Confused on DAC

Jhayman

Ok I've been giving some serious thought to getting a stand alone DAC finally..
Thinking about the Teac UD-501 that was recently reviewed here by Pearsall001 Excellent review by the way..
I thought about this DAC before but was told it was not very good by a few members anyway getting off topic here..
I have a Yamaha RX-A2000 Aventage reciever that uses Burr Brown DAC I was never fond of the sound of it.
However I used to stream my music from my computer using a program called Serviio which would show up on my Yamaha networking menu I would select Serviio then navigate to my music and play..
Now I'm having issues with Serviio so I just put a bunch of music on a USB key and directly plugged it in to the Yamaha and I have to say it sounds much better this way..???
Now I have also upgraded to my new McCormack DNA 500 amp so at the risk of sounding like an idiot, is the music actually better from the USB or is it still the same coming from the computer streaming?
And it's just the new amp making it better?

Hopefully I was coherent in that mess..lol
Thanks
Jamie

Moose68Bash

Jamie,

I wish I could help you, but I'm sure there are a lot of other Polkies who know far more about this than I.

In fact, I'm replying to this thread largely because, like you, I'm in a state of confusion about transports, DACs, and digital sources of all kinds right now. I've been doing quite a bit of reading about various transport/DAC combinations, developments in hi-res technology, etc. I'm confused in part because of my own ignorance about all such things, but in part, I'm convinced, because we are now at a technological inflection point. Therefore, it is not at all clear what a wise long-term investment in a DAC should be.

For those of us who are largely into digital sources, it appears that CDs and SACDs are not the way of the future, and that hi-res downloads are the way of the future for audiophile-quality recordings and reproduction.

Hence, I'm looking for a transport and DAC combination that plays "legacy" sources at high quality (that is, plays CDs and SACDs) and that also supports downloads and playback from mass storage devices of new hi-res formats.

To quote you, "Hopefully I was coherent in that mess..lol," but I doubt that I was.

I hope some guys who know more than I can chime in here and give us some insight into this "mess."

Phil

zane77

The Oppo 105 has a great DAC in it and it is also a very good legacy cd, sacd.... player.

tonyb

Jhayman wrote: »

Ok I've been giving some serious thought to getting a stand alone DAC finally..
Thinking about the Teac UD-501 that was recently reviewed here by Pearsall001 Excellent review by the way..
I thought about this DAC before but was told it was not very good by a few members anyway getting off topic here..
I have a Yamaha RX-A2000 Aventage reciever that uses Burr Brown DAC I was never fond of the sound of it.
However I used to stream my music from my computer using a program called Serviio which would show up on my Yamaha networking menu I would select Serviio then navigate to my music and play..
Now I'm having issues with Serviio so I just put a bunch of music on a USB key and directly plugged it in to the Yamaha and I have to say it sounds much better this way..???
Now I have also upgraded to my new McCormack DNA 500 amp so at the risk of sounding like an idiot, is the music actually better from the USB or is it still the same coming from the computer streaming?
And it's just the new amp making it better?

Hopefully I was coherent in that mess..lol
Thanks
Jamie

I may have been one of those who said that dac wasn't for me. I know Phil likes it and Little Joe, as he likes to be called. I only heard it once I believe and that was in another persons rig, not mine, but the sound signature didn't seem to tickle my fancy. It may yours....who knows until you try it. I always encourage people to try stuff regardless of who likes it or doesn't like it. For what that dac offers and at it's price point....you almost have to try it just to see. Many here like the W4S dac 2 with dsd, also not my cup of tea but works well for many others. Lots of choices for sure in dacs. Would love to hear the Chord one of these days too...and if Cary ever comes out with a dsd version of the 100t dac of theirs.

tonyb

Funny...read the same thing about the Clic and M1 dac....which turned me away also. But again, it's about balancing individual traits of gear to get a final sound you like....and finding cables to compliment it all.

I'd say try the Teac...your going to constantly wonder anyway if you don't. Trial and error my friend, coupled with excellent advice from others is the only way to make head way in this hobby of ours.

tonyb

tonyb wrote: »

Funny...read the same thing about the Clic and M1 dac....which turned me away also. But again, it's about balancing individual traits of gear to get a final sound you like....and finding cables to compliment it all.

I'd say try the Teac...your going to constantly wonder anyway if you don't. Trial and error my friend, coupled with excellent advice from others is the only way to make head way in this hobby of ours.

BTW....the USB could have a better implementation in the receiver than the streaming aspect, hard to say. Plus the additional cable. The new amp probably isn't going to change the sound signature your used to from the old amp...both being McCormacks and all. With the addition of a dac though, you can take that receiver out of the equation all together and delegate it to strictly HT use.

mantis

tonyb wrote: »

I may have been one of those who said that dac wasn't for me. I know Phil likes it and Little Joe, as he likes to be called. I only heard it once I believe and that was in another persons rig, not mine, but the sound signature didn't seem to tickle my fancy. It may yours....who knows until you try it. I always encourage people to try stuff regardless of who likes it or doesn't like it. For what that dac offers and at it's price point....you almost have to try it just to see. Many here like the W4S dac 2 with dsd, also not my cup of tea but works well for many others. Lots of choices for sure in dacs. Would love to hear the Chord one of these days too...and if Cary ever comes out with a dsd version of the 100t dac of theirs.

You are in a very small crowd of people who don't like this DAC, I have heard nothing but praises from the Audiophile community. I have a friend of mine who is a diehard Audiophile and judges gear deeply loves this thing. From what I was told, it's incredibly neutral. I can't speak from any experience yet but I'm gonna get my hands on one soon.

11tsteve

on sale at Amazon for $688 right now......

voltz

I had been using the dac in my peachtree decco65 which is :built-in ESS Sabre 9023 24-bit/192kHz digital-to-analog converter (DAC) works with the asynchronous 24-bit/192 USB input to deliver jitter-free digital conversion from computer sources.

but I wanted a SACD player so i got the Marantz 8005 and I'm using its dac now ->rear-panel asynchronous USB input (type for audio playback of stored computer or streaming music files, including high-res files up to 24-bit/192 kHz PCM and 2.8 & 5.6 MHz DSD

but I don't know what DAC it uses, but both sounded awesome to me. but I would think a stand alone dac would be best but I went for the combo. and I'm very happy so far!

Jhayman

Thanks guys for all your thoughts on this DAC, Sounds like Derek really know what he's going after.
As for USB implementation could you elaborate on that a big Tony if you don't mind.
When I talked with my guy about getting a SACD player he said not too as they are going yo be obsolete in a few more years and parts are getting harder to come by as Sony, I believe he said stopped making transports or is going too..
I'm just really curious to find out why my music sounds better through USB directly into my Yamaha..and crappier going through my computer through a program called Serviio then networked to my Yamaha..
Was it Serviio changing the music to my dislike or was it the computer...

voltz

^^^^

I would think that going thru USB your not using your sound card but the other DAC. but using your serviio program on your pc you have to be using your soundcards dac which is where the quality problem is?

Just my quess

Jhayman

Thanks Voltz you're probably correct..
I have a very good sound card in my PC though or at least was 2 years ago..
I believe it's a Creative Labs Titanium HD I'm running from its optical output to my Yamaha and as I type this I wonder am I even using it as I'm connecting to the Yamaha from the PC input via networking so I think I'm actually by passing the optical output....blah blah I'm confused which comes quickly now a days..lol

dragon1952

If you're streaming through the network from PC to Yamaha you are not using your sound card. Also, if one sounds different than the other (USB vs streaming) keep in mind that they both use different interfaces on the Yamaha. The streaming music goes through a network interface before being passed to the DAC and the USB goes through the Yamaha's USB interface. How well each interface is implemented within the AVR is a factor. There is obviously less in the way using the USB stick. The music comes right off of the stick into the receiver. Using the streaming you've got the PC itself and whatever sonic detriments it might add, the player software (Servio) and whatever kind of settings and configuration that uses, you've got cabling and /or wireless transmission, etc. Also, the resolution of the music on the stick might be better than what Servio sends it as.
And yes, the amp itself can make a huge difference.

Jhayman

Thanks dragon1952

I'm guessing Serviio is colouring the music to my dislike where as the straight from USB approach is less congested..
Hopefully the Teac solves that problem..when I purchase it soon I hope.