Do i need more power?

packetjones

Hello all, I am looking to get some new towers and am curious if my HK254 will be enough for them. It is rated at 50w per channel but I have heard that HK's are known to rate power differently. I have my planned set up below and was curious if i would have any issues. Thanks for any info.

HK 254
pair of RTi A5's
pair of RTi A3's
CSi A4
PSW 110

FittyFieFo

IMO: I would definitely look at an external amp. I don't know much, but 50watts per channel on those speakers that you have listed is very little power. Your receiver has pre-puts, I would look into some 3/5 channel amps.

cfrizz

Welcome to Club Polk Packet.

All speakers benefit from more power. Your HK has preamp outputs so that if you decide that you do want more power, you will just have to buy a separate amplifier to attach to the receiver.

Knucklehead

yeah like cfrizz' Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp.....thats a beast!

packetjones

i know that they would sound better with more power, but i am curious if my HK will be able to power them on its own. This is my first 5.1 HT and can not afford to get an amp at this time.

Should i not get the A5's? I know that with any of the other larger towers I would have issues but thought that the smaller A5's would be ok with my current AVR and the power it puts out.

nguyendot

Those are 50 real watts though, not "50" watts from cheap receivers.
For most people that would be enough, but if you want the best from your speakers I would give them much more power, like the sunfire that was recommended prior.^^

Knucklehead

sure it will, just not very efficently, just be careful to not start clipping them.

apphd

I am going to buck the trend a little. That HK's 50w per ch will do a decent job at driving those speakers, which is not a difficult load at all. As others have said just about all speakers benefit from more power, specifically gobs of reserve power available for instantaneous short term peaks. As long as you are in an average size room with average listening levels, you will probably be happy.

As others have pointed out your HK has pre outs, so if you feel like you want more power, that option remains open to you but does not need to be rushed into.

Kex

packetjones wrote: »

Hello all, I am looking to get some new towers and am curious if my HK254 will be enough for them. It is rated at 50w per channel but I have heard that HK's are known to rate power differently. I have my planned set up below and was curious if i would have any issues. Thanks for any info.

HK 254
pair of RTi A5's
pair of RTi A3's
CSi A4
PSW 110

One of my first real HT systems (with surround sound) used a h/k 147, rated at just 40w/ch, and speakers very similar to yours (older RT800 and RT55 and a CS245i).

Several remarks come to mind. Firstly, as a starter HT, it was absolutely outstanding IMO. Of course, there is better, but it completely exceeded all of my expectations for as long as I used it.

Secondly, those speakers are very efficient. Reference level is 85dB(A), and from reading discussions here, many people do not listen that loud (but I do, usually). Since the RTi A5, your mains speakers, are rated at 90dB, that means that, listening at 1m (about 3'), it would require one single watt to play at 90dB. As you move further away, the power requirements quickly increase dramatically, but in your case, you are unlikely to need more than 30w/ch to play as loud as you will ever need in a normal room. IMO, the only argument to be made for adding external amplification in the setup you describe, is for the ability to handle peaks with more authority (loud passages). In any case, even then I would recommend borrowing an amplifier first, and then making your purchase decisions based on the perceived improvement ... or lack thereof.

Thirdly, harman/kardon do rate their receivers all channels driven, and very conservatively. In the case of the 147 I was using, it was actually tested to output almost 70w, compared to the 40w published in the specifications. This is rarely true of most brands. While some very expensive receivers claiming to deliver 140w/ch have been similarly tested to actually deliver less than 50w/ch, there is every indication that the AVR 254 will output at least as much power as stated.

Finally, every system is a compromise according to personal priorities. Were you to spend extra money now on improvements, I would suggest the following priorities as providing the best return on your investment:
- Bigger center channel: the CSi A6.
- Better subwoofer, able to play lower than 30Hz.

Your subwoofer is currently the weakest link, IMO, but there are only a few subwoofers worth considering in the $200-499 range. Fixing the center channel would be a much easier decision, and you should seriously consider it IMO. The bigger Polk center channels really are wonderful to have.

Oh! Welcome to Club Polk BTW!

renowilliams

As you can see from my signature,I have a very similar speaker set up with A5 as my fronts and RTI6's (older version of the RTIA3's) for my rears. I am driving them with a powerful avr and they sound great. You won't be able to drive them like I am but you will be able to drive them with your avr. That said, I am going to purchase a power amp in the future and use my avr as a pre-pro. If you were to listen to my current set I think you would be pleased at what you hear. But were always looking to get more out of what we have. Take the advice of others in here and put more power to those speakers, you won't be dissappointed in the results.


Tim

bevo

I also have the A5's and a csi A4 and was wondering about adding more power. My receiver putts out 90 watts to 7 channels and doesn't have pre outs. For me to get more power to them would cost around 1000$. Will the difference in sound be worth 1000$? or should I upgrade my surrounds to the fxi line instead.

TouchOfEvil

I ran my RTi A5's off a HK unit for a good while. It ran with zero problems and sounded really nice.
I later added an amp and the biggest jump in output was the noticeable bass increase. Highs got a little more tame but in the end the HK did a decent job on it's own.
Will a amp help them later on certainly but if your budget is tight i wouldn't worry about it too much for the time being.

packetjones

I appreciate all the additional responses. The first few responses made it sound like i would have to have an amp to enjoy the new speakers. I knwo that teh sub that i have is not the best but i got it opn the cheap $100. I work at best buy so i can get a good deal on all of these speakers.


Does anyone have any good recommnedations on budget amps if i find that i need one. I am thinking that a 2 or 3 channel amp should be sufficient.

thuffman03

You can never have too much power.

I have owned 2 HK AVR's and they were rated at 35 and 65 wpc and I was never impressed with their power output. I do like listening to music at near concert levels so that most likely is why I have 500 wpc on my main 2 channel system.

Ron Temple

The HK 2xx is an excellent platform. It will drive the A5s without issue. I still use mine as a pre/pro, but prior to that I compared it to several quality entry to mid level AVRs from Onkyo, Pio and Denon and preferred the HK sound. There was no discernable lack of power, in fact the high capacitance of the HK gave it a cleaner an punchier sound than all of them (except the Denon 2307CI...though I still preferred the warmer HK). As stated the A5s aren't a load. They will improve with an amp, but the HK will sound very respectable.

kingtut

packetjones wrote: »

I appreciate all the additional responses. The first few responses made it sound like i would have to have an amp to enjoy the new speakers. I knwo that teh sub that i have is not the best but i got it opn the cheap $100. I work at best buy so i can get a good deal on all of these speakers.


Does anyone have any good recommnedations on budget amps if i find that i need one. I am thinking that a 2 or 3 channel amp should be sufficient.

Audiosource amps, good price & under-rated.

Ron Temple

kingtut wrote: »

Audiosource amps, good price & under-rated.

The first amp I added was an Audiosource Amp/One A. I bought it for $100 used. 80wpc X 2 and ran it on R50s and RTi8s, even my SDAs for a short time. It was a neutral, clean sounding amp and an improvement over the HK 2xx.

If you look in that direction, go with at least an Amp200 or 300. The Amp100 won't be enough of an upgrade.

kingtut

Ron, I am using the Amp Three and Amp One right now. They are both neutral sounding, but the Amp Three has more headroom, as expected.

kingtut

The Amp Three is the first version of the amp 310. It's far from an audiophile amp, but it's much, much better than most of the receiver's amp. It's very good value for the $.

Ron Temple

A buddy brought over an Amp300 he bought off CL. We plugged it in here and I was surprised at how much bass and punch this amp had. It wasn't as defined as my TFM45, but it had plenty of balls. I think he paid $110 for it.