W/C is better rti70, rti100 or rti150?

Options
doggie750
doggie750 Posts: 1,160
edited December 2003 in Speakers
Need to know asap coz i got a good deal @ circuit city for rti150 for $219 each (open item). I have csi40 and fxi30 with no sub. I have a new pair of rti100 and thinking of replacing it with the 150s. Is this worth it? Running on SONY 1070 right now and thinking of getting a ADCOM to power my floor front spkrs.

Thank you.
:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:
Godspeed,
D0661E

AVR:Pioneer Elite SC-07
Surrounds: RTis
2channel:Rti100 (carver driven
Sub:SVS PB12-Plus/2
Dedicated AMPs:Adcom GFA535, 2xCarver 1.5t, Carver m1.0t
Wsrn:Hitachi ultra vision LCD60, 32XBR400
PowerConditioner: MonsterC HTS5100
PS3, Toshiba HD A2, etc: SonySACD/ Panasonic gears DIVX.


MR3LIGION: Polkaudio; GSXR; E46; Reeftank;
Odyclub; Xsimulator; Sony; Zune; Canon
Post edited by doggie750 on

Comments

  • TheMaster
    TheMaster Posts: 184
    edited December 2003
    Options
    I know there are a couple of threads that were posted here before. If you will look around this forum, you'll know that the 70s is the right way to go. I just don't have the specialty yet to explain to you why they stand out from the rest?

    Somebody! help the new member out for crying out loud!

    I will give you the link once I find the threads....;)

    glenn
    HT:

    DENON AVR-3803
    DENON DVM-1805
    SONY DVP-NS300

    SONY 36' HDTV Wega

    ADCOM GFA-555
    ADCOM GFA-555
    ADCOM GFA-2535
    ADCOM ACE-515

    POLK RTi70's (Bi-Amped)
    POLK CSi40
    POLK FXi30's
    POLK RTi38's
    POLK CSi20
    POLK PSW 450
    SVS PB2 Plus

    2 CH Stereo:

    AudioSource Pre/Amp 1
    Hafler DH-500
    Sony CDP-CX235
    Monster Cable HTS3500

    SDA SRS 2.3tl
  • dave shepard
    dave shepard Posts: 1,334
    edited December 2003
    Options
    The 150's require alot more power to run at there fullest compared to the 100's or 70's. The 100's would be better if your power was in question but IMO at the cost of the mids. The 70's will give you better mid but at the cost of the lows and would be better run with a sub.

    In order they would be IMO.
    150's W/enough power best all around (high, mid, low's)
    100's (high, low's) lacking in mids
    70's (high, mid's) lacking in lows

    In the end it's your ears that will tell you wich way to go, if you eventually go with a sub. then the 70's IMO would be best.

    Good luck

    Dave
  • 4_everyman
    4_everyman Posts: 50
    edited December 2003
    Options
    I own a pair of RTi150s. I auditioned them alongside RTi100s and RTi70s and i have to agree with Dave Shepard's analysis of the three.

    I found that with adequate amplification, the RTi150s were the most pleasing to my ears. I'm bi-amping my RTi150s and, after having them for 1.5 months, they still take my breath away sometimes.

    Rgds,
    --Pete
  • Solaris
    Solaris Posts: 19
    edited December 2003
    Options
    I had my RTi150's ran on the Denon AVR3801 (100wx7) for months and the Denon never clipped (I don't turn it up beyond -10 db) before I got an Adcom GFA5500 to power them. I can tell you that the 150s can reach lower, and sound better with the Adcom. So, if you are going to get the 150's, I would recommend saving up another $600 on a used 200 wpc minimum amp to power them properly.

    With the Adcom, each 150 reached lows beyond my previously own PSW350. But that was not enough, I went out and got a SVS PB1-ISD and place it in the rear of the room opposite the 150s. I set my AVR3801 on Main+LFE for the bass signal, and now I am in heaven: tight, strong, quick and clear bass all around.

    So, the 150s sound great with a multi-channel receiver, but they sound even better with addtional amp. Also, you can add a small sub later even when you already have the RTi150's to acheive high level of bass volume without muddiness.