Power for RTiA9 speakers

ls7z06
ls7z06 Posts: 95
edited January 2010 in Speakers
I currently power my 3 front channels with an Emotiva XPA-3 200W per channel amp. Is that enough power to adequately drive the RTi A9 speakers?
Post edited by ls7z06 on

Comments

  • leroyjr1
    leroyjr1 Posts: 8,785
    edited November 2009
    Yes, 200 watts will run the a9's just fine. Did you pull the trigger yet?
  • superjunior
    superjunior Posts: 1,632
    edited November 2009
    works for me! sure there's much better amps out there but the xpa-3 drives the 9's just fine
    panasonic th-50pz85u
    pioneer elite vsx-92txh
    pioneer elite bdp-05fd
    emotiva xpa-3
    monster power hdp 2550
    sa 8300 hd dvr
    sda 2b's
    fronts - rti a9's
    center - csi a6
    surrounds - fxi a6's
    sub - polk dsw pro 600
    harmony one
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited November 2009
    Yes that amp is plenty. 200wpc is about enough to ensure that most speakers operate to their full potential. Enjoy.
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,094
    edited November 2009
    works for me! sure there's much better amps out there but the xpa-3 drives the 9's just fine

    You're doing just fine with the XPA-3. No need to spend more $$$ for the same result. Relax & enjoy!
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,476
    edited November 2009
    You're doing just fine with the XPA-3. No need to spend more $$$ for the same result. Relax & enjoy!

    All amps are NOT the same. I agree that the Emo in question is fine for the task at hand and there is no NEED to replace it, however to say that he will have the SAME result if he were to try another amp is simply not true.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • superjunior
    superjunior Posts: 1,632
    edited November 2009
    xcapri79 wrote: »
    This is true. There are worse amps out there, better amps out there, as well as, similar performing amps out there.
    Based on the relative costs and performance, the Emotiva amp and the RTiA9's are a good fit.

    I agree. I would love to get my hands on a nice krell, and one day I will. For now, the emo fits the budget and drives the a9's nicely
    panasonic th-50pz85u
    pioneer elite vsx-92txh
    pioneer elite bdp-05fd
    emotiva xpa-3
    monster power hdp 2550
    sa 8300 hd dvr
    sda 2b's
    fronts - rti a9's
    center - csi a6
    surrounds - fxi a6's
    sub - polk dsw pro 600
    harmony one
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,349
    edited November 2009
    I am running my RTiA9's with the XPA-3 the combo works just fine IMO.

    superjunior the day you can afford a high end Krell is the day I would look at something besides the RTiA9's to match it with. IMO the only thing you might gain with a higher end amp with the RTiA9's is maybe a little tighter bass response.

    The RTi series with the Emo amp XPA-3/-5, Pioneer receiver SC-05/07, Audioquest speaker wires and IC's make for a fantastic setup IMO. And for $2000 - $3000 depending on what models you choose it's money well spent for the guy that justs wants a nice system and don't care about this being a hobby. a setup within this range will keep the typical person very happy for years to come.
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • superjunior
    superjunior Posts: 1,632
    edited November 2009
    I am running my RTiA9's with the XPA-3 the combo works just fine IMO.

    superjunior the day you can afford a high end Krell is the day I would look at something besides the RTiA9's to match it with. IMO the only thing you might gain with a higher end amp with the RTiA9's is maybe a little tighter bass response.

    The RTi series with the Emo amp XPA-3/-5, Pioneer receiver SC-05/07, Audioquest speaker wires and IC's make for a fantastic setup IMO. And for $2000 - $3000 depending on what models you choose it's money well spent for the guy that justs wants a nice system and don't care about this being a hobby. a setup within this range will keep the typical person very happy for years to come.

    as usuall I couldn't agree with you more - I need to stay the hell away from krells website :p
    panasonic th-50pz85u
    pioneer elite vsx-92txh
    pioneer elite bdp-05fd
    emotiva xpa-3
    monster power hdp 2550
    sa 8300 hd dvr
    sda 2b's
    fronts - rti a9's
    center - csi a6
    surrounds - fxi a6's
    sub - polk dsw pro 600
    harmony one
  • Retro152
    Retro152 Posts: 985
    edited November 2009
    I am running my RTiA9's with the XPA-3 the combo works just fine IMO.

    superjunior the day you can afford a high end Krell is the day I would look at something besides the RTiA9's to match it with. IMO the only thing you might gain with a higher end amp with the RTiA9's is maybe a little tighter bass response.

    The RTi series with the Emo amp XPA-3/-5, Pioneer receiver SC-05/07, Audioquest speaker wires and IC's make for a fantastic setup IMO. And for $2000 - $3000 depending on what models you choose it's money well spent for the guy that justs wants a nice system and don't care about this being a hobby. a setup within this range will keep the typical person very happy for years to come.

    You nailed it here Larry, one of the best response's to a thread topic i have seen since joining the Forum. I enjoy all these same components in my setup with no complaints. Affordability, performance, it all works. Looking towards different gear in the future as funds allow, (As we all are:rolleyes:) but for now this does the job quite nicely. Again, well put.





    Pat.
    Receiver: Pioneer Elite SC-05
    Amp: Emotiva Xpa-3
    Front L/R: POLK Rti-a9s':D
    Center:POLK Csi-a6
    Rear surround's:POLK Rti-a1s'
    Sub: Klipsch Synergy sub-12
    Sony Kdl-46w4100 46" LCD
    PS3
    Audioquest type 4 wiring.
  • ls7z06
    ls7z06 Posts: 95
    edited November 2009
    OK. Thanks for the feedback. I am currently running RTiA7's. Just getting ready to do something here. Not sure what yet. I am thinking about swapping out the a7's with the a9's. Can get them from the Polk refurb store for about $900/pr.

    also have had some thoughts about dumping the whole RTi set up and replacing it all with 4 LSi9's and an LSi center. I already have 2 LSi9's, so I would just have to get one more set and a center.

    Here are my choices...
    a. Emo XPA-3 200w driving RTiA9 fronts and CSiA6 center. Onk TX-SR876 140W driving FXiA6 surrounds and FXiA4 rear surrounds.
    or.....
    b. Emo XPA-3 300w (4ohm) driving LSi9 fronts and LSi center. Emo UPA-2 185w driving LSi9 surrounds.

    either set up still has the SVS PB12-Plus sub, so I'm good on bass.

    Which set up is better A or B?
  • LessisNevermore
    LessisNevermore Posts: 1,519
    edited November 2009
    ls7z06 wrote: »
    OK. Thanks for the feedback. I am currently running RTiA7's. Just getting ready to do something here. Not sure what yet. I am thinking about swapping out the a7's with the a9's. Can get them from the Polk refurb store for about $900/pr.

    also have had some thoughts about dumping the whole RTi set up and replacing it all with 4 LSi9's and an LSi center. I already have 2 LSi9's, so I would just have to get one more set and a center.

    Here are my choices...
    a. Emo XPA-3 200w driving RTiA9 fronts and CSiA6 center. Onk TX-SR876 140W driving FXiA6 surrounds and FXiA4 rear surrounds.
    or.....
    b. Emo XPA-3 300w (4ohm) driving LSi9 fronts and LSi center. Emo UPA-2 185w driving LSi9 surrounds.

    either set up still has the SVS PB12-Plus sub, so I'm good on bass.

    Which set up is better A or B?

    Option B, if you intend on using your rig for music, it's not even close.
    I'd opt for LSi7's for the surrounds. IMO, they'd be a better match for the UPA-2, and I think 9's are a bit overkill for surround duty-nothing wrong with that choice, either.
  • leroyjr1
    leroyjr1 Posts: 8,785
    edited November 2009
    ls7z06 wrote: »
    OK. Thanks for the feedback. I am currently running RTiA7's. Just getting ready to do something here. Not sure what yet. I am thinking about swapping out the a7's with the a9's. Can get them from the Polk refurb store for about $900/pr.

    also have had some thoughts about dumping the whole RTi set up and replacing it all with 4 LSi9's and an LSi center. I already have 2 LSi9's, so I would just have to get one more set and a center.

    Here are my choices...
    a. Emo XPA-3 200w driving RTiA9 fronts and CSiA6 center. Onk TX-SR876 140W driving FXiA6 surrounds and FXiA4 rear surrounds.
    or.....
    b. Emo XPA-3 300w (4ohm) driving LSi9 fronts and LSi center. Emo UPA-2 185w driving LSi9 surrounds.

    either set up still has the SVS PB12-Plus sub, so I'm good on bass.

    Which set up is better A or B?

    Also add another $150 or so for shipping and taxes on the RTI a9's
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,094
    edited November 2009
    All amps are NOT the same. I agree that the Emo in question is fine for the task at hand and there is no NEED to replace it, however to say that he will have the SAME result if he were to try another amp is simply not true.

    Opinions vary.
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • CRESCENDOPOWER
    CRESCENDOPOWER Posts: 153
    edited November 2009
    Opinions vary.

    Yes, they do, but that still doesn't mean what nooshinjohn posted isn't 100% accurate.
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,476
    edited November 2009
    Opinions vary.

    Yes they do... I love my Sunfires, but my ultimate destination are a pair of 300wpc monobluck tube amps from either Mcintosh or Carver.;)
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
  • ls7z06
    ls7z06 Posts: 95
    edited November 2009
    xcapri79 wrote: »
    I prefer the LSi series for music, but get a pair of LSi15's or LSi25's up front.
    Use a second XPA-3 instead of the UPA-2 for the surrounds, or get a XPA2 for the fronts and use the XPA-3 for the center and side surrounds.

    Are the LSi9's the exact same thing as the LSi15's and 25's except without the subs?

    I do currently have a set of LSi9's that I use in a 2 channel stereo set up with an Emo UPA-2 and it does sound great.
  • sTiLlLeArNiNg
    sTiLlLeArNiNg Posts: 805
    edited November 2009
    RTiA 9's being powered by an xpa5 here and satisfied! They work quite well for HT & 2ch BUT i shure would like to add a pair of xpa1's for some more serious 2ch listening though :)

    Are the LSi's really that much better than RTiA's for music?
    Media Room 7.1
    Sharp lc37d64u | Sanus vmsab-03 | Sonax ZX8680 | Yamaha htr-6290b | Emotiva xpa1 x 2 & xpa5 | RTiA 9 & 7 | CSiA 6 | FXiA 6 | Sanus NF30B-03 | Velodyne dls-3750r | Dual 505-3 m97xe | Monster avs2000/hts5100

    HTPC
    Intel e5300 | Asus p5q DLX | LG ch08 BD | OCZ 4g reaper2 | WD 1TB | Sapphire 4890 VaporX 1g | Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3 | OCZ modXtreme 700w | Antec Fusion remote MAX

    A fool and his money are easily parted
    I don't drink Koolaid

    Need some cable's? Just ask :)
  • leroyjr1
    leroyjr1 Posts: 8,785
    edited November 2009
    Are the LSi's really that much better than RTiA's for music?

    Depends who you ask. The laid back tweeter is liked by many for music. I own both and for music I like the Vifa tweeter but think the RTI a's have a wider sound stage.
  • quadzilla
    quadzilla Posts: 1,543
    edited November 2009
    I'm running RTi12s, basically the old rev of the A9, and while they sounded good at 300 wpc, they sound much better at 850 wpc. Not volume, but the dynamics are vastly improved, and the speaker sounds much more open.
    Turntable: Empire 208
    Arm: Rega 300
    Cart: Shelter 501 III
    Phono Pre: dsachs consulting
    Digital: Marantz SACD 30n
    Pre: Conrad Johnson ET3 SE
    Amp: Conrad Johnson Premier 350
    Cables: Cardas Neutral Reference
    Speakers: SDA 2.3TL, heavily modified
  • selkec
    selkec Posts: 187
    edited January 2010
    quadzilla wrote: »
    I'm running RTi12s, basically the old rev of the A9, and while they sounded good at 300 wpc, they sound much better at 850 wpc. Not volume, but the dynamics are vastly improved, and the speaker sounds much more open.

    What are you using to get 850 watts per channel? Thats awesome. I have the a9's and also rti150's which were the old rev of the rti12's. You have sparked my curiousity. Could you pm me with what your getting all this power from. If you dont pm me I may never see your response. Thank in advance.
    Chris
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,815
    edited January 2010
    selkec wrote: »
    What are you using to get 850 watts per channel? Thats awesome.

    He's using pro amps, it's right in his signature...
    Center: Polk CSi 5 bi-amped with Mackie FR800
    Mains: Polk RTi 12 bi-amped with 2 Mackie FR1400s
    Surrounds: Polk F/Xi 3 powered by Mackie FR1400
    Rear: Polk RTi 70 powered by AVR

    I remember a time when I thought watts per channel meant a lot. The truth is they don't mean squat when it comes to quality sound.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk