Calibration Disc....

Systems
Systems Posts: 14,873
edited January 2009 in Electronics
Hello

Was just wondering what everyone was using to calibrate Plasmas and LCD's these days.....

I looked at a couple on Amazon but seemed like they were getting some pretty poor reviews.....

Thanks,
Testing
Testing
Testing
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • CaligulaPolk
    CaligulaPolk Posts: 1,650
    edited January 2009
    if u have blu ray player i recommend dve essential calibration
    I am 100% BORN DEAF and No I am not kidding! :D Why am I here? My wife's hearing! :p

    My Home Theater Rig || Television: 58" Panasonic TH-58PZ800U Viera Plasma || Power Conditioner: Power Monster HTS 3600 MKII || Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR805 || Blu-Ray/Gaming: 60 Gigabytes Playstation 3 || Amplifier: Emotiva XPA-5 || Fronts: Polk Audio RT800i || Center: Polk Audio CS245i || Surrounds: TBA|| Subwoofer: TBA
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited January 2009
    Lorthos wrote: »
    Hello

    Was just wondering what everyone was using to calibrate Plasmas and LCD's these days.....

    I looked at a couple on Amazon but seemed like they were getting some pretty poor reviews.....

    Thanks,

    A technician with ISF training.
    http://www.imagingscience.com/
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • Conradicles
    Conradicles Posts: 6,334
    edited January 2009
    if u have blu ray player i recommend dve essential calibration

    That is what I used and it worked great for my PS3 and Pioneer Plasma.;)
  • manman
    manman Posts: 256
    edited January 2009
    BlueFox wrote: »
    A technician with ISF training.
    http://www.imagingscience.com/

    does anyone around here swear by these ISF certified technicians being able to calibrate your tv in a way that you couldn't do yourself? I might be in the minority here, but I just can't justify paying a few hundred dollars for someone to come over and change some settings that are ultimately just up to my own subjective viewing preferences. I know having your tv calibrated 'correctly' is supposed to increase the life of the set, but personally I'd rather that the settings the way I like them the whole time and upgrade my tv a little sooner (assuming there is even anything wrong with the way I have it). I could put that extra money toward better equipment too!

    Maybe if I ever have cash to burn I'd do it just to see what the fuss is about. But for now, a calibration disc is the most I'd pay for that- and really I'm fine just popping in a few movies and messing with the settings in a real viewing situation until I have it where I like best.
  • Gaara
    Gaara Posts: 2,415
    edited January 2009
    manman wrote: »
    does anyone around here swear by these ISF certified technicians being able to calibrate your tv in a way that you couldn't do yourself? I might be in the minority here, but I just can't justify paying a few hundred dollars for someone to come over and change some settings that are ultimately just up to my own subjective viewing preferences. I know having your tv calibrated 'correctly' is supposed to increase the life of the set, but personally I'd rather that the settings the way I like them the whole time and upgrade my tv a little sooner (assuming there is even anything wrong with the way I have it). I could put that extra money toward better equipment too!

    Maybe if I ever have cash to burn I'd do it just to see what the fuss is about. But for now, a calibration disc is the most I'd pay for that- and really I'm fine just popping in a few movies and messing with the settings in a real viewing situation until I have it where I like best.

    Depends how into video you are. I personally went with AVIA for my 34in HD tube. Got as far as I could go with it and it wasn't good enough.

    Next step was the service menu. I spent DAYS researching the different variables to adjust, what each code meant, and hours playing with settings, doing demos, etc. I got it alot better...but it wasn't good enough.

    So I dropped the $ for a ISF certified technician, (Chad B) who spent ~3 hours and honestly the tv never looked better. The differences weren't huge, as I had already spent hours on it myself, but he fixed a few nagging problems, mainly a overscan issue and some convergence issues. The most noticeable difference was the greyscale, whites looked natural without being overly bright, and the blacks were pitch black, shadow detail was much improved. He also got rid of the little bit of red push that I had.

    Overall it was worth the $ I spent, even though I already did hours of work myself on it. I am definitely not the norm though, as I have physically modified my TV for better picture.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited January 2009
    Gaara wrote: »
    So I dropped the $ for a ISF certified technician, (Chad B) who spent ~3 hours and honestly the tv never looked better. The differences weren't huge, as I had already spent hours on it myself, but he fixed a few nagging problems, mainly a overscan issue and some convergence issues. The most noticeable difference was the greyscale, whites looked natural without being overly bright, and the blacks were pitch black, shadow detail was much improved. He also got rid of the little bit of red push that I had.

    Overall it was worth the $ I spent, even though I already did hours of work myself on it. I am definitely not the norm though, as I have physically modified my TV for better picture.

    I have to agree. If you know what you are doing, have access to the service menus, know how to input hexidecimal values, and have the correct test equipment, you might be able to do it yourself.

    The tech spent at least 3-4 hours working on my set. He had some tool that attached to the center of the screen and it provided input to a program on a laptop. Then he started adjusting all the color values, grayscale, convergience, and probably something else. He would get a low end asjustment okay, but it messed up the high-end. This went back and forth until he couldn't get it any better. It really was detailed, and a lot of effort. But the finished result is stunning. This was done on a 57" Hitachi CRT RPTV.

    If a noob with an adjustment DVD can equal this then they should go into business.

    Below is the TV setting, and I have not touched those values since, and the before and after adjustment values. Hope it shows up okay.


    Here are the user menu settings for your Hitachi:

    pic mode day
    cont 50
    br 38
    color 31
    tint +2
    sharp 50
    color temp standard
    blk enh off
    edge enh off
    color mgmt: all at 50%
    color decoding all at 50% except color at 31
    noise reduc off

    As you requested, here are your before and after data logs:
    <pre>
    "Before Cal x y Y fL Hz Kelvin DeltaC* R R% G G% B B% Meas User"
    "20 IRE 0.279 0.278 1.385 60 10,864 95.108 0.968 101.911 0.985 85.068 1.208 120.81 2.1 1.162"
    "30 IRE 0.281 0.264 3.181 60 11,931 100.621 1.022 107.641 0.962 83.067 1.255 125.526 2.1 2.834"
    "40 IRE 0.278 0.258 5.868 60 13,258 104.766 1.025 107.944 0.958 82.677 1.28 127.979 2.1 5.337"
    "50 IRE 0.273 0.257 9.44 60 14,642 107.103 0.996 104.857 0.965 83.363 1.289 128.903 1.9 8.720"
    "60 IRE 0.277 0.256 13.43 60 13,799 110.361 1.024 107.799 0.957 82.619 1.287 128.731 2.2 13.023"
    "70 IRE 0.273 0.253 18.799 60 15,557 113.964 1.013 106.646 0.958 82.689 1.305 130.534 2.1 18.281"
    "80 IRE 0.275 0.254 24.772 60 14,921 116.229 1.019 107.307 0.956 82.582 1.3 130.022 2.2 24.524"
    "90 IRE 0.279 0.26 31.925 60 12,808 115.982 1.023 107.672 0.96 82.855 1.272 127.154 2.2 31.778"
    "100 IRE 0.282 0.266 40.067 60 11,383 115.432 1.025 107.952 0.963 83.113 1.245 124.486 40.067"
    "
    "
    "After Cal X y Y fL Hz Kelvin DeltaC* R R% G G% B B% Meas User"
    "20 IRE 0.312 0.321 1.259 60 6,621 1.106 1.017 101.681 0.992 99.235 1.025 102.495 2 0.769"
    "30 IRE 0.322 0.325 2.798 60 6,054 2.05 1.054 105.422 0.983 98.314 1 99.964 1.9 1.876"
    "40 IRE 0.322 0.324 4.785 60 6,040 2.772 1.06 105.964 0.981 98.101 1.003 100.303 1.8 3.532"
    "50 IRE 0.314 0.325 7.122 60 6,460 1.214 1.017 101.704 0.994 99.386 1.01 100.977 1.7 5.771"
    "60 IRE 0.318 0.324 9.745 60 6,273 2.415 1.038 103.773 0.988 98.755 1.008 100.833 1.9 8.619"
    "70 IRE 0.317 0.328 13.074 60 6,264 1.507 1.025 102.526 0.993 99.266 0.997 99.666 2 12.098"
    "80 IRE 0.318 0.325 17.053 60 6,227 2.722 1.038 103.783 0.988 98.801 1.004 100.357 2 16.229"
    "90 IRE 0.317 0.326 21.466 60 6,288 2.251 1.029 102.919 0.991 99.084 1.003 100.252 2 21.030"
    "100 IRE 0.318 0.327 26.516 60 6,242 2.299 1.03 102.968 0.991 99.113 0.998 99.816 26.516"
    </pre>

    Apparently tags are not supported, or I did it wrong.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • manman
    manman Posts: 256
    edited January 2009
    yeah, I don't know about editing hex values in the service menu and stuff like that. I guess I don't know if the changes there are worth a few hundred dollars to me since I've never seen the differnce. But all the things you mentioned like this:

    pic mode day
    cont 50
    br 38
    color 31
    tint +2
    sharp 50
    color temp standard
    blk enh off
    edge enh off
    color mgmt: all at 50%
    color decoding all at 50% except color at 31
    noise reduc off

    All those things I can easily edit to my own liking by myself. Some tv's also give the user more options to adjust stuff like white balance etc outside of the service menu. The main thing about it to me is that even if there is some certain 'correct' way to have it for each tv, I think it really is up to the person watching to decide what kind of picture they like best. For example- some people might like more saturated color than others, or sharpness settings higher than others. Might be interesting to look into the service menu stuff though.
  • Gaara
    Gaara Posts: 2,415
    edited January 2009
    Fox, Calibrated projection TVs can look AMAZING. I have only seen a high end Hitatch that was calibrated, it was definitely a night and day difference from the ones we had in the store.

    Manman, you already answered your own question. "I guess I don't know if the changes there are worth a few hundred dollars to me since I've never seen the difference." Calibrating a TV is like calibrating a HT system, you can get everything perfect, but some like to run the sub hot. There is a right way to calibrate a TV, and the calibration disc can show you how, but some will still like it a little to bright with the sharpness jacked.

    As such I would recommend that you get a calibration disc like Digital Video Essentials. First write down the settings you know you like, then turn off all the extra "enhancements", turn down the brightness, turn down the sharpness, do EVERYTHING it says. Leave it like this for a few days, then watch a few scenes from a familiar movie, preferably some up close scenes w/people, some fast action, and some dark scenes. Then write down your current settings , and go back to the pre calibrated settings.

    One of three things will happen:

    A) You won't notice much of a difference
    B) You won't be able to believe you watched it like that before
    C) You will prefer the old settings

    The trick is to watch it with the new settings for a few days. We are conditioned to think an overly bright high contrast picture with over exaggerated colors is correct. Most people prefer a more natural look, but you need a few days to get used to it, if you immediately switch back the unrealistic look will look better.
  • manman
    manman Posts: 256
    edited January 2009
    Gaara wrote: »
    Manman, you already answered your own question. "I guess I don't know if the changes there are worth a few hundred dollars to me since I've never seen the difference." Calibrating a TV is like calibrating a HT system, you can get everything perfect, but some like to run the sub hot. There is a right way to calibrate a TV, and the calibration disc can show you how, but some will still like it a little to bright with the sharpness jacked.

    As such I would recommend that you get a calibration disc like Digital Video Essentials. First write down the settings you know you like, then turn off all the extra "enhancements", turn down the brightness, turn down the sharpness, do EVERYTHING it says. Leave it like this for a few days, then watch a few scenes from a familiar movie, preferably some up close scenes w/people, some fast action, and some dark scenes. Then write down your current settings , and go back to the pre calibrated settings.

    One of three things will happen:

    A) You won't notice much of a difference
    B) You won't be able to believe you watched it like that before
    C) You will prefer the old settings

    The trick is to watch it with the new settings for a few days. We are conditioned to think an overly bright high contrast picture with over exaggerated colors is correct. Most people prefer a more natural look, but you need a few days to get used to it, if you immediately switch back the unrealistic look will look better.


    I wasn't saying I like those settings jacked, I was just making the point that people like different things, so the 'correct' settings a person pays a few hundred dollars for may not actually be the settings they like. I'm the only one who knows what I like, so I trust myself to calibrate the settings I have easy access to. The service menu stuff is a separate ball game- I'm not as familiar with those, that's why I was saying I don't know if those would be worth it to me or not to pay for. When I originally asked the question I wasn't sure how much they do in the service menu portion and what difference it makes which is partly why I was asking. If it was just the regular settings they were tweaking, then I would be positive it's not worth it to me.

    What you said is basically what I usually do, although for me it doesn't take me long to notice if I like something or not. I usually calibrate using a few different movies- with dark scenes, with a more natural look, and one that is meant to have brighter colors. I tried the calibration feature that came with ratatouille the other day, just because I never noticed it before- but everythign looked fine where I had it. Anyway, my question has been answered- it sounds like you guys felt you got value out of paying for it.