A single receiver, or amp and pre amp.
nirvana3600
Posts: 13
Just want some advices on the difference of using a single receiver vs amp/pre amp.
Post edited by nirvana3600 on
Comments
-
What speakers are you trying to drive? Is this for a home theater or a stereo system? How big is the room? How loud do you want to listen?
Help us to help you!DKG999
HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED
Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC -
You need to give us a little more than that. What are you driving, what sources are you going to be using, room size, music taste, how loud do you want it? There are a few receivers that do work well, but you typically won't find them in a major store. A separate Pre/Amp combo gives you the ability to change out your Pre which gives about 90% of the sound signature. I like Pre/Amp combos for the reason just stated.
Ben
DKG beat me to it;)Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
Thanks
Ben -
Another vote for separate components.
Especially for HT, it's nice to be able to change out the pre every few years to go along with the latest technologies."He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche -
Another vote for separate components.
Especially for HT, it's nice to be able to change out the pre every few years to go along with the latest technologies.
Good advice but the preamps are always so far behind. Right now there is only 3 that can do what most receivers can do and it costs 25 to 30k. Krells new Evolution 707.
Integra and Marantz is your only other choice right now. Sucks but true.
I'd say for most systems, higher end receivers are all you need.Dan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time. -
You need to give us a little more than that. What are you driving, what sources are you going to be using, room size, music taste, how loud do you want it? There are a few receivers that do work well, but you typically won't find them in a major store. A separate Pre/Amp combo gives you the ability to change out your Pre which gives about 90% of the sound signature. I like Pre/Amp combos for the reason just stated.
Ben
DKG beat me to it;)
Why not both? A fairly high quality mid-range receiver coupled with one or more high quality amps. Swap out the receiver every few years to pick up all the new features and keep the amps forever. Start with a good 2/3/5 channel amp and use the receiver amps for the center/surrounds. Add more later.Sony 60'' SXRD 1080p
Amp = Carver AV-705THX 5-Channel
Processor = NAD T747
Panasonic BD35 Blu-Ray
Main = SDA-1C Studio with RD0s, spikes, XO rebuild, rings, I/C upgrade
Center=Polk CS10, Surround = Athena Dipoles, Sub= Boston 12HO
Music/Video Streaming = Netgear NEO550
TT = Audio Technica -
+1 Marty. A nice AVR with pre-outs coupled with a solid amp.My Main Gear
Mitsu HC5000 (Proj.)
Marantz SR8001 (AVR)
Sunfire TGA7200 (AMP)
Marantz DV7001 (SACD)
Samsung BD-P1500 Blu-Ray
LSi 15's (Front)
LSiC (Center)
LSiFx (Surrounds)
DUAL SVS 20-39 CS Plus (Passive Subs)
Marantz IS201 I-Pod Dock[/SIZE]
Panamax M5300EX
Carada Criterion 106" Brightwhite Screen
Sunfire TGA 5200 & (4) B&W 605's in the party room
