My state still sucks

2»

Comments

  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited January 2012
    I guess I'd have to say it's OK. The rider can choose to go after 2 minutes if it's clear or they can choose to sit there until it changes. I would assume riders who encountered this issue prior to the law change go ahead and go anyway if the light isn't tripped, so I'm not sure anything is changing other than it's now legal to do so. I know when driving in my car if a light is stuck on red, after a certain amount of time and when it's clear of traffic I just go.

    I don't think anything is any different just because it's legal now. It was being done prior, I'm sure of it, and if the rider is unsafe, they are unsafe regardless if it's legal to go on a red light or not. Allowing them to choose to leave a red light after 2 minutes isn't changing anything safety wise.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,957
    edited January 2012
    Good trick, I'll have to remember that.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • SDA1C
    SDA1C Posts: 2,072
    edited January 2012
    tonyb wrote: »
    I know man, total B.S.

    For the rest of you, you still haven't answer the question. Does the law make traffic more safe or less ? Pretty simple yes or no question.
    It's not about turning right on a red, it's about turning left on a red,going straight across on a red, is that safer or not ?

    I know you and Heiney probably have woke up next to one another at some point :eek: but you did notice he didn't answer the question either right?:cheesygrin:

    Safety wise...It won't change a thing (as eluded to earlier). Anybody on a motorcycle has probably done this before either adding to or subtracting from the statistics of motorcycle accidents already.

    Also, (as stated earlier) If you "ride" you are WAY more likely to LOOK BEFORE you pull into traffic red light green light or no light. So that's a wash.

    Is it another bullshi7 law in an attempt to justify the lawmakers jobs, costing the rest of us countless dollars???? ABSOLUTELY!
    Too much **** to list....
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited January 2012
    heiney9 wrote: »
    I guess I'd have to say it's OK. The rider can choose to go after 2 minutes if it's clear or they can choose to sit there until it changes. I would assume riders who encountered this issue prior to the law change go ahead and go anyway if the light isn't tripped, so I'm not sure anything is changing other than it's now legal to do so. I know when driving in my car if a light is stuck on red, after a certain amount of time and when it's clear of traffic I just go.

    I don't think anything is any different just because it's legal now. It was being done prior, I'm sure of it, and if the rider is unsafe, they are unsafe regardless if it's legal to go on a red light or not. Allowing them to choose to leave a red light after 2 minutes isn't changing anything safety wise.

    H9
    SDA1C wrote: »
    I know you and Heiney probably have woke up next to one another at some point :eek: but you did notice he didn't answer the question either right?:cheesygrin:

    Actually I did, see above. Pay attention :wink:

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • SDA1C
    SDA1C Posts: 2,072
    edited January 2012
    Yea...you beat me to it. lol.
    Too much **** to list....
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited January 2012
    SDA1C wrote: »
    Is it another bullshi7 law in an attempt to justify the lawmakers jobs, costing the rest of us countless dollars???? ABSOLUTELY!

    At the same token, it is probably only an issue because some idiot cop saw a motorcyclist do it and pulled him over for it lacking the common sense that it should just be allowed anyway.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it