Super Video or Component Video

Hello fellow polksters, santa came early this year aka (mastercard). I just ordered my front projection system. I wrote a previous thread on the overwhelming benifits of them over huge rear projections systems. Not to many responses though. Anyhow this projector is what they call HD compatable. Which I under stand to be such if the source is HD, say a standard DVD, that it will project it as such. The only other time this term has been used is on the Mit. TV's and meant that later on you had to buy a $1000 add on. My question-- is there a big difference running component video or super video? I understand that component got a big boost because of HD video. I am already invested in super video. No one seems to be able to answer this question. They say to try both (well duh) but I have in invest in component cable to find out, $100 to $200 bucks. Can any home theater buffs out there clear this up for me? Thanks Scottie
PS - if anyone has good advise on setting up a front projection system, my eyes are open.
PS - if anyone has good advise on setting up a front projection system, my eyes are open.
Post edited by scottvamp on
Comments
madmax
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
Aaron
http://members.aol.com/ajaynejr/compon.htm
Thanks,
madmax
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
2) Component video
3) S-Video
4) Composite
If your TV have the component video inputs, use them..., picture quality is much better than S-video....