IRON MAN 2 (Paramount/Marvel Studios)

2»

Comments

  • Lost
    Lost Posts: 48
    edited July 2010
    Keiko wrote: »
    Why do you care so much?

    The fact is, this area of the forum has been much more peaceful and has healed quite a bit since LoMo was axed. If he's allowed to come back, and I hope he's not, then we go backwards. The Music and Movies board goes right back into turmoil. I'm sure the mods have considered this and I'm sure life's been much easier for them too since the trash was taken out. We don't need it back in here again. Capiche?



    So STHU! :mad:

    Edit: Reported for openly questioning forum policy and guidelines, Lost.

    So one can't ask questions? Wow...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cstmar01
    cstmar01 Posts: 4,424
    edited July 2010
    Lost wrote: »
    Okay so change it to banned instead of temporary ban then.

    but why does it matter??? I told you were you can find his reviews if that is what your missing....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DarqueKnight
    DarqueKnight Posts: 6,765
    edited July 2010
    Lost wrote: »
    How come Mike is still banned?? How long is a temporary ban?
    Lost wrote: »
    Okay, looked at the rules:

    1st Offense: A private warning sent via PM
    2st Offense: A public warning issued and the closing of the thread
    3nd Offense: A 7 Day suspension from posting privileges
    4th Offense: A 30 Day suspension from posting privileges
    5th Offense: A LIFETIME BAN

    The warnings have a one year shelf life. They will expire 1 year from the date of the initial warning.

    *Polk Moderators can decide to skip the minor warnings and go directly to the lifetime ban based on severity of the offense.

    If it is indeed a temporary ban then the most he would get would be 30 days. His last post was May 15th so the temporary ban should have expired June 15th.

    The "Temporary Ban" situation is not specifically addressed in the rules. The only "BAN" mentioned is a lifetime ban. The penalty for 3rd and 4th offenses are "suspensions" rather than "bans".
    Lost wrote: »
    So one can't ask questions? Wow...

    Sure you can ask questions...if they are appropriate. Most communities have some written or unwritten rules regarding what is appropriate and inappropriate communication. I would ask that you revisit the rules and heed this instruction:
    Polk Forum Rules: 9) Forum rules & guidelines are not up for debate. This is not a democracy, but rather a private forum owned by Polk Audio. Anyone openly debating the rules we have set in place will be removed.

    I find it odd that over 50% of a new member's posts would be inquiries about another member's membership status.

    Welcome to the forum and thank you for your cooperation.
    Proud and loyal citizen of the Digital Domain and Solid State Country!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited July 2010
    Lost wrote: »
    Okay so change it to banned instead of temporary ban then.


    Excerpt from Bugs & Thugs;

    Rocky: Shut up!
    Mugsy: DUH what'd I do, boss?
    Rocky: I said button yer lip.
    Mugsy: DUH, Oh, okay, boss.
    [Literally buttons up his lip]
    Mugsy: [Muffled] How's this, boss?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited July 2010
    Lost wrote: »
    So one can't ask questions? Wow...

    Yeah but your identity(ies) are so transparent as is your agenda so WOW! . . .:rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,649
    edited July 2010
    hearingimpared wrote: »
    Oh Freddy you missed a lot!:)
    I guess I need to read more threads to keep up with the goings on.:D
    This was the reason candyliquor was banned.
    Good old CL35 ,he seemed just a tad offside but I can't deny he was good entertainment value.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited July 2010
    FTGV wrote: »
    I guess I need to read more threads to keep up with the goings on.:D

    Good old CL35 ,he seemed just a tad offside but I can't deny he was good entertainment value.

    He was awesome entertainment value but a true pain in the **** both to members and mods not to mention the wealth of misinformation he put out in his drivel.

    I gotta say though Carl is a really nice guy but on the forum he's a completely different person.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,649
    edited July 2010
    hearingimpared wrote: »
    not to mention the wealth of misinformation he put out
    Yeah he was'nt on the most solid of ground technically.
    I gotta say though Carl is a really nice guy but on the forum he's a completely different person.
    I do remember reading that he was quite a good guy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Jstas
    Jstas Posts: 14,845
    edited July 2010
    How does a guy who has been on the forums only a couple days and says he's of no relation know all about a member on temporary ban and when he was banned? So much so that he can complain about the person's "length or temporary ban"?
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited July 2010
    Jstas wrote: »
    How does a guy who has been on the forums only a couple days and says he's of no relation know all about a member on temporary ban and when he was banned? So much so that he can complain about the person's "length or temporary ban"?

    He's LoMo . . . or even X! LOL!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited July 2010
    Keiko wrote: »
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Wi9hTun8VU

    :rolleyes:

    Hehehe!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter