Usb shoot out v2.

2»

Comments

  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited January 2013
    Dan, I reported the jack wagon crapping on your post
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited January 2013
    thsmith wrote: »
    Dan, I reported the jack wagon crapping on your post

    ????? "???????? ????" ??????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ? ?? ???????? ???? ????


    JK!:cheesygrin:

    This guy went nuts!
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited January 2013
    pepster wrote: »
    ????? "???????? ????" ??????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ? ?? ???????? ???? ????


    JK!:cheesygrin:

    This guy went nuts!

    Oh yeah, they deleted the spammers response and left me hanging with that ? quote, NICE!:cheesygrin:
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited January 2013
    How could you miss their post, Props to the guys that take this stuff down though.

    I have to believe there is a more efficient way of stopping these turds.
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited January 2013
    thsmith wrote: »
    Dan, I reported the jack wagon crapping on your post
    I don't think I ever got to see what that was about , cool it's gone.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited February 2013
    Any updates Dan ?
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs
  • drgalexo
    drgalexo Posts: 159
    edited February 2013
    Great thread Mantis. I'm currently using Audioquest 0.75m Carbons that cost $119.00 They sound great in my set up and my dealer is going to let me try the Coffee and the Diamonds when I go back for my balanced XLR cables. (I'm comparing some JPS superconductors vs their more expensive ones). Unfortunately I have nothing to compare the Carbons to yet but I am unlikely to spring for the more pricey one's unless there is a clear difference. I find it really difficult to A vs B test most of the cables because of the time it takes to make the changes. Like the balanced cables at less than a meter in length you can spend a fortune on them and I find it hard to be sure I'm really hearing a difference. I will update after the Coffees.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    thsmith wrote: »
    Any updates Dan ?
    I should have Cardas by Wednesday , then I'm gonna start a shootout with them and everything I have here. Audioquest should be in by the end of the month hopefully. They are mad back ordered. We ordered last month.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    drgalexo wrote: »
    Great thread Mantis. I'm currently using Audioquest 0.75m Carbons that cost $119.00 They sound great in my set up and my dealer is going to let me try the Coffee and the Diamonds when I go back for my balanced XLR cables. (I'm comparing some JPS superconductors vs their more expensive ones). Unfortunately I have nothing to compare the Carbons to yet but I am unlikely to spring for the more pricey one's unless there is a clear difference. I find it really difficult to A vs B test most of the cables because of the time it takes to make the changes. Like the balanced cables at less than a meter in length you can spend a fortune on them and I find it hard to be sure I'm really hearing a difference. I will update after the Coffees.
    Sweet man , I'm so looking forward to trying out the Carbon series. It's actually making me want to upgrade all my HDMI's to Carbon and skip right over Chocolate.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • drgalexo
    drgalexo Posts: 159
    edited February 2013
    Yea Mantis it all gets kind of confusing to me, but the Carbons at least are definitely worth comparing to.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    IMG_4930_zpsb2a95742.jpg
    IMG_4931_zpsb93bdc51.jpg
    IMG_4932_zpsbaabcc1f.jpg
    IMG_4933_zps1fbb9754.jpg
    Shootout coming. I gotta run in the Cardas cable as well as get all the other USB's re runned in some so it's a fair vs. Nothing like comparing a cold cable that's been sitting for weeks. The Cardas is brand new so it's never seen the light of day.
    I will say so far I've been running it in the Cardas for about 2 hours and It sounds so damn good. I'm very impressed already. nothing lost coming from my very used now Audioquest Forest USB which I have been using for a month now all the time. It's fully run in as it doesn't get to much down time.
    Man this Cardas Clear sound terrific , WOW , I'm really impressed so far. Damn
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    I picked up the Cardas Clear and compared it to my Audioquest Forest. I want to get a Carbon but they are back ordered so as soon as they come in , I'm getting one along with a cinnamon . I only have a few hours on the Cardas but I hear basically what you heard. The cardas seems to be very neutral and balanced. I don't think it's doing anything wrong like adding or losing anything to the sound. The Forest seems basically the same way. It's very detailed and clear.
    I have about 6 USB cables now that I have been rotating in and out of my system. I have 2 that where DIY from thsmith that has no power conductors. Just the 2 signal and 1 ground. One of them sounds as good as the Forest and the other seems like something is wrong with it. Things seem to come up missing from time to time. I don't like that cable at all as even my cheap Belkin 2.0 high speed sounds more right then it. I don't test that cable no more.
    I'm very pleased with the Cardas Clear and as I felt about all other cables , once you get it right , there is nothing more you can do to improve the sound quality. I'm starting to fully believe that both the Audioquest Forest and Cardas Clear are properly built , are passing the entire signal as it is and not picking up or losing anything along the way. Once the Audioquest Carbon comes in and I run that cable in , if it sounds like the Clear and Forest , I'm gonna stop testing USB cables. That sound be enough of different cables to tell me that the job is getting done to perfection.
    The Carbon is interesting as it has Silver conductors and silver plated connections. This is something I really want to give a full test drive. The Cinnamon only has silver conductors but still uses the same connector the Forest uses in gold plated. I'm not sure how much of a difference that cable will make , I'm gonna test it as well as I hope they come in at the same time so I can run them all in over a solid weekend of testing.
    IMG_4933_zps54565d2b.jpg
    IMG_4934_zps748f4311.jpg
    IMG_4935_zps85d6c90b.jpg
    IMG_4936_zps01b12f0c.jpg
    IMG_4937_zps276308b0.jpg
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    Same results so far. The Cardas and the Audioquest sound exactly the same. I can't tell any differences. I actually end up after a few minutes enjoying the music and not really paying attention to details anymore. When this happens I know I got it right. I know nothing is missing or being added as those kinds of things to me stick out like a sore thumb.
    The built quality of the Cardas Clear is top notch. The time I have spent with the Crosslink speaker cables also tells me they are passing the signal to perfection. They are Cardas entry level speaker cables and they are of the highest quality at that level. Usually my Audioquest FLX 14/2 and FLX 14/4 hand built by me show flaws in others at this gauge and length( I run 8 to 10 foot) . The Crosslinks don't change anything when I swap out the Audioquest and put in the Crosslinks. I could be satisfied with either cable powering my system. Not to mention I have FLX14/2 running all my speakers in my system which will include Front Heights today( I got a pair of Gem XL's on the way that I'm gonna dig into Front Height's with and I'm also gonna bring home a pair of Def Tech speaker brackets so I can angle them down and set them up properly).

    I'm still gonna test the Cinnamon and Carbon when they finally come in. Audioquest has been selling the crap out of USB cables and got very back ordered. It's also very refreshing to deep into another wire company that holds their products to the highest standards like Cardas does. Over the years I have been installing them , I never really got a WOW factor out of them. What I'm understanding now is they do their job and don't coor up the sound like most other companies do. They are fantastic in everything they do and do it to perfection. I'm not trying to rewire my entire rig or anything with Cardas as I don't find them to be superior in any way over Audioquest. I do however if lets say Audioquest goes out of business , I have a very solid fall back company for my wire needs.

    Kimber Kable makes a USB cable and if we start stocking them , I'll take one home and test drive it. But as with Cardas and Audioquest , Kimber also pays extreme attention to all their cable builds.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited February 2013
    I purchased a 16 foot Belkin Gold Reference cable for somewhere around $35 at Micro Center after reading very favorable reviews in TAS and Stereophile. The sound is definitely high-end and lends credence to Mantis's conclusion that a well-made USB cable will sound the same as another well-made cable. I only ever compared the Belkin to a WireWorld Silver Starlight, but they both sound the same to me.

    I prefer the Belkin because it is longer which allows me to place the computer in a more attractive location in my listening space . . . not to mention it costs far less.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,593
    edited February 2013
    mantis wrote: »
    Sweet man , I'm so looking forward to trying out the Carbon series. It's actually making me want to upgrade all my HDMI's to Carbon and skip right over Chocolate.

    If you do Dan, let me know, I might be interested in buying your Cinnamons off you :smile:....
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    SolidSqual wrote: »
    I purchased a 16 foot Belkin Gold Reference cable for somewhere around $35 at Micro Center after reading very favorable reviews in TAS and Stereophile. The sound is definitely high-end and lends credence to Mantis's conclusion that a well-made USB cable will sound the same as another well-made cable. I only ever compared the Belkin to a WireWorld Silver Starlight, but they both sound the same to me.

    I prefer the Belkin because it is longer which allows me to place the computer in a more attractive location in my listening space . . . not to mention it costs far less.
    It basically takes me back to the time when Optical vs Coax was the hot topic in wire shootouts and both camps had strong arguments why one was better then the other. I also think wire companies take cables to far , they go well past making a correctly build sonically perfect conductor and go as far as someone is willing to pay for it no matter what.
    If I could find some differences in high end USB cables , I will report my findings. but honestly I just about finished with this as the Cardas Clear costs a lot more then the Audioquest Forest but IMO there is no sonic benefits. IF I could hear better anything , then I could say yeah it's worth the extra cost as your getting better sound quality. But I haven't found it. I never found it in any Digital cables in the past except when I upgraded to Audioquest Cinnamon HDMI cables from Binary. I chalk that up to maybe poor built quality and materials , or improperly terminated connectors like the one Thsmith provided for me and I later found out he had to re solder the exact same cable I felt didn't sound right or the same as all the other USB cables I tested.
    If you think about the entire chain , you gotta consider the materials used in your source , in my case my Macbook Pro. It has very good build quality but the output USB's might be made of a lesser quality material , maybe a blend of copper something. I'd actually like to know. Then on my DAC side , who really knows what metals they used to construct the USB input.
    Now lets say for argument sake , it's pure copper , with buying a Silver made conductor , where do I benefit from the higher quality material at 1 meter in length? The Carbon is Silver plated connectors with 5% Silver plated long grain Copper conductors. The Forrest uses the same exact conductors with no silver plating and uses gold plated connectors. What will the added Silver give me?
    I also want to do a HDMI shootout with Forest and Cinnamon then Carbon and see or hear any differences there. These are the current cables used the most and IF I can't find reasons to own higher end models like the Carbon , I'm willing to open the wallet. If I can't find any reasons other then Silver is a better conductor then Copper , I'm gonna close this chapter in the quest for perfection in my given system.

    Just as a side note , I fully understand every system has sonic limitations , which I'm considering when talking about given cables. If any of you are using higher end gear then I am , you might be able to experience something my system may not be able to unveil. I do however have higher end gear at my shop and have tried a few USB's there with no sonic gains. I have a few more steps to take and I'm willing to take them.

    Any and all opinions are very welcome.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • sodablue
    sodablue Posts: 24
    edited February 2013
    Really the only thing you can review on digital cables is the build quality. Does it fit snuggly into the port, does it fall out easily, is it flexible, etc.

    They're all going to sound the same, because it's a digital signal. It either works, or it doesn't.
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited February 2013
    sodablue wrote: »
    Really the only thing you can review on digital cables is the build quality. Does it fit snuggly into the port, does it fall out easily, is it flexible, etc.

    They're all going to sound the same, because it's a digital signal. It either works, or it doesn't.

    I think it's more like it either works to the standard or sounds worse. I've had coax spdif cables that were not made as well as others which definitely affected the signal.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,593
    edited February 2013
    mantis wrote: »
    I also want to do a HDMI shootout with Forest and Cinnamon then Carbon and see or hear any differences there. These are the current cables used the most and IF I can't find reasons to own higher end models like the Carbon , I'm willing to open the wallet. If I can't find any reasons other then Silver is a better conductor then Copper , I'm gonna close this chapter in the quest for perfection in my given system.

    When you do a HDMI shootout, for giggles also include either the Forest or Pearl so you can see if you can tell the difference between their bottom of the line HDMI connectors v their higher end ones. Just a thought.

    Might let you know it if truly was just a bad HDMI cable you had originally in your "Upgraded HDMI cables, things sound better, how is this so?" thread...
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited February 2013
    When you do a HDMI shootout, for giggles also include either the Forest or Pearl so you can see if you can tell the difference between their bottom of the line HDMI connectors v their higher end ones. Just a thought.

    Might let you know it if truly was just a bad HDMI cable you had originally in your "Upgraded HDMI cables, things sound better, how is this so?" thread...
    I believe without testing this exact theory , The HDMI cables I was using was introducing Jitter , or was poorly constructed. I'm willing to bet at the short lengths I use , all Audioquest cables will perform exactly the same over HDMI. My longest cable is a 3m to the TV. All of my system cables are .6m ,1m , 1.5m and 2m in lengths. Basically Audioquest constructs all of their cables with correct geometry . The only benefits you get with the higher end models is better quality materials. I also believe in HDMI you will experience better performance is over longer runs.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.