Mac Ads

polkatese
polkatese Posts: 6,767
edited May 2010 in Electronics
Cool stuff!
I am sorry, I have no opinion on the matter. I am sure you do. So, don't mind me, I just want to talk audio and pie.
Post edited by polkatese on

Comments

  • chargerman426
    chargerman426 Posts: 419
    edited May 2010
    Dam Got me all excited about seeing a Mac computer for no reason. :)
    If life had more tubes it would be a lot smoother.
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited May 2010
    Sean? :D
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • Litz
    Litz Posts: 111
    edited May 2010
    Never met a Macintosh speaker that I liked.
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,985
    edited May 2010
    Me neither, the back end gear is where it's at McIntosh. Stick to what you know.

    Why is the dude naked? (or worse yet, why do I assume he is) I find that one disturbing, made me think of Micah for some reason, but not a sock to be found.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • Litz
    Litz Posts: 111
    edited May 2010
    RuSsMaN wrote: »
    Why is the dude naked?
    Cheers,
    Russ

    It's a failed concept cover photo for an early Rush album...
  • Hawkeye
    Hawkeye Posts: 1,313
    edited May 2010
    Litz wrote: »
    Never met a Macintosh speaker that I liked.

    Have to agree with you on this. Even though I'm a die-hard McIntosh guy, their speakers seem flat and lifeless to me, even the TOL left me wanting, for everything!

    Gordon
    2 Channel -
    Martin Logan Spire, 2 JL Audio F112 subs
    McIntosh C1000 Controller with Tube pre amp, 2 MC501 amplifiers, MD1K Transport & DAC, MR-88 Tuner
    WireWorld Eclipse 6.0 speaker wire and jumpers, Eclipse 5^2 Squared Balanced IC's. Silver Eclipse PCs (5)
    Symposium Rollerblocks 2+ (16)Black Diamond Racing Mk 3 pits (8)
  • Litz
    Litz Posts: 111
    edited May 2010
    Hawkeye wrote: »
    Have to agree with you on this. Even though I'm a die-hard McIntosh guy, their speakers seem flat and lifeless to me, even the TOL left me wanting, for everything!

    Gordon

    I went to House of music in San Fran area---the largest mac dealer on earth. I listened to everything...didn't like any of the speakers. Lifeless was it. I did at the time, have a very nice mac amp and pre. Those were quite nice.
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited May 2010
    RuSsMaN wrote: »
    Me neither, the back end gear is where it's at McIntosh. Stick to what you know.

    Why is the dude naked? (or worse yet, why do I assume he is) I find that one disturbing, made me think of Micah for some reason, but not a sock to be found.

    Cheers,
    Russ


    I was wondering the same thing..but I don't want to go all Freudian and start talking about the speakers as Phallic symbols....etc.--and what's with the TATOO?

    What the hoo.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_Phallic_Building_contest Maybe this inspired the ad??

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • Litz
    Litz Posts: 111
    edited May 2010
    now it makes sense...
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,561
    edited May 2010
    RuSsMaN wrote: »

    Why is the dude naked? (or worse yet, why do I assume he is) I find that one disturbing.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Ditto , Now a Naked chic I'm all in. Nice gear anyway.
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • mantis
    mantis Posts: 17,561
    edited May 2010
    mantis wrote: »
    Ditto , Now a Naked chic I'm all in. Nice gear anyway.

    I meant the McIntosh not the dude LOL
    Dan
    My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time.
  • Bernal
    Bernal Posts: 991
    edited May 2010
    litz wrote: »
    it's a failed concept cover photo for an early rush album...

    +1..