m-70 vs tsi300

luislane
luislane Posts: 6
edited November 2009 in Speakers
Hola; for the same price wich is the bether speaker
Post edited by luislane on

Comments

  • max mike
    max mike Posts: 8
    edited November 2009
    Monitor 70 no question about it.
  • coolsax
    coolsax Posts: 1,826
    edited November 2009
    +1 to the 70s
    Main 2ch -
    BlueSound Node->Ethereal optical cable->Peachtree Audio Nova 150->GoldenEar Triton 2+
    TT - Pro-ject Classic SB with Sumiko Bluepoint.

    TV 3.1 system -
    Denon 3500 -> Dynaudio Excite 32/22
  • kp1706
    kp1706 Posts: 37
    edited November 2009
    M70's without a doubt are better!
    KP

    Receiver: HK 354
    Amp: Adcom GFA 555
    Front: Polk Monitor 70
    Center: CS2
    Sub: PSW 125
    Surrounds: Old Yammi's
    CDP/DVDP: Sony DVP-NC600
    Blue Ray: Samsung BD-D5700
    TV: Sony 50" SXRD
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited November 2009
    WELCOME to Club Polk!

    +1 on M70s from an owner of both..The Tsi-300 are nice speakers for the price (retail) and they are worth that price...but they cannot handle the same amount of sound that the larger M70s can put out...for the record the TSI-400s can't either...

    The TSi-500s are the 'real' successor the the M-series flagship 70s

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • MrGlobe
    MrGlobe Posts: 401
    edited November 2009
    70s yo, they were a big improvement over the 60s and the 60s are similar to the 400s
  • luislane
    luislane Posts: 6
    edited November 2009
    thx
    2all going with the m70
  • packetjones
    packetjones Posts: 1,059
    edited November 2009
    that is good choice. you will not regret it. Let us know what you think once you get them hooked up.
    Front - RTiA5's
    Rear - RTiA3's
    Center - CSiA4
    Sub - PSW110