LSi15 or LSi9

engage
engage Posts: 10
edited January 2010 in Speakers
I plan to update my sound system starting with the mains (I have RT1000i mains now). I am going to listen to LSi15s over the weekend, but since I also plan to get a Rythmik powered sub, some claim that I should go with the LSi9s since the LSi15 woofers would be redundant.

Opinions?
Post edited by engage on

Comments

  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited January 2010
    I'm probably with "some." ;)
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • Menasor
    Menasor Posts: 283
    edited January 2010
    Rhythmik sub = go with LSi 9 :)

    Fronts: Energy RC-70
    Center: Energy RC-LCR
    Surrounds: Energy Veritas 1.0CM
    Subwoofer: SVS PC12-NSD
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR705
    Amplifier: Denon POA-2200 w/ Ben's ICs


    Pics of my setup (click me)
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    Thanks for the replies.

    The comment that has been made to me is that the LSi9s are the top half of a LSi15. Physically, this makes sense, but the cross-over frequencies are different. On the LSi15s, the woofer takes everything below 150 Hz, whereas, with the LSi9s, I might cross them at 80 Hz. SO technically, the LSi9s would have less head-room.

    I'm far from an expert, I just know what I like soundwise. Would driving the LSi9s down farther have negative consequences?
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited January 2010
    Farther down than.... 80hz?

    For music i'd probably end up between 60hz and 80hz on those speakers, depending on the sub of course.
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • Menasor
    Menasor Posts: 283
    edited January 2010
    engage wrote: »
    Thanks for the replies.

    The comment that has been made to me is that the LSi9s are the top half of a LSi15. Physically, this makes sense, but the cross-over frequencies are different. On the LSi15s, the woofer takes everything below 150 Hz, whereas, with the LSi9s, I might cross them at 80 Hz. SO technically, the LSi9s would have less head-room.

    I'm far from an expert, I just know what I like soundwise. Would driving the LSi9s down farther have negative consequences?

    The larger speaker will always have more headroom. The LSi15 will probably have more midbass punch than the LSi9's due to that crossover. However, it's up to you to decide whether or not that's worth the additional cost. :)

    Fronts: Energy RC-70
    Center: Energy RC-LCR
    Surrounds: Energy Veritas 1.0CM
    Subwoofer: SVS PC12-NSD
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR705
    Amplifier: Denon POA-2200 w/ Ben's ICs


    Pics of my setup (click me)
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,235
    edited January 2010
    I own both and didn't notice any advantage of the 15's over the 9's when paired with my SVS sub. I now run my 9's in my HT with the SVS and the 15's in my living room with no sub.
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    thanks for all the replies.

    From the responses it looks like it is more of a price issue, i.e., the LSi9s are nearly half the cost with little compromise when paired with a good sub. Given that the LSi15s I am looking at are 2-years old, in brand-new condition, and less than the cost of a Polk ebay store set of LSi9s with stands, I'll give the LSi15s a shot.
  • MANSKITO
    MANSKITO Posts: 295
    edited January 2010
    while I have not heard the LSI speakers for then like 10mins. Consider this.

    When I had monitor 40s as my mains I heard a disconnect between them and my sub.

    When i changed them out for monitor 60s the disconnect closed considerably.

    While my gear is much lower on the food chain then yours the basic idea of that larger woofer surface area with larger cabniet volume improves bass response holds true. If you want the smoothest system the LIS 15s are a better pick IMO then the Lsi 9.

    Trying to match ANY book shelf speaker that i have heard with a sub is much MUCH harder then doing it with a tower speaker. (that are in the same price class)

    The woofers would be any thing but redundant IMO because they help bridge disconnect between the mains and the sub that you are likely to run into no matter how much your gear coast.

    From my limited experience hearing a sub is bad, hearing bass is awesome.

    Yes the LSI 9s are cheaper, kick **** and will sound great! But will they sound just as good as Lis15s, no they won't Polk dose not make a Redundant woofer lol.
    Monitor 60s, CS10 front
    Monitor 40s, back
    PSW10:(

    H/k AVR 325
    Sansui Tape Deck
    Pioneer PD-5010 CD player

    Sennheiser HD 650s :D
    Maverick Audio Tube Magic D1 DAC

    AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.8 prime stabel
    4 gigs 1066, cas 5
    XFX 4890 1gig
    Seagate 1tb 7200.12
    Creative X-fI Titanium Fatal1ty
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,235
    edited January 2010
    engage wrote: »
    Given that the LSi15s I am looking at are 2-years old, in brand-new condition, and less than the cost of a Polk ebay store set of LSi9s with stands, I'll give the LSi15s a shot.

    Me thinks this make it a no-brainer:D
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    Thanks for all the input:)

    Last question. I don't want to purchase the LSiC yet (I've spent a lot of money upgrading my HT over the last few months :(). I have a CSi40 now and can get a CSi5 with the LSi15s.

    Would one be a better match in the mean time? (I'll likely take the CSi5 so that I have a center to sell with my RT1000i's)
  • Menasor
    Menasor Posts: 283
    edited January 2010
    engage wrote: »
    Thanks for all the input:)

    Last question. I don't want to purchase the LSiC yet (I've spent a lot of money upgrading my HT over the last few months :(). I have a CSi40 now and can get a CSi5 with the LSi15s.

    Would one be a better match in the mean time? (I'll likely take the CSi5 so that I have a center to sell with my RT1000i's)

    Just run a phantom center until you can afford the LSiC. Sell the CSi40 you have with the RT1000i's.

    Fronts: Energy RC-70
    Center: Energy RC-LCR
    Surrounds: Energy Veritas 1.0CM
    Subwoofer: SVS PC12-NSD
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR705
    Amplifier: Denon POA-2200 w/ Ben's ICs


    Pics of my setup (click me)
  • MANSKITO
    MANSKITO Posts: 295
    edited January 2010
    PSOVLSK wrote: »
    Me thinks this make it a no-brainer:D

    wps I tend to not read every single post lawl sorry for the waste of time.
    Monitor 60s, CS10 front
    Monitor 40s, back
    PSW10:(

    H/k AVR 325
    Sansui Tape Deck
    Pioneer PD-5010 CD player

    Sennheiser HD 650s :D
    Maverick Audio Tube Magic D1 DAC

    AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.8 prime stabel
    4 gigs 1066, cas 5
    XFX 4890 1gig
    Seagate 1tb 7200.12
    Creative X-fI Titanium Fatal1ty
  • curved
    curved Posts: 664
    edited January 2010
    Menasor wrote: »
    Just run a phantom center until you can afford the LSiC. Sell the CSi40 you have with the RT1000i's.

    I'm not a big fan of the phantom setup, but I agree with this statement. The RTi/CSi setup is a lot different sounding than the LSi setup.
    Living Room:....................[HTML] [/HTML] Zone 2 (Workout Room):
    AVR - Yamaha RX-V757......JBL 4312 Pro Monitors
    Pre - Nak CA-5
    AMP - Adcom 555 (Main)
    Main - Polk RTI8**/RTiA5
    AMP - Adcom 545II (Center)
    Center - Polk CSiA4**
    Sub - Snell Basis 300:p......Zone 3 (Outside)
    CD - Yamaha CDC-555.......Def Tech AW5500
    TV - Pani TH-42PZ80U
    BR - LG BD390
    Monster HTS1600 Power Center
    Dedicated Circuit - (2) 20amp, (1) 15amp
    Ben's IC, Canare 4S11

    **Dayton and Sonicap Caps with Mills Resistors**
  • Bean
    Bean Posts: 17
    edited January 2010
    curved wrote: »
    I'm not a big fan of the phantom setup, but I agree with this statement. The RTi/CSi setup is a lot different sounding than the LSi setup.

    Seconded.
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    Picked up the Lsi15s on Saturday and love them. The speaker is very clean thru the entire range, but I'm really surprised at how nice the mid-bass is (especially without an internal amp). In fact, I am not using my old Velodyne VA-1012 because it sounds so bad compared to these speakers. My Rythmik D15SE arrives tomorrow and hopefully will be a better match.

    I was able to drive the speaker just fine with my Onkyo TX-NR807, but I was listening to music, so I only was driving the two speakers. I hooked up my Outlaw monoblocks on Sunday for peace of mind.

    For those that own the Lsi15s, where have you set your sub woofer crossover?
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,235
    edited January 2010
    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89529

    You can thank me later:D

    Seriously though, when you get an extra $130, this is a nice, easy, inexpensive upgrade. The more it breaks in, the better it sounds.

    Can't help with the crossover question, my 15's are in a two-channel set-up.

    Enjoy the new speakers!
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • acmf74
    acmf74 Posts: 936
    edited January 2010
    I bought mine (LSi15) about 2 weeks ago. My wife who is not an audio enthusiast even admits they sound awesome....
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    PSOVLSK wrote: »
    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89529

    You can thank me later:D

    Seriously though, when you get an extra $130, this is a nice, easy, inexpensive upgrade. The more it breaks in, the better it sounds.

    Can't help with the crossover question, my 15's are in a two-channel set-up.

    Enjoy the new speakers!

    I don't think I'm ready to pull them apart yet, especially after dropping $1100 on the Rythmik sub.

    Rythmik's are suppose to be a very "musical" sub, so I'm hoping it will match well with the Lsi15s. Perhaps I'll start by crossing at 60 Hz and go from there.


    acmf74 - my LsiC is on the way as well. Gets here on Thursday.

    Rythmik tomorrow, LsiC on Thursday, it's like Christmas all over again :)
  • PSOVLSK
    PSOVLSK Posts: 5,235
    edited January 2010
    engage wrote: »
    I don't think I'm ready to pull them apart yet, especially after dropping $1100 on the Rythmik sub.

    I forgot about the Rythmik sub:o. Don't think upgrading the woofer would provide much benefit for you, would it?:rolleyes:
    Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out.-John Wooden
  • Cassidy
    Cassidy Posts: 87
    edited January 2010
    I have the LSi15's, LSiC, and LSi80's(in-ceiling surrounds) and it sounds pretty nice. Driven by an Onkyo 805 and an Emotiva xpa3.

    I'm about to jump into the sub world once my dual Rythmik 12's arrive. :D

    I'm not quite sure how the bass managment, Audessy, and the Rythmik seetings will all play together but I suspect I'll find out soon enough. I 'll report back once they arrive.
  • engage
    engage Posts: 10
    edited January 2010
    Cassidy wrote: »
    I have the LSi15's, LSiC, and LSi80's(in-ceiling surrounds) and it sounds pretty nice. Driven by an Onkyo 805 and an Emotiva xpa3.

    I'm about to jump into the sub world once my dual Rythmik 12's arrive. :D

    I'm not quite sure how the bass managment, Audessy, and the Rythmik seetings will all play together but I suspect I'll find out soon enough. I 'll report back once they arrive.

    I am in the process of integrating my D15SE. It's harder than I thought for a couple of reasons:

    1. The Lsi15s do a really nice job in the mid bass and go much lower than I thought.
    2. The Lsi15s put out enough bass to interfere with the Rythmik

    When I first connected the Rythmik, I thought the sound quality went down. The sub is nice, but something wasn't right. I then downloaded a test sweep 20Hz to 125Hz. I found out I had a significant drop at about 50Hz. When I unplugged the Lsi15s, the drop went away, so either the Lsi15s are interferring with each other and/or the sub. I raised the crossover on the Lsi's to 80Hz and used the PEQ on the Rythmik to boost the 50 Hz region and the sound is really nice. I still have significant peaks at 65-80 Hz where I think the Rythmik and Lsi's are additive.

    The point is that the Lsi15's are so nice, it makes integrating a sub that much harder. I continue to be amazed at just how clean the mid-bass on these speakers is. My son listened to them the other night and his jaw dropped.

    Also, when comparing the system with and without the Rythmik, I am jumping between stereo and Direct mode, so it is not apples-to-apples.

    I had run Audessey first, so I'm not sure why I had such a distinct 50Hz drop - it was a good 10 dB. Perhaps it was beyond where Audessey could compensate.

    Anyway, my next step is to run the sweeps with just the Lsi15's and see if the interaction is there. If so, I'll play with their postioning.