Difference between SRS, 1.2, 1.2tl ???

Shicks18
Shicks18 Posts: 397
edited August 2009 in Vintage Speakers
Can someone explain? And also list them in order from best to worst

I looked at this: http://www.polksda.com/list.shtml

All it really explained was the dates of productions and MSRP. I imagine 1.2tl , 1.2, srs in that order. But what physical differences/benefits in each model?
TV: LG 55LW5600
Pre: Marantz SR6001
Front Amp: Parasound HCA-1000A
Center Amp: Marantz MA500
Mains: Polk LSi9
Center: Polk LSiC
Sub: HSU VTF-3 MK-2
Games: Xbox360 and PS3
Post edited by Shicks18 on

Comments

  • JohnLocke88
    JohnLocke88 Posts: 1,150
    edited August 2009
    I think most would agree the list goes 1.2TL, 1.2, SRS from greatest to leatest desirable. That said, I don't think anyone here would turn down a set of any of them.
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited August 2009
    Shicks18 wrote: »
    Can someone explain? And also list them in order from best to worst

    I looked at this: http://www.polksda.com/list.shtml

    All it really explained was the dates of productions and MSRP. I imagine 1.2tl , 1.2, srs in that order. But what physical differences/benefits in each model?
    The orginal SDA SRS is vitually a completely different speaker speaker than the 1.2 or 1.2TL other than I think the passive woofer and being similar in sze and driver layout.

    Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60079+



    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D
  • comfortablycurt
    comfortablycurt Posts: 6,745
    edited August 2009
    snow wrote: »
    The orginal SDA SRS is vitually a completely different speaker speaker than the 1.2 or 1.2TL other than I think the passive woofer and being similar in sze and driver layout.

    Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.




    REGARDS SNOW

    That's a very informative thread. I've wondered the same thing for a while myself.

    One last question that's not answered real clearly in that thread...

    The SRS used SL-2000's, the 1.2TL's used SL-3000's...what did the 1.2's use? SL-2000's I'm assuming...correct?
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Marantz UD5005 universal player
    Parasound Halo P5 preamp
    Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
    PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's
  • leroyjr1
    leroyjr1 Posts: 8,785
    edited August 2009
    Yes they used SL-2000's
  • bsoko2
    bsoko2 Posts: 1,449
    edited August 2009
    Help guys - What model had blade/blade for the A-1? There is a set near me that is blade/blade in good condition for 1200 and I was thinking about it. Is the Pin/blade more desirable?

    Bill
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited August 2009
    snow wrote: »
    The orginal SDA SRS is vitually a completely different speaker speaker than the 1.2 or 1.2TL other than I think the passive woofer and being similar in sze and driver layout.

    Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60079+



    REGARDS SNOW

    Thank you very much for that Snow, had to bookmark it for future reference. Sorry if I'm thread jacking but I'd like to add to the list of questions; What are the going rates for SDA SRS, 1.2's and 1.2TL's? Not looking for the "at a steal/great price" but more along the lines of an average price on a stock pair. :cool:

    -Freddy
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • JohnLocke88
    JohnLocke88 Posts: 1,150
    edited August 2009
    I'd say ball park $1,200 to $1,500; the main issue though is finding them for sale within three states of you...
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited August 2009
    kawizx9r wrote: »
    Thank you very much for that Snow, had to bookmark it for future reference. Sorry if I'm thread jacking but I'd like to add to the list of questions; What are the going rates for SDA SRS, 1.2's and 1.2TL's? Not looking for the "at a steal/great price" but more along the lines of an average price on a stock pair. :cool:

    -Freddy
    There seems to be no real established average rate for the big SDA models, I think because they are so hard to ship. If you live in a location where there is a large customer base you will most likely command a pretty good price if not anything is possible and even then it will depend on whether the seller knows what he has.

    I would think that the original SDA SRS woul typically sell for around 900- 1500 the 1.2 for 1000-1800 the 1.2TL for 1500-2500 but all can and will sell for much more or less depending on condition whether or not they have upgrades etc.

    For example I have seen original SDA SRS's sell for as much as $2000.00 and SDA SRS 1.2TL's sell for as little as $500.00 and as much as $3500.00.


    Personally I think if you can get any of the big 3 for less than $1500. you are getting a good deal as long as they are in good condition.

    I think I will start a thread for sales of the big 3 just to get an idea of prices and see whether we can compile enough sales info to get an average price and to see how much if any part demographics play in it.



    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D
  • bluecomet
    bluecomet Posts: 1,118
    edited August 2009
    That's a good idea. I have seen prices all over the board on these speakers. I spent $1200 on a mint set of original SRS'. The main reason I did not think twice was because of the condition and because they were two hours away from my house. Close enough to get them myself and not have to deal with shipping hassles. I totally agree with snow on this one.
    Polk HT system 1: LSIC, LSI25 mains, LSI F/X rears, Lsi F/X rear centers,
    Yamaha RX-V2500 System, Carver A753 3 channel amp.

    Polk HT system 2: , SRT system with f/x 1,000's rear speakers on 7.1 system currently using Onkyo TX-RZ820 receiver, powered by Sunfire Grand Theater amp

    Polk Speaker collection: SDA SRS 1.2tl x 2, SRT system, SDA SRS 2 P/B, SDA 2A, SDA 1C Studio, SDA CRS+, Monitor 7B & 4, SRS 3.1tl, RTA 15tl, LS90, LSI 9
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,136
    edited August 2009
    Snow hit the nail right on the head.
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited August 2009
    Figured I'd ask this in said-thread rather than make a new one because although this doesnt pertain to the bigger badboy 1.2's its still SDA-related.

    What's the difference between the drivers in PIC 1 and PIC 2, I'm referring to the top and bottom 6 1/2"s that have some sort of ring around the dust cap? Btw, I got these pictures from AVSforum and another forum google pulled up.

    Any advantages/disadvantages to this? Curiousity runs through me like crazy so I had to ask ;)

    Oh and yes I know they're 2.3's
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited August 2009
    kawizx9r wrote: »
    Figured I'd ask this in said-thread rather than make a new one because although this doesnt pertain to the bigger badboy 1.2's its still SDA-related.

    What's the difference between the drivers in PIC 1 and PIC 2, I'm referring to the top and bottom 6 1/2"s that have some sort of ring around the dust cap? Btw, I got these pictures from AVSforum and another forum google pulled up.

    Any advantages/disadvantages to this? Curiousity runs through me like crazy so I had to ask ;)

    Oh and yes I know they're 2.3's
    They were in the earlier 2.3 not TL models and they were used to increase bass, if I remember correctly they are weighted. Commonly referred to as donut drivers.



    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D
  • george daniel
    george daniel Posts: 12,096
    edited August 2009
    Also,, the ones with the "donut" drivers used sl-2000's while the 2.3 tl (no donut drivers) used sl-3000's
    JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited August 2009
    Ah sweet, learned something else about them. :D Are these drivers difficult to obtain? I don't ever see them pop up at all on eprey or here. I've just considered 2.3's if I wanted to go up from 1C's.
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited August 2009
    kawizx9r wrote: »
    Ah sweet, learned something else about them. :D Are these drivers difficult to obtain? I don't ever see them pop up at all on eprey or here. I've just considered 2.3's if I wanted to go up from 1C's.
    I think you can still buy replacement drivers from Polk.



    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D