Bi amping SDA 3.1 speakers?
Options
ThomasR
Posts: 14
I've had my SRS 3.1 speakers since I bought them new back in day. I'm looking at some things to spice them up a little (tweeter, crossover mods) . One thing on my mind is bi amping them. I have a Adcom GFA-545 amp 100 watts, I have access to another one. Is there noticeable benefit to bi amping? I thought I would get some opinions before buying a bunch of speaker wire.
Comments
-
OH you are about to open a can of worms style debate!!
(meaning it depends on with whom you talk. Also please remember you need an isolation transformer in your crossfeed cable. I.E. an AI-1 OR a dreadnaught if you're doing upgrades)
I STRONGLY recommend either having @vr3 do your crossovers or talking to @westmassguy if what Trey charges is a bit steep.
I have heard biamping to good effect and to no effect myself btw.
It depends a LOT on the speakers and equipment. -
Seems like a lot of effort to separate two tweeters from the rest of the drivers. If you have an amplifier that can power the speakers as-is...I'm not sure you're really gaining anything but expense and complexity.
-
Getting a better amp will net greater pleasure.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Getting a better amp will net greater pleasure.
I hear you on a better amp, I'm just trying to use what I have available to improve the sound with as little additional $$ as possible outside of improving the speakers. The additional Adcom amp is a freebie. I have RD0 198 tweeters on the way and installing them is about it it for my tech abilities. Woodworking is my forte, I can build a nice chair to sit and listen to them, that's about it. -
I don't think Bi-Amping the 3.1TL's, with only one tweeter per cabinet, would be very beneficial. Bi-Wiring "might" be a better option.
Or, get some better quality jumpers on the Binding Posts and a better Amplifier as Jesse has recommended.
The 3.1's are VERY easy to drive, Bi-Amping would be a waste of time/money IMHO. -
Well strike one on that idea. I'm trying figure out best bang for the buck, so let me toss this out there. I'm running the amp off an Adcom GTP-500 preamp. It had good reviews when I bought it (1990ish) but probably not the best these days. What effect does the preamp have on the overall sound and is that something worth looking into as a way to improve the sound?
-
There certainly are better preamps. Even so, I bet that Adcom is no slouch.
I admit that I never had an interest in the Tuner/Preamps. I had a GFP-565 for a couple years, liked it a lot. It went away when I went multi-channel with a preamp/processor. -
As much as I’ve enjoyed the perks of NO passive filters* in my system, unless you have a thorough understanding of those XOs, I believe going active would likely be a step back.Getting a better amp will net greater pleasure.
* tri-amping
Tony
Samsung 60" UN60ES6100 LED Outlaw Audio 976 Pre/Pro Samsung BDP, Amazon Firestick, Phillips CD Changer Canare 14 ga - LCR tweeters inside*; Ctr Ch outside BJC 10 ga - LCR mids, inside* & out 8 ga Powerline: LR woofers, inside* & out *soldered LR: Tri-amped RTi A7 w/Rotels. Woofers - 980BX; Tweets & “Plugged*” Mids - 981, connected w/MP Premiere ICs Ctr Ch: Rotel RB981 -> Bi-amped CSi A6 Surrounds: Premiere ICs ->Rotel 981 -> AR 12 ga -> RTi A3. 5 Subs: Sunfire True SW Signature -> LFE & Ctr Ch; 4 Audio Pro Evidence @ the “Corners”. Power Conditioning & Distribution: 4 dedicated 20A feeds; APC H15; 5 Furman Miniport 20s *Xschop's handy work
