Matching surrounds for RTi-A9s
Squishy Tia
Posts: 79
Yewwo
I'm trying to determine whether or not the TSi200s will match up to my A9s and a CSiA6 decently. I listened to the F/X series and was duly unimpressed with them as surrounds. Maybe as presence speakers, but definitely not surrounds.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
I'm trying to determine whether or not the TSi200s will match up to my A9s and a CSiA6 decently. I listened to the F/X series and was duly unimpressed with them as surrounds. Maybe as presence speakers, but definitely not surrounds.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Post edited by Squishy Tia on
Comments
-
RTI a3's would do a great job.
-
Also can't go wrong with the FXi A6's.
emotiva xpa-2
emotiva xpa-3
Denon 3312ci
Rtia9 /csia6 / FXi A6
Samsung LN46A650
SVS PB-12-NSD sub
Audio Research SP-9 MKIII (GNSC mods)
W4S ST250
Lsi 9 (mods)
W4S DAC-2
Mac Mini
Audio Aero Prima CD player
Pro-Ject debut -
But were the FXi's you listened to properly calibrated? Were they level matched to the rest of the speakers?
What was it about them that you didn't like?____________________
This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.
HT:Onkyo 805, Emotiva XPA-5, Mitsu 52" 1080p DLP / polkaudio RTi12, CSIa6, FXi3, uPro4K
2-chnl : Pio DV-46AV (SACD), Dodd ELP, Emotiva XPA-1s, XPA-2, Odyssey Khartago, LSi9, SDA-SRS 2 :cool:, SB Duet, MSB & Monarchy DACs, Yamaha PX3 TT, SAE Tuner...
Pool: Atrium 60's/45's -
But were the FXi's you listened to properly calibrated? Were they level matched to the rest of the speakers?
What was it about them that you didn't like?
I had trouble localizing them sonically. I know speakers are supposed to blend in with each other, but it just felt too "spacey" too me. I've noticed this with a lot of bipolar speakers actually. -
FXi's operate in either di-pole or bi-pole modes. The one's you listened to may have been in Bi-pole mode.
In Bi-pole mode, the surround effects will be diffuse and difficult to localize.
In Di-pole mode they will be more direct.____________________
This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.
HT:Onkyo 805, Emotiva XPA-5, Mitsu 52" 1080p DLP / polkaudio RTi12, CSIa6, FXi3, uPro4K
2-chnl : Pio DV-46AV (SACD), Dodd ELP, Emotiva XPA-1s, XPA-2, Odyssey Khartago, LSi9, SDA-SRS 2 :cool:, SB Duet, MSB & Monarchy DACs, Yamaha PX3 TT, SAE Tuner...
Pool: Atrium 60's/45's -
Not to derail the thread...
But is there any kind of a purpose to running FXi's if you're running them in dipole? Would running FXiA6's in dipole mode be any different from running a pair of RTiA3's?
I'm running RTi6's(old version of RTiA3) as surrounds with my RTi8's up front. They do a fantastic job.The nirvana inducer-
APC H10 Power Conditioner
Marantz UD5005 universal player
Parasound Halo P5 preamp
Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's -
comfortablycurt wrote: »Not to derail the thread...
But is there any kind of a purpose to running FXi's if you're running them in dipole? Would running FXiA6's in dipole mode be any different from running a pair of RTiA3's?
I'm running RTi6's(old version of RTiA3) as surrounds with my RTi8's up front. They do a fantastic job.
when running the a6's in dipole there is still sound coming from the other tweeter, which in my case directly faces the bar area - perfect speekers for my setup. have them set to large and they sound amazing from anywhere in the roompanasonic th-50pz85u
pioneer elite vsx-92txh
pioneer elite bdp-05fd
emotiva xpa-3
monster power hdp 2550
sa 8300 hd dvr
sda 2b's
fronts - rti a9's
center - csi a6
surrounds - fxi a6's
sub - polk dsw pro 600
harmony one -
Linn AV5140 fronts
Linn AV5120 Center
Linn AV5140 Rears
M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
Odyssey Mono-Blocs
SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D -
If that's the case, then what is even the difference between bipole and dipole modes?The nirvana inducer-
APC H10 Power Conditioner
Marantz UD5005 universal player
Parasound Halo P5 preamp
Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's -
comfortablycurt wrote: »If that's the case, then what is even the difference between bipole and dipole modes?
I've only had the fxi's a few days but from what I've heard so far, dipole mode blends the sound a bit more equally to both sides of the speeker as where bipole the sound is directed more the the driver side. either way there is still sound coming from both sides of the speeker.panasonic th-50pz85u
pioneer elite vsx-92txh
pioneer elite bdp-05fd
emotiva xpa-3
monster power hdp 2550
sa 8300 hd dvr
sda 2b's
fronts - rti a9's
center - csi a6
surrounds - fxi a6's
sub - polk dsw pro 600
harmony one -
Would RTi A3's sounds 'better' than Monitor 60's with the same setup? (9's and a CSi A6)