Sound And The Story (1956)

Motzart
Motzart Posts: 1,075
edited March 2010 in 2 Channel Audio
I found this on another forum and it's wicked kewl!
Just had to share with you old stereophiles out there. :D

Old Movie on how RCA 'In Living Stereo' Vinyl records were made!

Sound And The Story (1956)
http://www.archive.org/details/SoundAndTheS

IF I have posted this in the wrong place moderator my apologies.
Wasn't sure where to place it?


.

Yamaha RX-A710 90Watt 7.1
Mains: RTi A1's Center: CS150 Sats: RT15i's Sub: Velodyne DPS-10
Music CD: Sony CDP-CE375 5 Disk
HD TV: Vizio 42" LCD 1080p E420VO
Blu-Ray: Sony BDP-S350
DVD: Sony DVP-NC665P 5 Disk
AV Rack: Sanus Euro EFAB-II Audio Base x2 EFAS-II Audio Expansion Shelf x4
Cables Used: Monster Cable HPD Sony HDMI DLCHE18W
Phones: Sennheiser HD280 Pro
Post edited by Motzart on

Comments

  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited March 2010
    I've got a bunch of the RCA Living Stereo LP's....LOVE 'em. Those and the old Mercury Living Presence....

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited March 2010
    That is an excellent movie. Thanks for sharing.
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • TNRabbit
    TNRabbit Posts: 2,168
    edited March 2010
    I have a Ravel SACD made from one of the "living stereo" recordings...cool link!
    TNRabbit
    NO Polk Audio Equipment :eek:
    Sunfire TG-IV
    Ashly 1001 Active Crossover
    Rane PEQ-15 Parametric Equalizers x 2
    Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature Seven
    Carver AL-III Speakers
    Klipsch RT-12d Subwoofer
  • engtaz
    engtaz Posts: 7,663
    edited March 2010
    Thanks for the link.
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.
  • Motzart
    Motzart Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2010
    Thanx!
    I thought it was way cool!
    Don't see full length vids from back then very often.
    Especially one that shares a common interest like Records/Music! :D

    Yamaha RX-A710 90Watt 7.1
    Mains: RTi A1's Center: CS150 Sats: RT15i's Sub: Velodyne DPS-10
    Music CD: Sony CDP-CE375 5 Disk
    HD TV: Vizio 42" LCD 1080p E420VO
    Blu-Ray: Sony BDP-S350
    DVD: Sony DVP-NC665P 5 Disk
    AV Rack: Sanus Euro EFAB-II Audio Base x2 EFAS-II Audio Expansion Shelf x4
    Cables Used: Monster Cable HPD Sony HDMI DLCHE18W
    Phones: Sennheiser HD280 Pro
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,411
    edited March 2010
    man that brought back some memories.

    My Dad worked for CBS records for 38 some years, I did for 5 years, my wife and sister did for around 12. Amazing how the mfg process advanced so little from this 56 film to what I saw in late 80s early 90s.
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • Motzart
    Motzart Posts: 1,075
    edited March 2010
    With records making a comeback.....probably fully automated now?

    Yamaha RX-A710 90Watt 7.1
    Mains: RTi A1's Center: CS150 Sats: RT15i's Sub: Velodyne DPS-10
    Music CD: Sony CDP-CE375 5 Disk
    HD TV: Vizio 42" LCD 1080p E420VO
    Blu-Ray: Sony BDP-S350
    DVD: Sony DVP-NC665P 5 Disk
    AV Rack: Sanus Euro EFAB-II Audio Base x2 EFAS-II Audio Expansion Shelf x4
    Cables Used: Monster Cable HPD Sony HDMI DLCHE18W
    Phones: Sennheiser HD280 Pro
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited March 2010
    Excellent, thank you!
  • adam2434
    adam2434 Posts: 995
    edited March 2010
    Neat! Thanks!

    Makes you appreciate the skill and care that went into making good recordings of the time, on what many may view as primitive equipment.

    The conductor smoking in the sound room - classic for that era!
    5.1 and 2.0 ch Basement Media Room: Outlaw 975/Emotiva DC-1/Rotel RB-1582 MKII/Rotel RB-1552/Audiosource Amp 3/Polk LS90, CS400i, FX500i/Outlaw X-12, LFM-1/JVD DLA-HD250/Da-Lite 100" HCCV/Sony ES BDP/Sonos Connect. DC-1/RB-1582 MKII/Sonos Connect also feed Polk 7C in garage or Dayton IO655 on patio.
    2.1 ch Basement Gym: Denon AVR-2807/Klipsch Forte I or NHT SB2/JBL SUB 550P x 2/Chromecast Audio.
    2.0 ch Living Room: Rotel RX-1052/Emotiva DC-1/Klipsch RF-7 III/Sony ES BDP/LG 65" LED.
    2.0 ch Semi-portable: Klipsch Powergate/NHT SB3/Chromecast Audio.
    Kitchen: Sonos Play5.
  • Huck344
    Huck344 Posts: 453
    edited March 2010
    That was really cool. I never knew how they made records. Thanks for posting this link.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited March 2010
    Hello,
    The man sitting at the table beside the recording engineer is Jack Pfeiffer, a well know record producer for RCA. He's responsible for the superb Living Stereo series. Notice the six channel mixer is only using three mic channels for right and left. That complete orchestra was recorded with three widely spaced omnidirectional microphones. The secret is knowing where to place them for best results. No gain riding, once the levels were set they were left alone. Today they use four mics on the drums alone. If you don't have a 24 track studio nobody's going to use you. Those tape recorders are Ampex two complete setups in case one of the decks had problems. Anybody know what the mics are?
    I wish I had a shopping cart and 30 minutes alone in that vault room.
    Cheers, Ken
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,338
    edited March 2010
    Anybody know what the mics are?
    QUOTE]

    Telefunken or Electrovoice, ribbon mikes
    Carl

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited March 2010
    Hello,
    I'm still working on trying to nail down the specific microphones being used. At the time RCA was partial to Neumann U-47 and M-49 and M-50 but they don't appear to be any of those.
    However, I have made some progress in the speakers being used as monitors. Those were RCA LC-1A speakers designed by Harry Olson and the cabinet type shown in the movie were called the "furnace" style. They were a two way design using a 15" woofer. Evidently the speakers were sold commercially with various wood cabinets. They were described as a bit "loose" in the bass (might be why they had them on stools to even out the bass response) but clear and detailed sounding in the mid range and treble.
    After looking at the clip a few more times I believe it was being done with just two microphones. The tape recorder seems to be an Ampex 300 with Ampex 350 record electronics, vacuum tubes.
    Thanks for the microphone suggestions, I'll keep digging. Let me explain why this is so interesting to me, if I might. Whenever I listen to a recording, no matter if it's coming off a record or a tape (or CD or SACD) I play a little mental game, with myself, to enrich the experience. I try and imagine the entire process, from the musicians showing up at the recording venue to the final product that ends up in my hands. All of the steps along the way are important. The more detailed information I can have the better I can imagine what I'm hearing. The next time you begin listening to something, look at the information that comes with it. Sort out the number of musicians, think about what went on during the recording. Were they a working group or a pickup band? Did everybody know each other and there was lots of chatting before the recording began? If you can begin building up a mental picture of the event then, I find anyway, that the final listening becomes more involved and stronger. If you practice this a little bit you can start to see, in your mind's eye, an actual musical event. The better the recording and the more information the record's packaging tells you the stronger an impression of the actual event will become.
    That's why that video clip is so cool, you can actually begin to reconstruct events and get inside the process from the images captured by the camera.
    Enjoy, Ken
  • AudioGenics
    AudioGenics Posts: 2,567
    edited March 2010
    We (my Dad also RCA Sarnoff engineer) had a Ampex half track and all tube electronics.
    Still have the microphone preamplifier again tubes.
    the electronics were hand wired.
    don't remember any circuit boards
    I'll have to get a picture next time I am visiting.
    Used Electro-voice microphones.... had to be absolutely silent
    sound proof otherwise it would be picked up in the recording
    there forever.
  • SCompRacer
    SCompRacer Posts: 8,500
    edited March 2010
    Ken, don't they look like RCA KU-3A's?

    http://www.coutant.org/ku3a/index.html
    Salk SoundScape 8's * Audio Research Reference 3 * Bottlehead Eros Phono * Park's Audio Budgie SUT * Krell KSA-250 * Harmonic Technology Pro 9+ * Signature Series Sonore Music Server w/Deux PS * Roon * Gustard R26 DAC / Singxer SU-6 DDC * Heavy Plinth Lenco L75 Idler Drive * AA MG-1 Linear Air Bearing Arm * AT33PTG/II & Denon 103R * Richard Gray 600S * NHT B-12d subs * GIK Acoustic Treatments * Sennheiser HD650 *
  • SCompRacer
    SCompRacer Posts: 8,500
    edited March 2010
    ....
    Salk SoundScape 8's * Audio Research Reference 3 * Bottlehead Eros Phono * Park's Audio Budgie SUT * Krell KSA-250 * Harmonic Technology Pro 9+ * Signature Series Sonore Music Server w/Deux PS * Roon * Gustard R26 DAC / Singxer SU-6 DDC * Heavy Plinth Lenco L75 Idler Drive * AA MG-1 Linear Air Bearing Arm * AT33PTG/II & Denon 103R * Richard Gray 600S * NHT B-12d subs * GIK Acoustic Treatments * Sennheiser HD650 *
  • mmadden28
    mmadden28 Posts: 4,283
    edited March 2010
    I like--Thanks
    ____________________
    This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

    HT:Onkyo 805, Emotiva XPA-5, Mitsu 52" 1080p DLP / polkaudio RTi12, CSIa6, FXi3, uPro4K
    2-chnl : Pio DV-46AV (SACD), Dodd ELP, Emotiva XPA-1s, XPA-2, Odyssey Khartago, LSi9, SDA-SRS 2 :cool:, SB Duet, MSB & Monarchy DACs, Yamaha PX3 TT, SAE Tuner...
    Pool: Atrium 60's/45's
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited March 2010
    Thanks, Scomp!
    Those are single direction microphones, not omnidirectional that means less rear hall ambient information will be recorded. So, those early recordings will have a more dry sound, less reverberant quality.
    Something I just thought of. Since the mics are very widely spaced there sound be quite a bit of opposite channel information exchanged between the two mics. This would contribute to good SDA effects. The SDA technology is revealing what is different between the right and left channel. The sounds picked up by the left microphone not only are the sounds of the left side of the orchestra but the slightly delayed sounds produced by the right side of the orchestra. The same happens to the right microphone, it gets the right hand part of the grouping plus a delayed sub-layer of left side information. If the mics were closer together the delay time between direct and distance information becomes less and the result would be a dilution of the SDA information.
    SDA owners listening to this recording could remove the negative speaker connections form both right and left channels and hear what just the SDA part of the signal sounds like. Interesting.
    Enjoy, Ken
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited March 2010
    Hello,
    Some further digging. From what I gather this particular recording was not issued as a Living Stereo vinyl record. It was issued as an "LM" series monophonic record (in fact that's what the lady is listening to in the beginning) and a stereo two track tape. The later 1961 version, Munch made, was issued as a Living Stereo vinyl record but not the earlier 1956 recording. I've just ordered the CD made from the stereo master tape of the earlier recording (most reviewers prefer the earlier recording's sound). Anyone interested in forming a listening exchange? I'd be happy to send the CD on to another person who, in turn, sends it on to another listener.
    Cheers, Ken