Hot Amps

rubin
rubin Posts: 565
edited August 2010 in 2 Channel Audio
Is it true or myth that hotter running power amps also sound "warmer"?
Post edited by rubin on
«13

Comments

  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited July 2010
    Myth.


    BUSTED.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • ShinAce
    ShinAce Posts: 1,194
    edited July 2010
    All other things being equal, a hotter amp is an amp that either:
    A) has problems radiating heat
    B) has a higher idle current

    Higher idle current for two identical amps gives the higher idle current(or quiescent current, or bias) typically, lower distortion.

    So it is derived from truth. In itself, useless.

    Does having more horsepower equal faster car? Too many other factors to consider.

    edit:
    C) an amp set to higher volume
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,420
    edited July 2010
    ShinAce wrote: »
    All other things being equal, a hotter amp is an amp that either:
    A) has problems radiating heat
    B) has a higher idle current

    Higher idle current for two identical amps gives the higher idle current(or quiescent current, or bias) typically, lower distortion.

    So it is derived from truth. In itself, useless.

    Does having more horsepower equal faster car? Too many other factors to consider.

    edit:
    C) an amp set to higher volume


    A hotter amp could also be stolen.:p

    I have never seen a cool running tube amp, and they all have been on teh warm side to my ear when compared to solid state designs.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    rubin wrote: »
    Is it true or myth that hotter running power amps also sound "warmer"?

    Mostly, yes. Generally a hotter running amp means it's designed to run class A operation. There are lots of other design variables but class A operation and especially pure single ended class A (very expensive) generally has the characteristics of warmer sounding gear.

    This is really all dependent on the design, materials, and quality of workmanship and parts. Single ended class A amps have primarily a 2nd order harmonic distortion which is what many refer to as a "warmer" sound.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    Myth.


    BUSTED.

    No it's not a myth, but more needs to be known about what the OP is asking.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited July 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    No it's not a myth, but more needs to be known about what the OP is asking.

    I should clarify that there may be a grain of truth somewhere in there.... but as always, there's exceptions, and an amp running hot is likely not the REASON for the warmth. ;)

    Am i getting warm yet? (Excuse the pun :p)
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • Fongolio
    Fongolio Posts: 3,516
    edited July 2010
    My Carver TFM-45 runs very cool and yet is very warm sounding. Go figure.
    SDA-1C (full mods)
    Carver TFM-55
    NAD 1130 Pre-amp
    Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
    The Clamp
    Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
    Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
    Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
    Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
    Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
    ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
    Ben's IC's
    Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM
  • rubin
    rubin Posts: 565
    edited July 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    No it's not a myth, but more needs to be known about what the OP is asking.

    OK, class A runs HOT and are considered the better sounding solid state designs. How about the more common class A/B? MY nad amps (a/b) sound pretty "laid back", Are ab designs comparable to pure class A?
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited July 2010
    I was wondering about radioactivity.
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited July 2010
    Just for more anecdotal "evidence," when i had cstmar01's Adcom GFA-5802 here, it cut down my heating bills by at least $300/month.

    It wasn't as warm sounding as my Oinker M5150, and the Oinker stays cool to the touch. (Of course, that sounds weird, since Oinkers are known to run hot, but mine doesn't.)



    Footnote: Also worth mentioning that i'm not entirely convinced that my Oinker is un-tampered with.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • WilliamM2
    WilliamM2 Posts: 4,775
    edited July 2010
    A hotter running amp could also be a poor inefficient design.
  • sucks2beme
    sucks2beme Posts: 5,601
    edited July 2010
    The output design sets the sound. An example is B&K st202 and other MOSFET amps sound warm.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited July 2010
    WilliamM2 wrote: »
    A hotter running amp could also be a poor inefficient design.

    Class A runs its output devices biased "on" for the full cycle of a waveform - the devices dissipate essentially full power all the time. Horrifically inefficient but not a "poor" design in respect to other performance parameters. Class B is much more efficient... but even folks who like push-pull amps (and I am not... heh, heh... biased against them) don't want to listen to all Class B, all the time. Thus the preponderance of Class AB amps.

    EDIT: By the way, a good amplifier should sound like nothing (and they do).
  • megasat16
    megasat16 Posts: 3,521
    edited July 2010
    rubin wrote: »
    OK, class A runs HOT and are considered the better sounding solid state designs. How about the more common class A/B? MY nad amps (a/b) sound pretty "laid back", Are ab designs comparable to pure class A?

    Some well designed Class AB amps are believed to be sounds as good as Class A. There is no definite theory to prove what Class A (pure Class a or any other kind of Class A) is better than well made Class AB amp. This Class A or AB debate existed in history longer and runs deeper than most cable threads. Having said that, Pure Class A is ideal listening amp for me.

    I like HOT Girls and HOT amp. It's nothing wrong with Hotness and inefficiency if you know what I mean.
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin:
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,566
    edited July 2010
    If it's not running hot, it isn't worth squat. :D
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,420
    edited July 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    If it's not running hot, it isn't worth squat. :D


    What about Sunfire???


    Wait! Don't answer that one.;)
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    I should clarify that there may be a grain of truth somewhere in there.... but as always, there's exceptions, and an amp running hot is likely not the REASON for the warmth. ;)

    Am i getting warm yet? (Excuse the pun :p)

    You have no idea what you are talking about. Get some more experience in this hobby.
    rubin wrote: »
    OK, class A runs HOT and are considered the better sounding solid state designs. How about the more common class A/B? MY nad amps (a/b) sound pretty "laid back", Are ab designs comparable to pure class A?

    Not really, but there are some great class a/b designs out there.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • rubin
    rubin Posts: 565
    edited July 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    If it's not running hot, it isn't worth squat. :D

    end of story:D
  • rubin
    rubin Posts: 565
    edited July 2010
    WilliamM2 wrote: »
    A hotter running amp could also be a poor inefficient design.

    possibly.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    WilliamM2 wrote: »
    A hotter running amp could also be a poor inefficient design.

    Inefficient, yes. Poor design, think again. Nice try though.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    megasat16 wrote: »
    Some well designed Class AB amps are believed to be sounds as good as Class A. There is no definite theory to prove what Class A (pure Class a or any other kind of Class A) is better than well made Class AB amp. This Class A or AB debate existed in history longer and runs deeper than most cable threads. Having said that, Pure Class A is ideal listening amp for me.

    I like HOT Girls and HOT amp. It's nothing wrong with Hotness and inefficiency if you know what I mean.

    Not really, they can come close but not the whole enchilada. Same as no solid state amp can replicate tubes. Some can have a few characteristics but again, not the whole enchilada.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • megasat16
    megasat16 Posts: 3,521
    edited July 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    Not really, they can come close but not the whole enchilada. Same as no solid state amp can replicate tubes. Some can have a few characteristics but again, not the whole enchilada.

    H9

    May be not the whole package but who knows. It's hard to say any Class A amp is designed and manufactured to sound better than any Class AB amp. There are such things as designer mistake and quality control and user ears. This is worse than ABX and DABX tests ever could prove.

    That's why this debate has been down in history and we don't need to repeat it here.

    We could do splitting hairs or counting beans or something? :D
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin:
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited July 2010
    No crossover distortion in Class A. Never had it, never will.
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited July 2010
    Mi X250 gets pretty hot, but it doesn't sound. All the sound comes from the speakers. Go figure.
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited July 2010
    Ricardo wrote: »
    Mi X250 gets pretty hot, but it doesn't sound. All the sound comes from the speakers. Go figure.

    If you put dummy loads on the outputs of many vacuum tube amp, play some music and turn the gain up high, you can sometimes hear the output transformer laminations "sing"...
  • TNRabbit
    TNRabbit Posts: 2,168
    edited July 2010
    This thread didn't need to go past post #2.
    TNRabbit
    NO Polk Audio Equipment :eek:
    Sunfire TG-IV
    Ashly 1001 Active Crossover
    Rane PEQ-15 Parametric Equalizers x 2
    Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature Seven
    Carver AL-III Speakers
    Klipsch RT-12d Subwoofer
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    TNRabbit wrote: »
    This thread didn't need to go past post #2.

    Wrong again.............thanks for playing.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited July 2010
    Alright, can someone explain why an amp running hot makes it warmer sounding before i go and smother my amp in a towel to get a warmer sound?
    heiney9 wrote: »
    You have no idea what you are talking about. Get some more experience in this hobby.
    H9

    What i was saying was that the amp wouldn't sound warm BECAUSE it was hot, but rather the construction/function of the amp that make it warm sounding may make it run hotter.

    So you're saying that that's incorrect. So... if i can get my amp to run hotter, i should hear more of that warmer sound that i adore so much. I'm not going to throw that idea right out the window just yet, but i would appreciate an explanation as to why that's the case.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited July 2010
    You're talking in circles. And re-read the thread it has been explained already. Nobody said anything about making your amp run hotter by smothering it. That's not how I read the OP's question/remark. And that suggestion is just simply absurd.

    Here's an article about running gain devices (those silicon thingy's[or tubes too] in audio gear that make sound) in the "sweet spot", when you do and it's part of the design a hotter running amp will sound "warmer, sweeter" whatever adjective one can come up with to describe that effortless, smooth, non-edgy, euphoric sound.

    http://www.passlabs.com/pdfs/articles/sweet_spot.pdf
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited July 2010
    Got it. I simply misinterpreted the whole thread, then. I can definitely understand that the characteristics that make a warm sounding amp can also result in more heat.

    Carry on. :)
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000