Computer Speakers

AsSiMiLaTeD

Also, can anyone comment on the difference betwee these two models from Swan?

http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-m200mkii&products_id=80
and
http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-d1080mkii08&products_id=161

Is the M200 really worth that much more?

Sherardp

I've read good reviews on the Swans MKII. The one thing I can say though is that they look very nice. I have no personal experience with these, but they do look sweet.

newrival

AsSiMiLaTeD wrote: »

Also, can anyone comment on the difference betwee these two models from Swan?

http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-m200mkii&products_id=80
and
http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-d1080mkii08&products_id=161

Is the M200 really worth that much more?

wish I could comment on the mkII vs the mkIII but I only have heard my mkIII's. I was debating between the two but had read some comparisons on other forums and they felt the III's were well worth the extra scratch so I went for those.

TouchOfEvil

I run a pair of Tannoy DC4's for my computer setup. Recommended by another member here. Excellent speaker for close range listening and very impressive performance at their size.

TECHNOKID

AsSiMiLaTeD wrote: »

Also, can anyone comment on the difference betwee these two models from Swan?

http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-m200mkii&products_id=80
and
http://www.theaudioinsider.com/product_info.php?p=swan-d1080mkii08&products_id=161

Is the M200 really worth that much more?

SQ aside, the M200 are IMO a work of art. They look really spiffy. :cool: My only beef with these computer speakers is the fact that one of them is slave and running from the master's amp. For me and my use this is totally unacceptable.:frown: I guess to each one their own!:redface: