Qobuz vs Tidal

So I just signed up for the trial with Qobuz in the top tier (streaming not the one with purchase discounts). I am curious of what I have been reading about the quality of music albeit a lesser offering of albums.
I’ll be doing some a/b comparisons with the same song over the next couple of weeks and will post my opinions here.
Please feel free to add if you have experience with both, would love to hear your thoughts.
For reference :
Auralic Vega G1
Stellar stack with monos
Elac Adante’s
Audioquest wires and power conditioning.
«1

Comments

  • verb
    verb Posts: 10,176
    edited June 2019
    Ya know Joe, following your journey, well, is fun! Looking forward to the thoughts! :smile:

    Dang dude, I just got Tidal! :smile:
    Basement: Polk SDA SRS 1.2tl's, Cary SLP-05 Pre with ultimate upgrade,McIntosh MCD301 CD/SACD player, Northstar Designs Excelsio DAC, Cambridge 851N streamer, McIntosh MC300 Amp, Silnote Morpheus Ref2, Series2 Digital Cables, Silnote Morpheus Ref2 Series2 XLR's, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Pangea Power Cables, MIT Shotgun S3 IC's, MIT Shotgun S1 Bi-Wire speaker cables
    Office: PC, EAR Acute CD Player, EAR 834L Pre, Northstar Designs Intenso DAC, Antique Sound Labs AV8 Monoblocks, Denon UDR-F10 Cassette, Acoustic Technologies Classic FR Speakers, SVS SB12 Plus sub, MIT AVt2 speaker cables, IFI Purifier2, AQ Cinnamon USB cable, Groneberg Quatro Reference IC's
    Spare Room: Dayens Ampino Integrated Amp, Tjoeb 99 tube CD player (modified Marantz CD-38), Analysis Plus Oval 9's, Zu Jumpers, AudioEngine B1 Streamer, Klipsch RB-61 v2, SVS PB1000 sub, Blue Jeans RCA IC's, Shunyata Hydra 8 Power Conditioner
    Living Room: Peachtree Nova Integrated, Cambridge CXN v2 Streamer, Rotel RCD-1072 CD player, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Polk RT265 In Wall Speakers, Polk DSW Pro 660wi sub
    Garage #1: Cambridge Audio 640A Integrated Amp, Project Box-E BT Streamer, Polk Tsi200 Bookies, Douglas Speaker Cables, Shunyata Power Conditioner
    Garage #2: Cambridge Audio EVO150 Integrated Amplifier, Polk L200's, Analysis Plus Silver Oval 2 Speaker Cables, IC's TBD.
  • kharp1
    kharp1 Posts: 3,453
    I'm very curious on comparisons between the two. Interface, selection, SQ and equipment used.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    Ok so here is my first in depth comparison between the two with a track I am quite familiar with.

    a0v97dtj2kcn.png

    To make it a fair comparison, both were played at 44.1. The 32bit depth is something the Auralic does to the 16 bit file but both tracks were advertised as streaming the same quality.

    The best way I know how to compare with regards to describing differences is to tell you what was added to it with one vs the other. In this case it was Qobuz adding.

    In the Q version, I had the addition of the following:

    The beginning of the song starts with two guitars strumming. The right guitar is closer than the left. And the left is further off center than the right. This is accentuated with the Qobuz track. To the point of giving a greater sense to the size of the recording space.

    The other detail I can hear in regards to the guitars is the actual instruments lowest tone when the strings are struck. I can hear the space inside the guitar like soft percussion or “thump”. This is not anywhere near as noticeable on the Tidal version

    When the piano starts in softly, it’s off to the left of center. The song starts in with one chord, then adds a double. In that double there is a reverb between the piano strings that I have a hard time picking up in Tidal.

    Lastly the singing is slightly right of center. The main difference I hear is the space around the singer. I get more width and front to back depth of recording space. Especially behind me. Amazing how much detail is here in the decay of the voice.

    More to come.
  • kharp1
    kharp1 Posts: 3,453
    Great info, thanks Joe. Look forward to more.
  • Clipdat
    Clipdat Posts: 12,557
    I think that upscaling/upsampling feature that it does to go from 16 to 32 might be something you can temporarily disable, just for the sake of comparison.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    Drew I looked through the menus both on the device and in the lightning DS app, couldn’t find any toggle or change for that?

    Here’s another comparison which only brings up more questions for me, this time around it’s Mercy Street by Peter Gabriel

    zm4iv6d0fha8.png

    This is another track that I’ve listen to probably close to 1000 times over the last 30 years. It’s a fantastic vocal and a light instrumental track that has some beautiful tones and percussion, I find it a mesmerizing song.

    Honestly this track was very very hard to find any differences between the two services. The only very slight difference that I could find were some of the spatial background vocals that were meant to be wider then the main front vocal. Those seem to spread just a little wider on the Qobuz version.
    But again, very small difference. Not like the first track.

    More to come
  • Clipdat
    Clipdat Posts: 12,557
    joecoulson wrote: »
    Drew I looked through the menus both on the device and in the lightning DS app, couldn’t find any toggle or change for that?

    Perhaps not. I thought I read that it could be defeated but I could be wrong. Shrug.

  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    So here is a good one!

    Although it’s good to A/B the similar files (44.1 CD quality) one of the reasons I was intrigued by Qobuz was there higher res (non-MQA) files. Looking briefly over the last couple of days they are readily available in most music styles but I have been disappointed with some specific albums not yet available. That being said, it’s nice to put two of the top file types up against each other.

    This time it’s Yes-Changes. Love this track with so much dynamics and imaging. One of my go to reference tracks for sure.

    Here I am going to post an image from each company. First up is the Tidal version. It’s an MQA at 48k.

    2drm9wpildlm.png

    Next is the Qobuz version. It’s a Flac with 96k and because I have seen this file type on another forum with them, I am pretty sure it’s 24bit (upsampled to 32 in the G1)

    2eliprbcshbf.png


    This one is the opposite of the conclusions regarding Mercy Steeet. The dynamics, soundstage width and height, how far the music expands pas my towers are all magnified with the Qobuz version. Absolutely engaging and really too many details to describe. The height is the imaging extends to almost behind my head. I have no wall to the right of my listening space, but some of the sounds are coming 90 degrees right of my listening position. This one is obvious.
  • Clipdat
    Clipdat Posts: 12,557
    Well no surprise there.

    180507_MQA_CA.jpg
  • codycatalist
    codycatalist Posts: 2,662
    I had similar experiences with Qobuz. I felt it's strongest trait was Soundstage, on most songs it put Tidal to shame.

    I left due to lack of available music.
    Just a dude doing dude-ly things

    "Temptation is the manifestation of desire which equals necessity." - Mikey081057
    " I have always had a champange taste with a beer budget" - Rick88
    "Just because the thread is getting views don't mean much .. I like a good train wreck doesn't mean i want to be in one..." - pitdogg2
    "Those that don't know, don't know that they don't know." - heiney9
    "Audiophiles are the male equivalent of cat ladies." - Audiokarma Member
  • kharp1
    kharp1 Posts: 3,453
    Great to hear that it's a clearly better than Tidal, but, sux that the selection isn't as good. Hopefully they can expand their library.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    I concur with Cody completely. The sound seems to just be step or two above Tidal. I just can’t find any of the Electronic music I love on there. It’s all on Tidal. Might buy one or two months after the trial to further the experience but not sure after that.

    The Lighting DS app on the Auralic is so darn slick. I can A/b so easily with it. It culminates all music into one searchable source. My library/internet radio/Tidal/Qobuz all show results from a single search
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,288
    https://forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/185466/qobuz/p1

    In that thread, I put some notes on what I found between the 2. Qobuz just seams to have more air and space, a bit more natural sounding vs tidal or even tidal mqa. I have noticed not everything is in Qobuz. Tidal has a lot more. It could be Qobuz is still adding stuff but. My wife is a student so I get to use her student discount for Tidal. Qobuz, I did a year in advance so it was cheaper and have both for now.
    Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista 300, Audioquest Thunderbird Zero Speaker Cable, Tyler Highland H2, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    This one just blows it out of the park. The vocals are so crisp considering the recording is almost 60 years old! They are well balanced by the percussion, sax & piano across the soundstage.

    Stunning

    yq14x9v4ajsk.png
  • Clipdat
    Clipdat Posts: 12,557
    edited July 2019
    I'm a big fan of Tidal, especially through my CXN V2 using the excellent and snappy Cambridge Connect app. Nothing is more irritating than a slow to respond or sloppily programmed app. Although there is the occasional glitch when adding songs to my one-time playlist, the app as a whole is very nice. The luxury and convenience of being able to control my music listening experience this way has completely elevated and enhanced my enjoyment and the way I listen.

    However, I don't think Tidal is a 100% replacement for CDs (or FLACs from CD rips stored locally or on a NAS device). It's close, but it's not quite there yet in terms of consistency, especially for critical listening.

    I had an experience the other day where I wanted to hear the "Hideaki Yoshioka Trio - Moment to Moment" (Original by Henry Mancini) from this album that I own: https://www.amazon.com/Venus-Jazz-Wine-Various-artists/dp/B0139QWF2C

    I played it in Tidal (labeled as 16 bit FLAC) and the piano sounded harsh, shrill, and unpleasant. Annoyed, I got up, and put in the CD to my cold and just turned on Njoe Tjoeb 4000. Within a few minutes into the song, I was brought to tears by the beautiful sound of the piano.

    So I went from being irritated and annoyed, to having a profoundly emotional listening experience.

    I guess this just shows that you can't always rely on Tidal's audio quality for certain releases.
  • codycatalist
    codycatalist Posts: 2,662
    Yeah I got a Denon Universal Player from a member here a little while ago. Slowly building up my collection again but if I have it on CD I go for that over streaming 6 times a week and twice on Sundays.

    I think I picked up like 40 CDs from my local Goodwill on 50% off day a week or two ago.

    Yeah they had THAT many good albums, I was surprised. I use Tidal for the stuff that is harder to find or expensive CD releases from Japan and what not.
    Just a dude doing dude-ly things

    "Temptation is the manifestation of desire which equals necessity." - Mikey081057
    " I have always had a champange taste with a beer budget" - Rick88
    "Just because the thread is getting views don't mean much .. I like a good train wreck doesn't mean i want to be in one..." - pitdogg2
    "Those that don't know, don't know that they don't know." - heiney9
    "Audiophiles are the male equivalent of cat ladies." - Audiokarma Member
  • Thorton
    Thorton Posts: 1,324
    Qobuz vs Tidal: Two great streaming services for the music lover.

    For music selection/library, I found this to be a wash. Some recordings were missing on Tidal and different ones missing on Qobuz. Qobuz had more hi-rez versions of the songs I listened to.

    When it comes to overall sound, I found that both services sounded very good. If you never heard them side by side or didn’t have a big collection of ripped Flac and SACD files, you’d be very pleased with the sound from either. In the numerous tracks that I listened to I unanimously preferred Qobuz over Tidal for sound quality. I also thought my ripped recordings sounded better (most of the times) than both streaming options. If I ranked the options, ripped CD/SACD ≥ Qobuz > Tidal. I never selected Tidal as the best version. I do not have an MQA dac which could alter my preference. And I can’t confirm every track I listened to was from the same mastering. If I had to explain the sound differences, I’d say that Qobuz was very good and close to the CD recording. It has a dynamic, true type of sound. One or two recordings did sound a little thin. Tidal while many recordings sounded good, it did sound a little processed (probably not the right terminology). The upper region was slightly missing on a number of tracks giving it a rounded off feel. Bass seemed to be less tight and smooth on some recordings. While some may prefer this, I didn’t. I’m being critical on pointing these out since the overall sound was very close.

    As far as the overall use/app, finding new music and playing; I found both to be comparable and very easy to use especially with Roon. I played (a little bit) with the Qobuz mobile app which was also easy to use.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________
    Ethernet Filter: GigaFOILv4 with Keces P3 LPS
    Source: Roon via ethernet to DAC interface
    DAC: Bricasti M1SE
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV8805
    Tube Preamp Buffer: Tortuga TPB.V1
    Amp1: Nord One NC1200DM Signature, Amp2: W4S MC-5, AMP3: W4S MMC-7
    Front: Salk SoundScape 8's, Center: Salk SoundScape C7
    Surround: Polk FXIA6, Surround Back: Polk RTIA9, Atmos: Polk 70-RT
    Subs: 2 - Rythmik F25's
    IC & Speaker Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, Signal Cable
    Power Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, PS Audio
    Room Treatments: GIK Acoustics
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    Yes but being critical with the source is definitely the point. Even slight gains are to be recognized and welcomed. I prefer Qobuz for best streaming sound quality but Tidal for library. And my own rips for best sound quality.
  • Thorton
    Thorton Posts: 1,324
    I agree. Except for the library for me is close based on what I listen to. If tidal was the only option, I’d still keep buying CD’s and not pay for tidal. Yes, it’s great to find new music but there are cheaper ways. So far, Qobuz has me deciding: do I keep buying CD’s or completely switch to streaming. I will still buy some CD’s for the quality.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________
    Ethernet Filter: GigaFOILv4 with Keces P3 LPS
    Source: Roon via ethernet to DAC interface
    DAC: Bricasti M1SE
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV8805
    Tube Preamp Buffer: Tortuga TPB.V1
    Amp1: Nord One NC1200DM Signature, Amp2: W4S MC-5, AMP3: W4S MMC-7
    Front: Salk SoundScape 8's, Center: Salk SoundScape C7
    Surround: Polk FXIA6, Surround Back: Polk RTIA9, Atmos: Polk 70-RT
    Subs: 2 - Rythmik F25's
    IC & Speaker Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, Signal Cable
    Power Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, PS Audio
    Room Treatments: GIK Acoustics
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    I just know I’m missing my G1 like crazy. I’m wearing out my vinyl. Hurry up Auralic!!
  • gudnoyez
    gudnoyez Posts: 8,056
    edited July 2019
    Thorton wrote: »
    I agree. Except for the library for me is close based on what I listen to. If tidal was the only option, I’d still keep buying CD’s and not pay for tidal. Yes, it’s great to find new music but there are cheaper ways. So far, Qobuz has me deciding: do I keep buying CD’s or completely switch to streaming. I will still buy some CD’s for the quality.

    I agree to some extent, let's say your collection of physical media is huge a d you pretty much have all the stuff you already need? As far as new releases from your favorite artists. when was the last time you heard a well mastered non compressed CD? If you got a large collection I'm going to play from it, before I would Stream it.

    I do have Tidal the Wife Spotify, I had Quboz, and agree that it would be the one to choose if your lacking as far as a music library goes. I will keep Tidal as I only stream the new stuff, or something obscure that maybe I'm missing. If your Library is limited than Quboz HI Res would definitely be the route one should take.
    Home Theater
    Parasound Halo A 31 OnkyoTX-NR838 Sony XBR55X850B 55" 4K RtiA9 Fronts CsiA6 Center RtiA3 Rears FxiA6 Side Surrounds Dual Psw 111's Oppo 105D Signal Ultra Speaker Cables & IC's Signal Magic Power Cable Technics SL Q300 Panamax MR4300 Audioquest Chocolate HDMI Cables Audioquest Forest USB Cable

    2 Channel
    Adcom 555II Vincent SA-T1 Marantz SA 15S2 Denon DR-M11 Clearaudio Bluemotion SDA 2.3tl's (Z) edition MIT Terminator II Speaker Cables & IC's Adcom 545II Adcom Gtp-450 Marantz CD5004 Technics M245X SDA 2B's, SDA CRS+

    Stuff for the Head
    JD LABS C5 Headphone Amplifier, Sennheiser HD 598, Polk Audio Buckle, Polk Audio Hinge, Velodyne vPulse, Bose IE2, Sennheiser CX 200 Street II, Sennheiser MX 365

    Shower & Off the beaten path Rigs
    Polk Audio Boom Swimmer, Polk Audio Urchin B)
  • Thorton
    Thorton Posts: 1,324
    Good points Steve. It’s great that both of these music services offer higher quality with good libraries for the main music system. There are many good services now based on quality and price. Everyone’s situation, needs and price point are different and it’s great to have so many good options. A couple of years back I didn’t think I would be paying for a music streaming service and instead would just keep buying CD’s.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________
    Ethernet Filter: GigaFOILv4 with Keces P3 LPS
    Source: Roon via ethernet to DAC interface
    DAC: Bricasti M1SE
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV8805
    Tube Preamp Buffer: Tortuga TPB.V1
    Amp1: Nord One NC1200DM Signature, Amp2: W4S MC-5, AMP3: W4S MMC-7
    Front: Salk SoundScape 8's, Center: Salk SoundScape C7
    Surround: Polk FXIA6, Surround Back: Polk RTIA9, Atmos: Polk 70-RT
    Subs: 2 - Rythmik F25's
    IC & Speaker Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, Signal Cable
    Power Cables: Acoustic Zen, Wireworld, PS Audio
    Room Treatments: GIK Acoustics
  • verb
    verb Posts: 10,176
    joecoulson wrote: »
    I just know I’m missing my G1 like crazy. I’m wearing out my vinyl. Hurry up Auralic!!

    I must've missed it Joe. What's happening with your G1?
    Basement: Polk SDA SRS 1.2tl's, Cary SLP-05 Pre with ultimate upgrade,McIntosh MCD301 CD/SACD player, Northstar Designs Excelsio DAC, Cambridge 851N streamer, McIntosh MC300 Amp, Silnote Morpheus Ref2, Series2 Digital Cables, Silnote Morpheus Ref2 Series2 XLR's, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Pangea Power Cables, MIT Shotgun S3 IC's, MIT Shotgun S1 Bi-Wire speaker cables
    Office: PC, EAR Acute CD Player, EAR 834L Pre, Northstar Designs Intenso DAC, Antique Sound Labs AV8 Monoblocks, Denon UDR-F10 Cassette, Acoustic Technologies Classic FR Speakers, SVS SB12 Plus sub, MIT AVt2 speaker cables, IFI Purifier2, AQ Cinnamon USB cable, Groneberg Quatro Reference IC's
    Spare Room: Dayens Ampino Integrated Amp, Tjoeb 99 tube CD player (modified Marantz CD-38), Analysis Plus Oval 9's, Zu Jumpers, AudioEngine B1 Streamer, Klipsch RB-61 v2, SVS PB1000 sub, Blue Jeans RCA IC's, Shunyata Hydra 8 Power Conditioner
    Living Room: Peachtree Nova Integrated, Cambridge CXN v2 Streamer, Rotel RCD-1072 CD player, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Polk RT265 In Wall Speakers, Polk DSW Pro 660wi sub
    Garage #1: Cambridge Audio 640A Integrated Amp, Project Box-E BT Streamer, Polk Tsi200 Bookies, Douglas Speaker Cables, Shunyata Power Conditioner
    Garage #2: Cambridge Audio EVO150 Integrated Amplifier, Polk L200's, Analysis Plus Silver Oval 2 Speaker Cables, IC's TBD.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    Screen issues. Got a new one on the way.
    Very weird and non common screen failure.
    Like Drew said, prob the least expensive thing on the Auralic.
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    Sucks too because I’m burning up most of my free month on Qobuz waiting for the replacement.
  • txcoastal1
    txcoastal1 Posts: 13,124
    edited July 2019
    Not to railroad your thread Joe, but the latest Tidal update included a "My Mix" feature that accumulates "as likes" and creates mixes due to listening habits. I know others have this type of feature.

    So far I like the new feature. It also shows that Tidal is progressively making changes which is a good thing as time goes.

    One out of ten songs I may not care for in these mixes, but not bad. I am a mood music guy. At any given time I can go from rock to Jazz to classical. This feature has built out 6 "My MIX" playlists incorporating my moods/genre.

    https://tidal.com/mymix
    2-channel: Modwright KWI-200 Integrated, Dynaudio C1-II Signatures
    Desktop rig: LSi7, Polk 110sub, Dayens Ampino amp, W4S DAC/pre, Sonos, JRiver
    Gear on standby: Melody 101 tube pre, Unison Research Simply Italy Integrated
    Gone to new homes: (Matt Polk's)Threshold Stasis SA12e monoblocks, Pass XA30.5 amp, Usher MD2 speakers, Dynaudio C4 platinum speakers, Modwright LS100 (voltz), Simaudio 780D DAC

    erat interfectorem cesar et **** dictatorem dicere a
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    That’s a good feature that’s lost in some proprietary apps for gear.
  • rooftop59
    rooftop59 Posts: 7,952
    So I have been running both for a couple months, and I do have to agree that qobuz is ever so slightly sonically superior, especially well recorded hi-Rez material. Unfortunately they are missing a number of albums we regularly listen to, and I think my wife would lose her mind if I switched services again. She’s finally gotten to where she regularly uses Tidal during workouts and long drives. She would probably like Spotify better, so perhaps I’ll keep qobuz and get her a Spotify account...
    Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es; Squeezebox Touch with Bolder Power Supply
    Game Room 5.1.4:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra

    Bedroom 2.1
    Cambridge Azur 551r; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer
  • joecoulson
    joecoulson Posts: 4,943
    I agree completely
    The selections in Tidal make it a winner overall.