4 channel stereo receiver

danger boy
danger boy Posts: 15,722
edited December 2007 in Electronics
was slumming the local 2nd hand stores and ran across a low brand name 4 channel receiver.

can anyone shed some light on what a 4 channel receiver is? does it mean you hook up 4 speakers to it? two fronts and two rear?

was this some kind of pre surround sound type gimmick?
PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
Post edited by danger boy on

Comments

  • Shizelbs
    Shizelbs Posts: 7,433
    edited February 2005
    Is that the old quadraphonic deal?
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited February 2005
    could be a stereo receiver with 4 speaker capabilities or could even be Dolby Surround seeing those only used 4 speakers as well.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited February 2005
    the only info i could find on it was it was made from 1973 to 1975. it could be Quadraphonic stereo. it was old(er). the wanted like $15 for it. i passed.
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • Danny Tse
    Danny Tse Posts: 5,206
    edited February 2005
    You may want to post the question here, probably in the "Legacy MultiChannel Systems" (scroll towards the bottom of the page).
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    Freakin' kids. A 4 channel receiver is indicating to me that it is in fact an old surround sound receiver. You think surround sound happened with Dolby Surround? Some of the earliest surround receivers go back to the late 60's.

    Quadrophonic - Kind of a catch-all name started way back to indicate a system that was more than just two channel. The 4 channel systems could be comprised of Discrete 4 channel sound. Yes girls, 4 DISTINCTLY different channels of sound. It required a 4 channel receiver with discrete capability, a turntable with special cartridge, or a reel to reel machine with 4 discrete channels. There were pre-recorded discrete 4 channel tapes, and the turntables required specially pressed discrete 4 channel vinyl.

    Some different systems were called SQ, QS, Matrix, and then my all time favorite, Hafler DynaQuad. 73-75 is too early for Dolby Surround.

    More later, I'm at work. By now they don't actually expect me to work if I'm not flying, but I try not to rub it in their faces.

    If that is an old KLH 4 channel receiver, and it is affordable, buy it. Those mid-powered KLH's have some of the SWEETEST 2 channel sound you're likely to come across in a receiver. The most powerful KLH was about 30wpc if I remember correctly.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    Discrete 4 channel sound back then was a jungle. They really screwed it up.

    The best analogy I could give is, they would put a Beatle in each speaker. Well, how realistic is that? That is putting you onstage in the middle of the performers, rather than out in the orchestra Row 15 dead center. It was truly stupid sounding.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited February 2005
    I know surround sound didn't start with DS but he also didn't state how old it was at the time so I wasn't sure HOW old to guess. Figured I'd throw out another option other than the quadraphonic option already listed.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited February 2005
    Originally posted by George Grand
    Discrete 4 channel sound back then was a jungle. They really screwed it up.

    The best analogy I could give is, they would put a Beatle in each speaker. Well, how realistic is that? That is putting you onstage in the middle of the performers, rather than out in the orchestra Row 15 dead center. It was truly stupid sounding.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)


    I can't say much more for what I've heard of DVD-A and SACD multichannel. Most of them still put you in the middle of the stage. They have not learned. It is still about the WOW factor, not the music.

    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited February 2005
    Thanks George!

    I knew someone on here would know exactly what a 4 channel receiver was. You do a good job of explaining it as well.

    I had vaugely heard about it when i was in my early teens. I didn't know squat back then.. and didn't care. Now i'm just trying to catch up on stereo history.. so that's why i was curious about 4 channel sound.

    Sounds like it was a gimmick that didn't quite work. It's interesting to know that "surround" sound dates back to the 60's though. I had no idea. I know it didn't begin with Dolby Surround. But wasn't sure when or why.

    Unfortunately the receiver I found wasn't a KLH.. it was some other non worth brand.. who's name escapes me now. Maybe Sansui? not sure.
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • stereo55
    stereo55 Posts: 418
    edited February 2005
    Originally posted by danger boy
    Maybe Sansui? not sure.

    Some of the older Sansui's had great matrix decoders in them and considered "classics" .

    Can't remeber the model #'s at the moment but they had a yellow/purple (some green and purple) lighted dial with a four channel adjuster to left front of the receiver . The back consisted of up to EIGHT channel mixing adjusters . They got a classic write up in StereoPhile mag years back saying they had some of the best decoders ever incorporated into a reciever .
    I owned a pair of these recievers years ago when I was selling classic stuff and I could never keep enough of these Sansui's around . Iam sorry I ever sold mine as they had some heavy power (for their day) and the decoders were xint and alot of fun to play with .
    SDA-2B's ~ Pair SDA-CRS's ~ ,*** Main listening: Maggies MG1 ~ Polk SDA 2B's ~ Monitor 10's , 3-pairs (2 pairs moded into SDA's w/SDA-2B/CRS cross-overs) , * DCM TF600's * Mission M71/M72 *** Main brdrm FRT: RTiA-5's /Presence RTi-4 / LSI-704 Cntr / Rear FXI3's ~~~ Assorted Main listening rm : , 2- Heathkit W-5M /tube mono blocks (Parasound P/HP-850)* * 2- Altec Lansing 1590b's/mono blocks (Yamaha C-45) * CM Labs 35D * Dynaco ST-70 ~ Occasionally ~* Yamaha CR-820/A-760 ,* Sansui AU-317/AU-217 * Carver 900 rec *2-Dynaco ST 120* 1 Hafler DH-220* Marantz 1040 ... more
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    In my opinion, Hafler DynaQuad was the only halfway realistic surround sound from that era.

    DynaQuad did not use the rear channels as discrete, separate channels. They were used as ambience channels, and could really come very close to imitating the original recording venue. The back channels were also dissimilar, and therefore, STEREO. Even Dolby Surround was mono to the back channels, using amplitude and phasing to try and move sounds from side to side in the rear.

    Hafler DynaQuad was built into quite a few receivers. KLH and Sherwood immediately come to mind. There was also a stand alone outboard DynaQuad decoder available from Hafler (Dynaco), called The Dynaco Quadaptor. I still have one. It could be added to ANY stereo receiver, or power amp. I think it was recommended for only up to 100 watts, but that didn't stop me from using one with my Carver "150" Receiver (157wpc) to drive 4 Polk RTA 11T's from around 1989-1990. Sounded GREAT! Here's a picture.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    A technical error has occured. That is my "Gorilla Playing a Set of Drums" alarm clock. Here's the Quadaptor.........
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    It was a passive device, detracting NOTHING from the front channels. Cool man item if there ever was one.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • dkg999
    dkg999 Posts: 5,647
    edited February 2005
    At one time in my life, setting in my room with Deep Purple's Machine Head playing on a Dual turntable thru a Marantz 4400 receiver with full quadraphonic sound connected to AR3 speakers was just about the ultimate. Throw in a smuggled bottle of Southern Comfort and the girlfriend of the moment ..... wow ...... I think some residue from the 70's just kicked loose.

    It was good though!
    DKG999
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC
  • Polkersince85
    Polkersince85 Posts: 2,883
    edited February 2005
    I had bought a Pioneer SX-1000tw in high school (still got it playing) and didn't get into the Quad stuff. Had a set of Utah Speakers hooked to it.. kicking out Led Zep and other late 60/70 stuff, with the bass turned up.
    Picture is not of mine but it's identical.
    >
    >
    >This message has been scanned by the NSA and found to be free of harmful intent.<
  • uncyogi
    uncyogi Posts: 24
    edited February 2005
    just an observation from a new member; it tickles me to see how a thread that started out with a technical question about an unknown product can lead to a 'residue' related 70's flashback ! As an aside, I recall reading somewhere that when Disney was putting "Fantasia" together, old Walt wanted the audience to hear the bee in "Flight of the Bumblebee" flying all around them, not just from the front of the theater, and surround was born.
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited February 2005
    I'm not familiar with Fantasia. A theater filled with speakers could still get a "surround" type effect by directing a mono signal sequentially to each speaker until the circle had been completed.

    Doesn't surprise me that Walt Disney "envisioned" a surround experience.

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • uncyogi
    uncyogi Posts: 24
    edited February 2005
    I'm not familiar with Fantasia. A theater filled with speakers could still get a "surround" type effect by directing a mono signal sequentially to each speaker until the circle had been completed.

    your thought of a sequentially rotated mono signal made me curious, so I had to google. Front three channels-main sound track.Two rear channels-seperate spool of film... surround. As for being unfamiliar with Fantasia; if you're a lover of music, not just the gear that reproduces it, drop what you're doing and get ahold of a copy! It's a must see.
  • unc2701
    unc2701 Posts: 3,587
    edited February 2005
    Hey, I still use my stand alone quad decoder!!! You just run it to your multichannel input... Dark Side of the Moon in Quad w/ Wizard of Oz on the tube, anyone?

    I've even heard of people recording old quad records onto their computer, then encoding them to a DTS/ Dolby digital stream. Yeah, too much free time.

    BTW if you run across a fosgate quad processor, grab it- I've never heard one, but they go for $$$ on Ebay. Sansui is pretty good and some do both QS and SQ... my dad yardsaled his sansui before I could snatch it, so I'm stuck w/ a panasonic. Just make sure the quad flavor (SQ, QS, etc) is the same on it as the record you're wanting to play
    Gallo Ref 3.1 : Bryston 4b SST : Musical fidelity CD Pre : VPI HW-19
    Gallo Ref AV, Frankengallo Ref 3, LC60i : Bryston 9b SST : Meridian 565
    Jordan JX92s : MF X-T100 : Xray v8
    Backburner:Krell KAV-300i
  • Exploseph
    Exploseph Posts: 1
    edited December 2007
    I'm sorry, this is COMPLETELY off topic, but may I ask where you got that gorilla alarm clock from? I lost mine years ago and have been desperately trawling the web trying to find at least a picture of it, and this is the first and only one I have found. Would very much appreciate it if you got in contact with me. Thanks!
  • dipiazza
    dipiazza Posts: 363
    edited December 2007
    Exploseph wrote: »
    I'm sorry, this is COMPLETELY off topic, but may I ask where you got that gorilla alarm clock from? I lost mine years ago and have been desperately trawling the web trying to find at least a picture of it, and this is the first and only one I have found. Would very much appreciate it if you got in contact with me. Thanks!

    "Club Polk: The place for sound audio adivice and rare drum smashing gorilla alarm clocks."

    Welcome to the club!
    Terps Swimming!
    HT Setup
    TV: Vizio VX32L
    Reciever: Pioneer VSX-D914
    HD-DVD Player: Toshiba HD-A2
    Fronts: Polk R50s
    Surounds: Polk R30s
    Center: Polk R20's
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39PCi

    2CH Setup
    Integrated: Onix SP3 Tube
    CD Player: Sony CDP-CX355
    Speakers: Onix Strata Mini in PR Finish
    Signal Cable: Classic Speaker, Analog 1 IC

    Headphones
    Grado SR 60, Bang & Olufsen A8, Shure e3

    Other Stuff in Use
    Onix xls, Dual Onix x-subs, Onix Ref .5, Dahlquist M903, Teac A-1D, Marantz 1060