Magnepan MMG - thinking of buying...

ambiophonics
ambiophonics Posts: 726
edited February 2013 in Speakers
I'm looking for feedback on how the MMG sound. I prefer a speaker with fast tight bass, slightly forward mid-range, and accurate but not overly bright highs. The lower octave or two will be handled by a velodyne sealed 10" servo sub so no worries about the lack of low bass from the MMG's.

I use a 24bit 96khz crosstalk cancellation in my 2-channel setup which works best with speakers that behave like flashlights - a very focused and narrow dispersion pattern. Does anybody know how directional the MMG's are? I'm having trouble finding much info about this. Thanks for any input.
2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
Post edited by ambiophonics on

Comments

  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    They are not like flashlights at all. Maggies are true bipoles, so they put out as much sound to the back as they do to the front. This makes for a very real-to-life presentation. Give them a whirl. Do you have to use your crosstalk thingamajig?
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    I can always remove the crosstalk cancellation box, but it makes things sound so much more accurate that I would prefer to use it. I understand the MMG's put out as much sound to the rear as they do the front but would be more concerned about dispersion to the left and right. I was hoping they would be quite focused and could be toed in slightly, aimed right at the listening position.
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • zingo
    zingo Posts: 11,258
    edited January 2013
    The sweet spot will be small with those speakers, but they do create huge overall sound as mentioned above with the bi-pole design and radiating pattern. Do you have the power to drive planars?
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    I was going to use my NAD 7175PE to start with, and add the carver TFM-35 if needed. I've heard about others using the NAD power envelope amps with smaller Maggies and having good results.
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited January 2013
    Not trying to hijack your thread but i've always wanted to try these as well, maybe in place of my Klipsch in my living room setup. Does anyone have an opinion on if my Nad t752 could adequately drive these?
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    I was hoping they would be quite focused and could be toed in slightly, aimed right at the listening position.

    All Maggies do better toed in. I don't like them toed ALL the way in, but probably like the left speaker aimed 6 inches the left of your head, and the right speaker aimed 6 inches to the right of your head. Maggies have a VERY focused sweet spot while also dispersing a lot of the sound to the left and right. Kind of a best of both worlds, but you gotta spend time to get the perfect placement. They can be laser beams with a lot of toe-in.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    Sounds like they may be what I'm looking for! Now if someone would just buy my DQ-10's and AU-999 we'd be in business.

    I'm surprised no owners have chimed in yet - there has got to be someone on the forum that has a pair of the MMG's?
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited January 2013
    Bought a pair, used them a few times, and sold them.

    They sounded ok. But don't expect any deep bass, large dynamics, or easy setup. With the right room and a sub they can sound fantastic though.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    Face wrote: »
    Bought a pair, used them a few times, and sold them.

    They sounded ok. But don't expect any deep bass, large dynamics, or easy setup. With the right room and a sub they can sound fantastic though.

    The problem with all Maggies is that they have terrible vertical dispersion... although the have excellent horizontal dispersion. This means that to "get" what Maggies you do, your ear needs to be AT LEAST six inches LOWER than the top of the speaker, but preferably a foot or two lower. With tall Maggies this is easy to achieve, but with the MMG you'd practically have to be sitting on the floor, or have the speakers on some sort of riser, to really hear what you're supposed to hear.

    Here's my steadfast advice:

    Get the 1.6's.

    They are the best bang for the buck in the Magnepan world right now, period. They have MUCH better bass than the MMG's, they're tall enough to avoid the vertical dispersion problem of the MMG's, and they just give you a lot more of that Maggie magic for not much more money. You should be able to find a used pair for 800 bucks. Don't worry about the size. Anywhere you could put an MMG, you could put a 1.6.

    I've owned the MG-12's (very similar to the MMG's), the 1.6's, the 1.7's, the 3.6's, and the 3.7's. All awesome, but the 1.6 is a sweet spot for price/performance.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited January 2013
    A friend of mine has the 3.7's with a sub, great sounding setup!
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,201
    edited January 2013
    They all sound good but are difficult to drive and do not play loud. They also will require that sub you have or better. depending on the model , they do produce some decent bass.
    I'm no fan of them but respect how they sound. I also find them to be extremely ugly. Honestly I'd rather have a good pair of Martin Logans if I was going to go with a panel designed speaker.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    mantis wrote: »
    ...and do not play loud...

    ??? I've cranked all my Maggies to uncomfortable levels without issue. :cool:
    ....are difficult to drive...

    I've heard as little as a 100WPC Adcom GFA-545 make a larger pair of Maggies sing... both the 1.6's and 3.6's. The MMG's are cake. People get scared of Maggies because they're nominally rated at 4ohms, but if you look at an impedance graph, you'll see that they are incredibly stable at the 4ohm mark, with no lower dips, whereas most "nominally rated 4ohm" speakers will have dips down to 2ohms. Point being, for a 4ohm speaker, they are an easy load. They are not efficient, that's for sure, but generally that means you just have to turn the volume knob up. A decent 100WPC amp like the 545 will drive them no problem.
    I'd rather have a good pair of Martin Logans if I was going to go with a panel designed speaker.

    Dude, they sound sooo different! Not comparable, IMO. I like Logans a lot, BTW, but it's not practical to lump them into the same category just because they're both flat. The electrostatic transducer used in the Logans has nothing in common with the ribbons and planar driver in the Maggies.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    Hmm - looks like we have some differing experiences...
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited January 2013
    Ditch the cross-talk doo-hickie, in hi-fi, less is more. If you're a "rocker" you are NOT gonna like the MMG.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,005
    edited January 2013
    Ditto what Steve said. Nice sounding but not for all genres of music. Need to augment the lower regions if your a bass head and they are fairly picky on placement. If you can't give them some room to breath, and your room is cluttered with furniture, you won't be happy with these.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • zingo
    zingo Posts: 11,258
    edited January 2013
    You could also try Martin Logan if you are interested in panels. They are easier to drive than Maggies, and tend to run smaller if space is an issue. Both designs have their merits, and both can sound great when driven and set-up properly.
  • dromunds
    dromunds Posts: 10,023
    edited January 2013
    Similar to what Falconcry72 said, I have a pair of 1.4's that I picked up rebuilt for $350 that I enjoy. Good bang for the buck.
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    How difficult were those to rebuild? The only used magnepans I've seen local were very old SMG's - the original ones I believe which from what I've read weren't as good as more recent iterations.
    dromunds wrote: »
    Similar to what Falconcry72 said, I have a pair of 1.4's that I picked up rebuilt for $350 that I enjoy. Good bang for the buck.
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    ...The only used magnepans I've seen local were very old SMG's - the original ones I believe which from what I've read weren't as good as more recent iterations.

    Where are you located? Check audiogon.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited January 2013
    mantis wrote: »
    They all sound good but are difficult to drive and do not play loud. They also will require that sub you have or better. depending on the model , they do produce some decent bass.
    I'm no fan of them but respect how they sound. I also find them to be extremely ugly. Honestly I'd rather have a good pair of Martin Logans if I was going to go with a panel designed speaker.
    The only Maggie I had an issue with volume was the MMG. The larger Maggies have no trouble playing loud with a good amp.

    So you'd rather have a speaker with poor panel/woofer integration over one that sounds better? Are you the one that sets the WAF in your household? :D
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    Hey Steve,

    Ditching the crosstalk cancellation would be like running SDA's without the IC - no fun :biggrin:

    The crosstalk cancellation box is pretty transparent and runs at 24bit 96khz so it shouldn't get in the way of any but the best HD recordings. It actually goes a few steps further than the analog implementation that SDA's use to cancel crosstalk. It will cancel crosstalk just like SDA's but continues recursively, cancelling the cancellation signal etc, down to null. It really focuses the soundstage, gets rid of weird comb filtering in the mid-bass, and allows the reverb to spread out to the sides where it belongs.

    steveinaz wrote: »
    Ditch the cross-talk doo-hickie, in hi-fi, less is more. If you're a "rocker" you are NOT gonna like the MMG.
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,005
    edited January 2013
    Another consideration with the Maggies is if you smoke, have a wood burning fireplace in the room or have cause for high humidity in the room.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    Those are good tips Tony - luckily I'm a non-smoker and the fireplace and humidifier live in the other room.
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,005
    edited January 2013
    Just throwing that out there my friend. Any speaker with ribbons/panels need some carefull considerations before plunking down the coin. Some panels are more durable than others, but the basics still remain.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • 11tsteve
    11tsteve Posts: 1,166
    edited January 2013
    just wanted to throw this in just in case it might be of interest to OP... i am not sure if these are worth looking at or not, but it wouldn't be horribly far if its a good deal.

    http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/ram/ele/3560088013.html
    Polk Lsi9
    N.E.W. A-20 class A 20W
    NAD 1020 completely refurbished
    Keces DA-131 mk.II
    Analysis Plus Copper Oval, Douglass, Morrow SUB3, Huffman Digital
    Paradigm DSP-3100 v.2
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited January 2013
    Those look great - I just don't think I could fit them in the car, or in my listening space. I'm glad to see another Iowa Polkie!

    11tsteve wrote: »
    just wanted to throw this in just in case it might be of interest to OP... i am not sure if these are worth looking at or not, but it wouldn't be horribly far if its a good deal.

    http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/ram/ele/3560088013.html
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server
  • 11tsteve
    11tsteve Posts: 1,166
    edited January 2013
    that's too bad... not even sure if they are desirable or not, but it seems like a reasonable price especially if there is room to negotiate. oh well...


    up in Waterloo.... sitting inside for a snow day. gonna make some speaker stands for my Infinitys....
    Polk Lsi9
    N.E.W. A-20 class A 20W
    NAD 1020 completely refurbished
    Keces DA-131 mk.II
    Analysis Plus Copper Oval, Douglass, Morrow SUB3, Huffman Digital
    Paradigm DSP-3100 v.2
  • dromunds
    dromunds Posts: 10,023
    edited January 2013
    Ambiophonics, you asked about how difficult it was to rebuilt the 1.4's. The previous owner sent them in for factory rebuild. I don't think it was outrageous, and they also put on a new sock and new light oak side rails. Unlike some others that I don't find attractive, they're good looking. I would probably go with Falconcry72's advice and save up for a pair of 1.6's. I picked up the 1.4's because they were pretty local and had already been rebuilt and for that price I didn't see how I could go wrong. I like them. I'm certainly no authority, and like Face and TonyB said don't expect deep bass, so since you already have a sub certainly augment it. I'm running them with a little Dodd tube preamp and a vintage S.A.E. amp and I think they sure have some positive qualities. But I can see where others would have different opinions.
  • Timothy Smith
    Timothy Smith Posts: 764
    edited January 2013
    I owned a set of MMG for a few years. They really needed 200wpc, a good musical sub that could integrate, and lots of fiddling with stands, locations, angles, to sound good.

    They ended up sounding incredibly clear. I noticed details in music that I had never noticed before after hundreds of previous listens. They did lack the midrange "slam" of Polk, A/D/S, Dahlquist, and some other good conventional dynamic speakers.

    The one thing that was most frustrating is that they sounded absolutely great in one sitting position on the couch, but if I moved (literally) one foot to the left, or one foot to the right on the couch, the "magic" collapsed.

    I auditioned some 1.7's and found the same problem, though not quite as bad

    Sold the MMG's a few years ago, and guess what: I want to try some Maggies again.
    Norh ACA-2B tube pre, Sumo Andromeda SS amp. Magneplanar MMG speakers, M&K MX1250 Subwoofer, Pro-Ject RM1.3 Genie TT with Sumiko Pearl MM cart., Keces DAC, Cambridge Audio Azur 640c CD player
  • ambiophonics
    ambiophonics Posts: 726
    edited February 2013
    Update:

    So I finally sold my DQ-10's the other day and then almost immediately found a pair of used MMG's "local" ... Is 4.5 hours one way local? Well since they were about 1/3 the price if new I went for it. As they were located very near he Magnepan factory I swung by and picked up an original shipping carton also. The shipping guy actually made one special for me and then put my speakers back on the pack line and boxed them up for me! All in all it was a fun day.

    I got them setup last night and with some tweaking (a lot of tweaking) they are starting to sound very nice and open. My NAD 7175PE seems to have plenty of power to drive them, in fact they bottom out before it runs out of steam. They integrate nicely with the Velodyne servo sub and work well with the crosstalk box.

    I will have to give them a few weeks to really decide if I like them long term, but so far I'm a happy camper.

    photo.JPG
    2 Channel - Polk SDA-2BTL, Carver TFM-35, Peachtree iDAC, Qobuz streamed via Episode Lynk using bubble UPnP server