CD Player shootout: Jolida-Eastern Electric-Musical Fidelity- Denon-Opera Consonance

2

Comments

  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    I apologize for this review taking so long. It’s actually been done for a little while but I just had to find the time to decipher my notes and sit down and type this out. I had planned to do it from the balcony of my rental in Key West, but I should have known better. I like you guys, but any of this was the furthest thing from my mind ;)

    Also, many of you who know me, already figured it would probably take me a long time to actually following up on the whole thing.

    OK, so where to begin? How about with operation and mechanics.

    EE: As stated before, this thing is solid. Perhaps the nicest fit and finish. Certainly the most solid feeling. A few taps on the top felt solid. Although it is the smallest, which I loved, it is very heavy. Nice and beefy. It feels as though its just full of junk. Wall to wall. Very nice. The tubes are housed under some spring loaded housings and are accessible w/o removing the cover unlike the other tubed dudes. Very nice!I might have preferred a couple tubes sticking out of the top to match all the other minimax gear, but that is a nitpick. Fit and finish is excellent. All materials feel thick and hefty. Even the coated steel feels very nice. As far as operation there are some functions you may love or hate. First, the display is dim. Quite dim. Very nice for dark listens, but moderately challenging in full sun. Also the display is behind a mirrored plate. Looks great, makes it tough to read in daylight, but manageable. Also like other audiophile CDP’s ive use, there is a discernable click when switching tracks. This is some kind of purposeful thing you hear through the machine and not the speakers. Apparently it’s there on purpose. Also, upon inserting the disc it begins playing. It doesn’t cue up on one, it just starts going, so you beter be ready. :D Lastly, the transport drawer is slow. And not terribly slow, just comparatively slow. The others move so quickly, it’s just very noceable. Also the drawer is super quiet. Slides out with no clunk, no whine, no annoyances. Very nice! This is the only unit that will play HDCD. Good luck finding one! ☺

    Jolida: Fit and finish here is also very nice. While it certainly feels like quality materils and finishes, it doesn’t quite have the (figurative) polish of the minimax but it is certainly no slouch. Fit is very precise, everything is aligned extremely well and operation is excellent. As I mentioned in a previous post, the buttons are disconcerting on the front of the unit, and I actually cringe when I think about having to use them. I’m neurotic about things like this, so if things like that don’t typically bug you, please disregard. The display is nice, the blue is not too bright nor is it too dim. One thing of import here is that this was the only tube player that had a standby mode. By using the on/off button on the remote, you put it in standby or on. The button on the unit is a hard on/off. The EE only has a hard on/off on the unit, no power button on the remote. The Jolida tray is similarly slow to come out comparatively but a hair quicker than EE. Also of import was the fact that I had more issues of reading a disc with this unit than any other. Discs consistently skipped if I used so molder ones from my college years, or ones that my wife abused in her car. Also, the time between inserting a disc and it recognizing the track information was the longest of all players. It averaged probably 8 – 10 seconds. This unit exhibited a quiet whine and clunk of the transport tray as it slid around. Nothing noticeable.

    Opera: beautiful almost white aluminum. Three buttons flanking either side of a black screen and simple tray. Very minimalist. Very much my style. Very sharp. It’s a couple pounds lighter than the tubed colleagues but hefty and solid. The case felt more resonant when tapped on. Lighting on screen was nice. A good blue that is similar to the jolida. The drawer is quick in and out in a snap with next to no noise except an occasional loud clunck as the aluminum face of the transport slams into its countersunk home. Data retrieval was speedy and all around great performance mechanically.

    MF: What a brute. This thing is heavy, thick, and unapologetically dense. It shows off it’s use of thick aterials. I’m sure many people like it. It’s just not my style of industrial design. Although it seems that the majority of audio designers have are stuck in the late eighties/early nineties for design sensibility. Maybe its their audience, maybe its them, I don’t know. At any rate, the fit and finish is excellent. Tight seams, very nice buttons, great operation, and a transport drawer so fast its likely to break your wrist if you’re not careful. Seriously the thing just feels eager to start playing. This and the EE tied for quickness of data recognition, no sooner had the MF ripped the cd from my hand than it was up and displaying all the track info. Almost instantaneously. This was the same for the EE, but the tray was so mauch slower it doesn’t seem as exaggerated. Display is blindingly bright! But this can be dimmed in 3 steps to very comfortable levels.

    Denon: cheap looking plastic aesthetics. Fit and finish is decent. Fit more so than finish. The construction feels and looks solid. I have seen erniejade’s 2910 in black, and it a nicer looking piece to be fair. I silver, it really exaggerates the plasticky nature of this unit. Display is nice. Comfortable to read. The tray is fast and noisy but not annoyingly so. The display can be toggled on or off. Unlike the others, this unit will play SACD, DVD-a, etc.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    Brian, I'm Back! Give me a call, maybe you could drop by Monday night! I have everything up and running right now since theyve been unplugged for 2 weeks. its good to be back ;)
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    cds used were a mix of pretty much everything. But in order to do an accurate a/b(/c/d) I made 5 copies of the same mix CD made from AIFF files of songs I am very familiar with. I then cued all players to the same point and started them simultaneously (almost). I then could switch back and forth midstream in any configuration to compare any to each and get a very realistic grip on what the differences were. I'm going to say on the front end, there were no winners or losers here. they were all fantastic.
    I'm not going to speak much later about the Denon so I will do it now. This player is really quite good. I never had a true appreciation for it until I could put it up against the others. For a SS player that can be had for <$200 it's a no brainer for the beginner breaking into audio mid-fi. For redbook it is somewhere between good and very good. lets say it gets you 75% of the way there, whih is a loooong way in the audio world as many of you know. Is it perfect? no way. does it look ugly? you bet. But if you have $150 and need a cd player and there is any posssibility you may do SACD or DVD-a in the future, theres no choice. it does a decent job of trying to impart an analog sound without losing great detail. I think, here, it does a pretty good job at it. I found that you need a fairly revealing system to motice much of the differences of it and the others here. It did tend to be a little bit more brightand some how less detailed, but al in all it was very nice sounding. I was quicker to fatigue with it, but on a pair of polks, I think that would be less likely to happen.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    laptop is about to die and im not yet home. I will resume a bit later.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited February 2012
    NO ! you were just getting to the good parts, don't leave us hanging !:eek:

    Looking forward to the rest of the review.
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited February 2012
    I'd take the Jolida with a better tube although I don't care for either of them.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,590
    edited February 2012
    Can we get some pics of the units as well? Front and back maybe?
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    I am suprised to hear you had an issue with the Jolida reading or speed. Mine reads faster then the Denon and will read disks that the Denon wont. My Denon drawer speed is also slow. .. Reallllyyyyyy slooowwwwwww lol The denon I can hear the disk spinning outside of the unit ( not through the speakers) and feel the vibration on the unit when i put my hand on it. On my Jolida it is more resistant to vibrating on the outside. Strange...
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    Monday is cool but i wont be able to till around 7 if that is ok?
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • thetawave2
    thetawave2 Posts: 268
    edited February 2012
    erniejade wrote: »
    I am suprised to hear you had an issue with the Jolida reading or speed. Mine reads faster then the Denon and will read disks that the Denon wont. My Denon drawer speed is also slow. .. Reallllyyyyyy slooowwwwwww lol The denon I can hear the disk spinning outside of the unit ( not through the speakers) and feel the vibration on the unit when i put my hand on it. On my Jolida it is more resistant to vibrating on the outside. Strange...

    I have the same "disk spinning" noise problem with my Denon DVD-1720. I use it only as a backup for the discs my Playstation won't read, so I put up with it.
    My Stereo: Tannoy D100s, Yaqin MC-100B, VPI Traveler, Dynavector 10x5 MC Phono Cartridge, heavily modified Yaqin MS-22B phono preamp, TEAC EQA-20 equalizer, Belkin PureAV PF30 Power Conditioner, Canare 4s11 speaker cables, Custom dust cover from DigitalDeckCovers
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    Ok, so I don’t know if it’s possible to drag this out anylonger. Haha.

    Let’s jump right in.

    LISTENING:

    I started each listening with the Denon as I have had this one the longest and have been quite used to it. I would switch in a pattern like this: a>b, a>c, a>d, a>e, b>c, b>d, b>e, c>d, c>e, d>e, and then variously as required.A quick note about the Pre-CD24 preamp: It is a VERY capable preamp. I felt that it was doing a great job of staying out of the way of the sources.

    Switching to the opera from the Denon was interesting. It was like those scenes in some cop action movie where theyre looking at a surveillance tape and the detective says “enhance” and the tech slaps some keys and the picture clears up to show the killer. Sibilance was brought down and sounds became cleaner and a tad more weighty. Also, the soundstage widened and deepened. It was as if the producer panned the channels a tad more in their relative directions from center.

    Moving onto the Minimax exhibited very subtle differences from the Opera. There was a noticeable warming. Night and day? No. It was still very detailed but noticeably the sharp edge of a hot guitar lead, or blat of a trumpet, or sharp “SSS” of a woman’s voice was attenuated. All signs pointing to the “tube sound.” The sound characteristics were very much what I was expecting for MiniMax, Completely enjoyable. Soundstage was comparable to the Opera.

    From there I moved to the Jolida. This was one of the most noticeable different players. The sound instantly got thick and warm. The sound just sounded fat. Like it was pouring out of the speakers like those NOVA videos of magma to the sea. Interestingly, detail was still pretty good. But this player doesn’t seem to feel bad about it. What it lacks in detail it makes up in emotion. I wish I had a better way to describe it other than emotion, but it’s the only way I can convey it. I could see why so many love the player. It’s kind of like SDA’s. The sound is expanded which results in some lack of detail but what it is achieving makes you forget what you are missing. It was like a warm comfy audio blanket and I often found myself near dozing off.

    Before I passed out I switched to the MF. Talk about an auditory culture shock. I shot up instantly. Where the Jolida is a warm log cabin, fire ablaze in front of your feet as you lay back on your bearskin rug, the Musical Fidelity is a The Farnsworth house. A glass home with sharp modern lines full of steel leather and polished travertine. The swelling comfort turned into exact shapes. Sounds that were just 8 feet wide were precise points in space in front of me. Detail was razor sharp. The Muscal Fidelity is a surgeon cutting each sound out with a scalpel. It was very engaging and commanded attention.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    I will try to the players on common characterists:

    Detail (1 least – 10 best)
    Den - 7
    Opera – 8.5
    EE – 8
    Jolida - 6
    MF - 9

    Soundstage width (1 least – 10 best)
    Den - 7
    Opera -8
    EE - 8
    Jolida – 9.5
    MF – 9

    Soundstage depth
    Den - 4
    Opera - 7
    EE - 7
    Jolida - 8
    MF - 8

    Sound warmth (9 bright, 5 neutral, 1 dark)
    Den - 7
    Opera - 4
    EE - 4
    Jolida - 3
    MF - 5

    Fit & finish (1 least – 10 best)
    Den - 6
    Opera - 8
    EE - 9
    Jolida - 8
    MF - 9

    Design (1 least – 10 best)
    Den - 2
    Opera – 8.5
    EE - 8
    Jolida - 6
    MF – 6.5

    Function (1 least – 10 best)
    Den - 5
    Opera - 9
    EE - 8
    Jolida - 8
    MF - 10
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    Pros/Cons

    Denon:
    Pro: i have a new respect for this player. It holds it’s own pretty well for being able to be purchased for ~$150. For that price it performs very well.
    Cons:
    The ugly duckling. Remote. Tough to fully setup without a monitor.

    Opera:
    Pro:
    Analog sound without maintenance of tubes. Beautiful styles. Superb detail. Easy listening. Excellent bass
    Cons:
    I don’t have any cons for this player. If you like tubes or SS you should really like this player. It isn’t molasses-ey rich, nor is it obsessively detailed but it does everything very well.

    EE:
    Pros:
    Best blend of SS clarity and bass with a hint of tube warmth. This plays well with all styles of music. I enjoyed it very much. Beautiful looking. Comparable performance to the Opera. A little bass-light (could be tubes)
    Cons:
    Dim lights during daytime play.

    Jolida:
    Pro:
    Emotional. You certainly “feel” the music. Most enveloping soundstage. Good seperation. Bad recordings sound good.
    Cons:
    A bit too relaxed for my taste. Heavily colored, but thatis what people love about this player. Great recordings sound good. A tad flabby (could be tubes)

    MF:
    Pro:
    Best detail. Very precise with a lack of sibilance and fatiguing characteristics. Very clean clear sound. The highest quality recordings sounded best on this player. Excellent for critical listening. Bass tightness is crazy good.
    Cons:
    Very revealing (good and bad). Bad recordings sound bad. Remote is cheap compared to unit
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    enders, ill get some more pics up when I can.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    Great writeup!! When I first got my jolida I said the same thing that it was almost too warm and I wanted more detail and top end out of it. That's when f1 suggested the ei tubes I now have. It cleared the tubbyness up and tightened up the bottom.
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,572
    edited February 2012
    Yeah, simply changing the awful stock Chinese tubes in the Jolida improves the performance dramatically. Also, upgrading the power cord nets a huge improvement as well.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • audiocr381ve
    audiocr381ve Posts: 2,588
    edited February 2012
    Absolutely excellent reviews. Now this is something I'd use to help me purchase an piece of gear.

    I have to ask, which one are you keeping? That will tell us a lot ;)

    Based on your reviews, it would be really hard for me to choose any of em'. If I had to choose from your list, I would probably grab the Opera. I really love the emotional pull from the Jolida, and would normally go for the piece that provided that sound, but the flabbyness is a turn off (lol).
  • Obsession18
    Obsession18 Posts: 191
    edited February 2012
    The fat sound was exactly what I initially experienced with the Jolida using the stock Chinese tubes; the Psvane tubes put the Jolida on a diet without killing the huge soundstage, what a wonderful upgrade.
    2-Channel System
    Analog: VPI Traveler TT, Audio Technica 150MLX, Pro-Ject Tube Box DS
    CD Player: Jolida JD-100 Preamp: Cambridge 840E Amp: Odyssey Kismet Stereo
    Spkrs: Tyler Acoustics Linbrook Signature Systems
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,967
    edited February 2012
    Cool review, one must realize when it comes to tubed anything, the tubes can make a significant impact on what comes out the end, and most come stock with crappy or just ok tubes.

    Did enjoy the review, you obviously spent some time with the players. That EE I had a feeling was going to be a sleeper as well.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,590
    edited February 2012
    Good review. Look forward to the pics when they come.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited February 2012
    Great review of some nice pieces. Thanks. The one thing I can take away from some of this is that I would really "dislike" the sound of the Musical Fidelity--overly etched sound that reveals everything and can make half my CD collection make me feel like cringing! No thanks! I'll stick with "fat" and "warm"!

    That said, some people can't get enough of that kind of sound! Where's Mantis? lol

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    cnh, I can assure you, the MF is not etched in its presentation. Hopefully erniejade will comment a bit later. He just left my place after a couple hours of giving them a thorough run through. The MF is very precise and revealing, but not etched. The high end is not fatiguing at all. And trust that if they were, the Emerald Physics would let you know.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    tony, We did some rolling tonight on the Jolida. It cleaned up a lot of the muddiness, which was driving me crazy. It's still a bit diffuse with the EI's in it now, but much tighter than before. Unfortunately we didnt have tubes for EE to roll. I will have some this week and will report on the results. I know the EE is something special, but I am sure some fresh tubes will help.

    One big shocker tonight was the HDCD performance of the Denon. It surprised us both. It was quite good.
    I am convinced the Denon is a great deal. I know I've said it before, but honestly it is. And with the upgradability of it, its probably one of the best audio deal in the entry level market.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • Loud &amp; Clear
    Loud &amp; Clear Posts: 1,538
    edited February 2012
    Well done, nr. I liked those Svetlana tubes but perhaps they've gotten long in the tooth. I'm surprised by the comment about the drawer, as I always found the speed and power with which it opened to be somewhat frighteningly fast and strong.

    The JD200 does sound different than it's predecessor, seemingly providing even greater depth and analog linearity. This one is a tube roller's dream, or nightmare, with six tubes inside of the box.

    Great descriptions of the the units. Excellent value to the forum, imo.

    Two Channel Setup:

    Speakers: Wharfedale Opus 2-3
    Integrated Amp: Krell S-300i
    DAC: Arcam irDac
    Source: iMac
    Remote Control: iPad Mini

    3.2 Home Theater Setup:

    Fronts: Klipsch RP-160M
    Center: Klipsch RP-160M
    Subwoofer: SVS PB12NSD (X 2)
    AVR: Yamaha Aventage RX-A2030
    Blu Ray: Sony BDP-S790
    TV Source: DirecTV Genie
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    L&C, you are right about the drawer. I looked back at my review of it, and I wrote from the wrong notes. The drawer on the Jolida is indeed very speedy. The EE was a bit slow and the Denon tray crawled out almost begrudgingly.

    I'm certainly not disparaging the svetlana tubes. My wife liked them the the most, and they were very pleasing. Very ambient and super expansive. But just not my style. A little too fuzzy and feel-good for my tastes.

    And thank you for your kind words. I hope it helps people. As I was saying, I think these are all fantastic players, and it all depends on what type of listener you are. Hopefully I conveyed that message.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    Newrival, thank you for inviting me over! The test was fun and definitely interesting!

    1st up was the EE Minimax. It was a solid player but, to me, it had a bit of distortion and the vocals were a bit recessed for my taste. I think if we could have tube rolled it, it might have changed the outcome of this but for this test, it was my least favorite player as it stood without tube rolling on redbook NON HD cd. I am not saying that this might not be a stellar player, but without tube rolling it, I cannot say. Do I think its worth picking up and tube rolling YES heck yes. I would take a chance on this unit and tube roll it in a heartbeat. You can hear the potential but, its not quite there so again, I am going to say the tubes that are in it are holding it back. Looks wise, I think it looks great. Easy to place either on top of something or in a rack. It is a great looking unit.

    The Jolida before tube rolling, If the EE was a warm spring day, then that same warm spring day, open up the window and feel the breeze come in through the window! The sound all of a sudden sounded like it came from every direction. The vocals, guitar, organs just all of a sudden poped out with a wide wide soundstage. The bass was tubby, flabby and annoying i would guess between the 60-200 hz area. Now for this unit we did tube roll. I had some Sovtek tubes I had in my Jolida before I got the EI tubes that sounded way better than the stock ones but wasnt the sound I was looking for.

    The Denon, on redbook ( I own a 2910, and a jolida myself) was to me more in line with the EE Minimax as far performance on redbook cd's. It is a solid player for the $ especially in the used market. Actually if you go between the Denon and the EE, its a fair fight on redbook. Both against the Jolida without tube rolling, this one would boil down to personal preference. Without tube rolling, the Denon was more neutral but, how can I put this?. In a way boring to me next to the Jolida. Again the Jolida has a much different sound where things pop out at you instead of just being there. Again this is on normal redbook cd. NOT hdcd or sacd.
    The Musical Fidelity player.. Well, it had the best of both worlds. It was clearer, than all 3 players but, the sound stage of the jolida was wider. I will say on a good cd, it is awesome but, on a bad or even something that was recorded mediocre, it made it sound worse than it was or should be. The highs were crisp but never once got fatiguing? Have you ever had a cd ( non remastered,) of something and then the LP of the same thing, the LP 1st thing to me that pops out are how much crisper the highs are. Dave Brubeck time out cd non remaster vs the LP comes to mind. ( yes the remaster cd was better but I?m just trying to make a comparison ) The Jolida sound stage was wider though? like 10th row at a concert vs 1st row where the sound just seemed to be in front of you when your 1st row, but 10 rows back it seems to be a bit more expanded. On a side note of the MF, for those who are just joining us, this is a PREAMP / CD COMBO UNIT! The preamp on this unit is wayyyyyyy better than expected. Like shockingly good!


    Give me a few to write up part 2
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    More about the MF combo unit, if you are looking for a great cd player and a preamp, do not hesitate to grab the MF cd-24. The preamp is solid, clean, not colored, and good looking to boot. A solid value on the used market in my opinion.

    Round 2 next up.
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    So which one do I choose??

    I don't know! haha. I haven't yet. It's really quite difficult. I may keep 2 because of that fact that the differences really ARE that large to justify it. The MF does precision so well it's breathtaking on ultra-fine recordings, and a tubed player really is nice for "romantic" non-critical listening. When you just want to "feel" the music.

    -If I were only going to buy one player and be done with it, it might be the Opera. It does everything well. I don't think it outperformed all others in any one area, but it just did everything well. I would especially want this if I didnt want the maintenance of tubes. Or just want to turn it on and immediately listen for 30 minutes then shut it off.

    -If you want the in between tube/ss type of feel (clarity of SS with slight warmth of tubes) and want to have the control offered from tube rolling, then I would choose the EE. If you have a bright system, this would be a good choice. Also the EE would be a good choice if you have HDCD's or you want a good headphone amp for CD listening built in.

    -If you have tube amps and/or pre and could use some definition, then the Opera or MF would be for you. If you like the ultimate in clarity, dynamic range, bass extension, and control, then Musical Fidelity has got your number.

    -If I were just getting started in audio or had a limited budget of <$300 for a player, I would choose the Denon.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited February 2012
    ej, thanks for chiming in with some great insight! looking forward to part 2.

    I think your point of view will really be helpful to people in the market.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited February 2012
    A while ago, I was at a garage sale and found Ben Taylor ( son of James Taylor and Carly Simon!) The cd is called Famous Among the Barns. It quickly became one of my fave cd’s. It is recorded well and does a great job of showing off a player that can do HDCD. We used track 7 a cover of Time of the Season from the Zombies. Trust us, give the song and the track a fair shake. I thought since the EE and the Denon both decode HDCD, it would be cool to compare the 2 on HD. Well we did all on it LOL.

    1st up, the EE. It helped jump this unit to life. It sounded much better but, it to me still had some narrow sound stage and some distortion to it. I think again the tubes were at fault.
    Next up the Denon OMG you not even believe it was the same cd player that you just heard a few min. ago. Shockingly good. Clean, dynamic, solid bass hit, not flabby. We looked at each other for a few not even saying a word because we were both in shock! One of us finally spit out WOW. LOL it was one of those funny classic audio moments. Neither one of us were expecting it and we both own the unit!

    Next up, the jolida, the bass was just awesome and the drums just jumped out even more than the denon. The jolida just has a way to make things jump out at you. But again the bass was a bit flabby so I talked Angelo into rolling the tubes at that point! I told him this will cure it! while we let the jolida cool down, onto the MF

    The MF again constantly was sharper, crisper than the rest but, some of the wide soundstage that the jolida has is not there. It had the solid bass hit, but just more narrow. I can see where some music would sound better on this and some would sound better on the Jolida. If I had to choose between the 2 I cant. They both have some outstanding things they both do well.

    Same song tube rolled on the Jolida with the sovtek tubes ( the box I brought them in does say EI but they are from my EI’s LOL ) both of us agreed the bass was 10000000000x better. The what I call the signature wide sound stage still was there but the bass was much tighter. It seems like no matter what tube I ever put in the jolida, that soundstage stayed wide so I call it the Jolida signature sound.
    The MF though is much crisper, and from my own experience, the Sovtek tubes are good with the jolida but, that was one of my complaints with the Sovtek tubes on that unit, I wanted a bit more on the high end without losing the bottom. F1 suggested to me the EI;s and I haven’t looked back since. How does this apply to the test… I guess it doesn’t but I am just letting everyone know on my experience with this unit, when you roll the tubes, you will get different sounds. Sometimes it just takes a few tubes to get the sound you want. Would the EI be as crisp as the MM… I am going to say no but it would get you closer to it.

    I would love to hear the EE with different tubes. I might make it more on par with the MM. The Jolida for anyone would come down to personal preference. Do you want a wide sound stage, or something more direct. Neither of the units though sounded phony or fake in the soundstage. They all sounded real like it should be there but just had different presentations of it.

    For crispness, the MM had it. For a hair deeper bass and a wider sound stage, the Jolida had it. On the used market, all the players here present an outstanding value. I wish the jolida and the MM had sacd though! Now, it makes me wonder, if the MM on the preamp side, had a loop in and out and if we put a tube buffer in play there how would that have sounded…
    Anyway, folks, if you on a budget, that denon is only a hair behind except on hd and sacd… on hd and sacd it is a close race. It is an outstanding value If we didn’t have them side by side, most people would never know what might have been missing . it is really that good of a player for the $.
    If you have bright speakers, the MM if NOT the cd player for you. I would look at one of the other ones. Remember besides synergy, matching components does help. For the Emerald Physics all the cd players sounded great but to my ears, the MM and the rolled Jolida were the top 2. On Santana Jingo ( Mobile Fidelity ) the organ and guitar jumped out at me more on the jolida but, on the MM it was a bit more refined. Again it’s a hard call between the 2 and to me there was no clear winner. Sorry about that! I know some people like to just read this beat the pants off of this type of reviews or comparisons but, I cant do that because I liked both for different reasons and I would be happy with either unit. So to me, in sound only after the tube roll, the top 2 were the MM and the Jolida.
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.