered it well, surprised I never saw that until he explained it.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,552
    edited July 2014

    From the ad,
    The condition is 9/10 because there are some scratches on top of the subs because I had to remove the top speakers by myself. In the move I also broke one of the tongs off a foot of a sub.

    Make that 7/10 at best with a piss poor excuse as they are not that heavy.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited July 2014
    They're not exactly light either (71 lbs.) and take a bit of muscle to place on top of the subs with arms extended.

    Go put 71 lbs. on a barbell and hold it out in front of you with arms fully-extended simulating lowering it while aligning the four pegs in the holes.

    Mine are scratched on top some too (but you can't see it when assembled).
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,552
    edited July 2014
    If you're holding them like that barbell, you're doing it all wrong. Leverage and balance are key. :cool:
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Gatecrasher
    Gatecrasher Posts: 1,550
    edited July 2014
    Yeah right. I'm not a little dude (260 lbs.) and really had to exert myself placing the 71 lb. satellites onto the tops of the SRT subs while aligning the holes perfectly and lowering it. They are pretty massive and awkward to handle. I did it but can easily see how the majority of people out there would have some trouble trying to do it by themselves.

    They are not "light" by any stretch of the imagination.