Need Advice: the best coaxial digital cable you choose

2»

Comments

  • headrott
    headrott Posts: 5,496
    edited December 2012
    Tonality in a digital cable doesn't have to be represented in a digital cable by noise or distortion. Different metals (or lack of metals as is the case of a digital cable I use by Cerious, which uses liquid ceramic conductors) can alter the nonality of the signal. Also, dielectrics, wire geometry, and how the wire is terminated (among other things) can alter the signal (due to signal speed, how the metal interacts with the digital signal, etc). It does take a certain quality level in your system (with enough resolution and detail), trained ears, and perhaps a little open-mindedness to recognize these differences. As you said, your perception can become your reality. That does not mean that it is reality. Perception is reality can go for both sides of the argument though. Reality is what it is. Becoming aware of that reality isone of the fun things about the audio journey.
    Relayer-Big-O-Poster.jpg
    Taken from a recent Audioholics reply regarding "Club Polk" and Polk speakers:
    "I'm yet to hear a Polk speaker that merits more than a sentence and 60 seconds discussion." :\
    My response is: If you need 60 seconds to respond in one sentence, you probably should't be evaluating Polk speakers.....


    "Green leaves reveal the heart spoken Khatru"- Jon Anderson

    "Have A Little Faith! And Everything You'll Face, Will Jump From Out Right On Into Place! Yeah! Take A Little Time! And Everything You'll Find, Will Move From Gloom Right On Into Shine!"- Arthur Lee
  • headrott
    headrott Posts: 5,496
    edited December 2012
    Also, to the original poster: I just found a for sale thread for 3 of the Cerious ceramic conductor digital cables on AudioCircle here. I highly recommend the coaxial digital cable. He has it listed for $225, but says he is accepting "reasonable offers". I definately recommend you pick this one up if you have the money. I use the AES/EBU version and it is an excellent cable.

    Edit: I have no affiliation with the seller at all. I just like the Cerious digital cable.
    Relayer-Big-O-Poster.jpg
    Taken from a recent Audioholics reply regarding "Club Polk" and Polk speakers:
    "I'm yet to hear a Polk speaker that merits more than a sentence and 60 seconds discussion." :\
    My response is: If you need 60 seconds to respond in one sentence, you probably should't be evaluating Polk speakers.....


    "Green leaves reveal the heart spoken Khatru"- Jon Anderson

    "Have A Little Faith! And Everything You'll Face, Will Jump From Out Right On Into Place! Yeah! Take A Little Time! And Everything You'll Find, Will Move From Gloom Right On Into Shine!"- Arthur Lee
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,200
    edited December 2012
    I've said it a thousand times and I'll say it again. Once you achieve the goal , you can't make a cable any better to perform the job better.
    With that being said , you need a solid high quality 75 ohm tested cable that can send the signal from A to B unaffected as much as possible.
    Most cable companies do a good job as I have not heard differences in Coax Digital cables. I have done listening tests with cables costing 50 bucks up to thousands. Terminating a 75 ohm cable is actually very easy. Building a quality digital coax cable is very easy , I build them all the time.
    If you want to feel safe and buy a good quality cable to assure your getting the best for your money , look into Audioquest , they build all of their cables to a very high standard. Can't go wrong here or buy a better digital coax cable from anyone.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • helipilotdoug
    helipilotdoug Posts: 1,229
    edited December 2012
    thank you for all inputs!

    besides theoretical info., would some people keep sharing which coaxial cables you think is the best sounding?

    thank you!!

    http://www.douglasconnection.com/Neotech-Digital-Interconnect-and-Vampire-Wire-9X-CB-NVDIC.htm
    Sunfire Theater Grand IV
    Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature
    SRS 2.1TL
    SDA 2BTL's
    CSiA6
    FXiA4
    FXiA6
    SDA 2A's
    Monitor 10A's

    http://www.douglasconnection.com
  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited December 2012
    tonyb wrote: »
    It's listed in post #5. Funny thing is I don't see anything that has or requires a digital cable.

    Really
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited December 2012
    Jeremy--
    I think the 75ohm specification is critical with digital, moreso than impedance on analog RCA's; which can be all over the map. This probably explains why analog IC's are alot easier to detect differences. Digital signal transmission should be more about how the cable performs impedance-wise, rather than boutique materials. Just my opinion. I once tried a Kimber Hero (analog IC) as a digital cable---it was horrible. Flubby bass, rolled off treble; it was then I KNEW even in digital, cable choice is important.

    The above example also explains why it's fine to use any digital cable as an analog IC, but the inverse is not necessarily true--due to poor adherence to impedance specs of analog cables.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited December 2012
    steveinaz wrote: »
    Jeremy--
    I think the 75ohm specification is critical with digital, moreso than impedance on analog RCA's; which can be all over the map. This probably explains why analog IC's are alot easier to detect differences. Digital signal transmission should be more about how the cable performs impedance-wise, rather than boutique materials. Just my opinion. I once tried a Kimber Hero (analog IC) as a digital cable---it was horrible. Flubby bass, rolled off treble; it was then I KNEW even in digital, cable choice is important.

    The above example also explains why it's fine to use any digital cable as an analog IC, but the inverse is not necessarily true--due to poor adherence to impedance specs of analog cables.

    Yeahp it is important to chose a DIGITAL cable.
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited December 2012
    Guys, can we discuss rather than body-slam?
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited December 2012
    steveinaz wrote: »
    Guys, can we discuss rather than body-slam?

    I wasn't trying to come off condescending. Actually agreeing with you, Interconnects dont make good SPDIF'S.
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited December 2012
    The comment wasn't for you.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • John K.
    John K. Posts: 822
    edited December 2012
    Paul, welcome. The coaxial cables that I've used for about the past six years are various lengths of these , which combine excellent build quality and low price. They have no "tonal characteristic"; coaxial cables simply are a pathway for the electromagnetic wave carrying the music signals traveling down the outside surface of the conductor. A cable which did impose a tonal characteristic would be either defective or the design of someone not interested in maintaining high fidelity standards.
  • headrott
    headrott Posts: 5,496
    edited December 2012
    John, perhaps you missed the part that a certain quality level is needed to hear the differences in cables (this means resolution and etail levels). The cable you are recommending itself (IMO) isn't to a standard to hear the differences in cables, so I am sure they all souunded the same to you. As I have not used a Monoprice cable (although I have read many others that have) I cannot comment on the build quality directly, however I can gurantee you it is not the same build quality as the Cerious cable I listed above. I am not necessarily suggesting the digital cable needs to be of this quality or cost to be of quality design, materials, and build to hear the differences in cables (although you need quality source, pre-amp, amp and speakers as well) along with the training to hear differences in audio equipment (this training can come from yourself) and as I stated previously, a somewhat open mind. Have you utilized all of these?

    To the OP, I would highly not suggest the Monoprice digital coaxial cable if you are looking for "the best". That Monoprice surely isn't it. Period. Cheap? Absolutely. "The best"? Absolutely not. I wouldn't even say "good", again IMO.
    Relayer-Big-O-Poster.jpg
    Taken from a recent Audioholics reply regarding "Club Polk" and Polk speakers:
    "I'm yet to hear a Polk speaker that merits more than a sentence and 60 seconds discussion." :\
    My response is: If you need 60 seconds to respond in one sentence, you probably should't be evaluating Polk speakers.....


    "Green leaves reveal the heart spoken Khatru"- Jon Anderson

    "Have A Little Faith! And Everything You'll Face, Will Jump From Out Right On Into Place! Yeah! Take A Little Time! And Everything You'll Find, Will Move From Gloom Right On Into Shine!"- Arthur Lee
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited December 2012
    Wow! A 12 foot digital cable for only $2. And he says it is as good as a Shunyata Python Ztron digital cable, or an MIT Magnum. With advice like that no wonder the average person has no idea what good sound is.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,981
    edited December 2012
    Amen to that Fox.......John is certainly entitled to his opinion, but thats about it. Cable threads....ya gotta love 'em.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited December 2012
    But a digital signal, because of the way its information is stored, can be quite robust. While the signal will always degrade to some degree in the cable, if the receiving circuit can actually reconstitute the original bitstream, reception of the signal will be, in the end analysis, perfect. No matter how much jitter, how much rounding of the shoulders of the square wave, or how much noise, if the bitstream is accurately reconstituted at the receiving end, the result is as though there'd been no degradation of signal at all. (taken from bluejeanscable.com)

    A digital cable either works or it doesn't. If the spdif cable meets the 75ohm standard it will sound identical to any other spdif cable.
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
  • nspindel
    nspindel Posts: 5,343
    edited December 2012
    A digital cable either works or it doesn't. If the spdif cable meets the 75ohm capacitance standard it will sound identical to any other spdif cable.

    Please teach us some more about this. I'm very interested in hearing more about this 75ohm capacitance thing of which you speak.
    Good music, a good source, and good power can make SDA's sing. Tubes make them dance.
  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited December 2012
    nspindel wrote: »
    Please teach us some more about this. I'm very interested in hearing more about this 75ohm capacitance thing of which you speak.

    Forgive my mistake, I still on my first cup of coffee
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,981
    edited December 2012
    Jeremy,
    You can take an article off the internet that claims one thing, and I can find one from another cable company that would state the opposite. Trick is just trying different cables, if you can't hear a difference thats cool, not everyone can, but it doesn't mean that becomes gospel for everyone else.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited December 2012
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs