THINGS in the signal path?

NJPOLKER
NJPOLKER Posts: 3,474
edited January 2013 in 2 Channel Audio
I plan to employ :mrgreen:/use different IC's and speaker cables. What I currently use is pathetic. Once upon a time I employed/used MIT S3's but sold them to a great member here, yeah I'm a dope.

If less is better why have a box of magic like MIT and a few other use in in the signal path? I understand it's all in what I hear but do not have ability to really try out different cable combinations.

I am thinking about buying two sets of IC's and hopefully getting back a set of Morrow Audio speaker cables from my friend here at Polk. Another mistake I made by selling stuff :redface:

Never sell always buy :loneranger: Be a hoarder :lol:

Advice is always appreciated

Thanks
Post edited by NJPOLKER on

Comments

  • zingo
    zingo Posts: 11,258
    edited January 2013
    Interesting thought on the less is more, but more cables is better... Never considered that...

    I think the philosophy of less is more usual is a guide toward what might sound better given generic equipment, but we all can thank of at least one incredibly complex piece that sounds great. As always, trust your ears, and your first mistake was selling things... :)
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    The less is more crowd usually has higher end gear, better source and better recordings. If you start with quality then their is no reason to keep adding things in the signal path. Aside from that, adding things in the signal path is just a coloration of the sound to ones own tastes no matter the level of gear. Nothing wrong with that, as long as you like what you hear, who cares ?
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    I think njpolker is just looking for recommendations on "conventional" IC's that rival his old MIT S3's in terms of sound quality.

    What are you using now?

    How about the Nordost Heimdalls? They get good reviews, but they're expensive.

    How about Signal Cable Analog 2's or Silver Resolutions?
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    Look for some audio metallurgey GA-0's or AG-0's, I dig mine and feel no need to look further. IMHO, when any product makes you stop looking thats a sign of a good product.

    Matter of just finding your synergy within your system, kiss alot of frogs before your Prince shows up.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    tonyb wrote: »
    ...Matter of just finding your synergy within your system, kiss alot of frogs before your Prince shows up.

    Man, I've been A/B'ing my MIT S3 speaker cables against a pair of Signal Cable Ultra speaker cables, hoping that I'd like the Ultras as much as the S3's so I could sell the S3's and use the money elsewhere... but so far the S3's are winning. My girlfriend could even tell the difference in a blind test, and she described the differences exactly how I would have.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • wolfsongaudio
    wolfsongaudio Posts: 11
    edited January 2013
    Have you considered the DIY route? There are a host of plans out there to build your own ICs and the cost is very low.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    Man, I've been A/B'ing my MIT S3 speaker cables against a pair of Signal Cable Ultra speaker cables, hoping that I'd like the Ultras as much as the S3's so I could sell the S3's and use the money elsewhere... but so far the S3's are winning. My girlfriend could even tell the difference in a blind test, and she described the differences exactly how I would have.

    I hear ya man, in all fairness, you weren't really expecting the Signal cables to top the S3's were you ? Apples and oranges in my book, 2 different classes of cable. As long as the S3's are to your liking, why switch ? You may have to go the used route to better them. More cable makers out there than you can shake a stick at, something is bound to tickle your fancy.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    tonyb wrote: »
    ...As long as the S3's are to your liking, why switch ? You may have to go the used route to better them. More cable makers out there than you can shake a stick at, something is bound to tickle your fancy.

    Actually I just pulled the trigger on some Morrows. (2) pairs of IC's and (1) pair of speaker cables. I am currently using Signal Cable Analog 2 IC's along with the MIT S3 speaker cables. I'm hoping that going with all Morrows will be an improvement over the MIT/SC combo, and selling the MITs will pay for all the Morrows. Then I can move the Analog 2's into a different rig.

    We'll see!
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited January 2013
    NJPOLKER wrote: »
    I plan to employ :mrgreen:/use different IC's and speaker cables. What I currently use is pathetic. Once upon a time I employed/used MIT S3's but sold them to a great member here, yeah I'm a dope.

    If less is better why have a box of magic like MIT and a few other use in in the signal path?

    I'm big into the "less is more" theory and have high end equipment. Why the box of magic? Because it is magic!
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    madmax wrote: »
    I'm big into the "less is more" theory ...QUOTE]

    Maybe so....but the wife begs to differ.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • NJPOLKER
    NJPOLKER Posts: 3,474
    edited January 2013
    Please let us know about your findings on the Morrow Audio Cables. Which ones did you buy?

    I have been giving thought to trying the IC's.


    Actually I just pulled the trigger on some Morrows. (2) pairs of IC's and (1) pair of speaker cables. I am currently using Signal Cable Analog 2 IC's along with the MIT S3 speaker cables. I'm hoping that going with all Morrows will be an improvement over the MIT/SC combo, and selling the MITs will pay for all the Morrows. Then I can move the Analog 2's into a different rig.

    We'll see!
  • NJPOLKER
    NJPOLKER Posts: 3,474
    edited January 2013
    Currently running a DH Labs from my Musical Fidelity A5 CDP to my Anthem PRE2L tube preamp and a old Monster cable from my Belles 350a amp to preamp. Soooooooo no matter which way I go it should be a nice upgrade. I have been using either a Audioquest Mammoth or Type 4 speaker cable to hook up my Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus.

    Ya think I need to address my IC's?????????????????????????????????????????
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited January 2013
    newampdark.jpg

    FWIW, less things in one's signal path between the "interconnects" and the speaker cables is considered by many of us (OK... by some of us, anyway) to be the best thing of all.

    Not too many things between "in" and "out" on a "Simple 2A3" amp...

    simple2A3belowdeckscropped_zpsee9b13b5.jpg
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    NJPOLKER wrote: »
    Please let us know about your findings on the Morrow Audio Cables. Which ones did you buy?

    I have been giving thought to trying the IC's.

    Will do. I got the MA3 balanced interconnects and SP3 speaker cables. They have a 60 day return policy on all new cables, so no harm in tryin'em out! They also have a good selection on used cables at deep discounts that people turn in for the trade-up program. Pretty cool stuff. And Mike Morrow is an excellent man to do business with. He really went out of his way for me.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    NJPOLKER wrote: »
    ...and hopefully getting back a set of Morrow Audio speaker cables...

    Which Morrow Audio speaker cables did you have? I guess you liked them if you're trying to get them back!
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited January 2013
    Sometimes it can be quite confusing---sort of a which came first, the chicken or the egg scenario. Put new wires in, and the system sounds different; now, does it sound different because of something the wire is doing, OR am I finally correctly hearing what my upstream components sound like?

    Think on that for awhile.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited January 2013
    steveinaz wrote: »
    Sometimes it can be quite confusing---sort of a which came first, the chicken or the egg scenario. Put new wires in, and the system sounds different; now, does it sound different because of something the wire is doing, OR am I finally correctly hearing what my upstream components sound like?

    Think on that for awhile.

    Either way, in this hypothesis, the wire is doing something. It is either changing the signal, or allowing the signal to pass unchanged between components. To me, the second case is the preferred scenario.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited January 2013
    BlueFox wrote: »
    Either way, in this hypothesis, the wire is doing something. It is either changing the signal, or allowing the signal to pass unchanged between components. To me, the second case is the preferred scenario.

    Right, so let's say you put new cables in, and your system sounds worse... it could be because your new cables are letting you hear problems in your components that your old cables were hiding, or it could be because your new cables are worse. How do you know?

    I guess one answer is that it doesn't matter, just use the ones that have better synergy with your system... but for me, I want to know the real answer so I can replace the offending component.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • mufsoman
    mufsoman Posts: 631
    edited January 2013
    Falconcry72 - keep us up to date with those Morrow IC's and speaker cables (probably in a separate thread). I too have an interest in how they compare. I have MA2 IC's and have been considering upgrading to maybe MA4 for IC's and speaks. Thanks
    Parasound HCA-2003A & 2205A
    Front: Rti12's
    Center: Csi A6
    Side surrounds: Polk Rti A1's
    Atmos: Mirage Nanosats
    APC H15
    Power cords by Pepster, Morrow MA4 IC's, AQ Midnight, AQ Chocolate HDMI's[/SIZE]
    The rest is TBD.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    I guess one answer is that it doesn't matter, just use the ones that have better synergy with your system... but for me, I want to know the real answer so I can replace the offending component.

    Kinda the whole thing in a nutshell. Except....not everyone can afford to replace the offending componant, so they tend to color the sound to their liking by adding different cables, tube buffers, dacs, etc. Nothing wrong with that either. As long as you dig what you hear, who cares if there's 20 pieces of gear between source and speakers.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • txcoastal1
    txcoastal1 Posts: 13,287
    edited January 2013
    What sucks is sometimes we have to color the sounds of a crappy recording
    2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
    Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
    Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
    Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC

    erat interfectorem cesar et **** dictatorem dicere a
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited January 2013
    tonyb wrote: »
    Kinda the whole thing in a nutshell. Except....not everyone can afford to replace the offending componant, so they tend to color the sound to their liking by adding different cables, tube buffers, dacs, etc. Nothing wrong with that either. As long as you dig what you hear, who cares if there's 20 pieces of gear between source and speakers.

    Equalizer to the rescue!! :biggrin:
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited January 2013
    Yeah man, but if you ask some, they'll never part with theirs. To each his own. LOL
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,194
    edited January 2013
    madmax wrote: »
    I'm big into the "less is more" theory and have high end equipment. Why the box of magic? Because it is magic!
    That rules!
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,194
    edited January 2013
    Right, so let's say you put new cables in, and your system sounds worse... it could be because your new cables are letting you hear problems in your components that your old cables were hiding, or it could be because your new cables are worse. How do you know?

    I guess one answer is that it doesn't matter, just use the ones that have better synergy with your system... but for me, I want to know the real answer so I can replace the offending component.
    It's something many struggle with when they hear differences when changing cables. Basically the best way to know is to compare what you hear on something else. I take a track I know extremely well and listen to the full song. Then I go back and listen to certain things like the sound of the snare drum , can I hear the stick? Switch back to my old cables and listen all the way through , then back to the snare drum. If one cable brings out the snare and the other shadows it , usually I'll favor the cable that brings out the snare.
    It's a matter of hearing everything that was recorded , nothing more , nothing less. This seems to really be difficult to do.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.