Are there differences in drivers of the same model # from different model speakers?

mmadden28
mmadden28 Posts: 4,283
edited January 2010 in Vintage Speakers
Using the MW6502 as an example, which is used in a variety of Monitor models such as the 4, 4.5, 5, 5jr, 7, etc. (but this could apply to any driver that's used in several models)

The label on the back of the driver shows a list of models it was "Engineered for use in" with little check boxes next to them, and the appropriate model may be marked in some way and usually a big red or black stamp of the model is also stamped on the label (such as 5B).

The image below is an MW-6502 apparently from a Monitor 4 as indicated by the stamped M4
attachment.php?attachmentid=45650&stc=1&d=1262935816

Is there a visible or design (either in the magnet, frame, voice coil, etc), difference between an MW6502 marked for a 5B, vs one marked for a 4 or 7, etc??
I suspect not, but then why differentiate on the label or mark it. It specifically says "Engineered for use in:" so one might presume that since there is a choice, that the design might be different. Kind of like a packaging box that shows two color options (Black or Cherry) with a check box next to each.
Only other reason I can think of is for warranty reasons such as to prevent switching out bad drivers from an out of warranty speaker to a speaker that's in warranty that has the same drivers.

I haven't had the chance yet, but there is a visible difference in the dust cap between a pair of Mon 5B and Mon 5A (or something like that) that I have. Also there IS a difference between the vintage MW6509 driver and the newer MW6509s currently being produced, most apparent is the doped paper cone and rubber surround are distinctively different, its stiffer (not as loose) and I've seen a subjective report of it not sounding the same (which could just require more break-in time) - But the visible difference is there none-the-less but the MN is the same.

I am mainly asking to be sure that if I buy a vintage driver to repair one of my speakers, do I need to concern myself with what model speaker it came from , or as long as the MW# is the same that I'll be good to go.
____________________
This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

HT:Onkyo 805, Emotiva XPA-5, Mitsu 52" 1080p DLP / polkaudio RTi12, CSIa6, FXi3, uPro4K
2-chnl : Pio DV-46AV (SACD), Dodd ELP, Emotiva XPA-1s, XPA-2, Odyssey Khartago, LSi9, SDA-SRS 2 :cool:, SB Duet, MSB & Monarchy DACs, Yamaha PX3 TT, SAE Tuner...
Pool: Atrium 60's/45's
Post edited by mmadden28 on

Comments

  • Tour2ma
    Tour2ma Posts: 10,177
    edited January 2010
    Your suspicion is correct, i.e., no difference.

    I suspect that the model list on the label was a production line tool, one that they did not apparently use in this case where they opted for the M4 stamp. It is/ was common to designate enough parts to complete a production run.
    More later,
    Tour...
    Vox Copuli
    Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb

    "Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner

    "It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
    "There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD