Difference between SRS, 1.2, 1.2tl ???
Shicks18
Posts: 397
Can someone explain? And also list them in order from best to worst
I looked at this: http://www.polksda.com/list.shtml
All it really explained was the dates of productions and MSRP. I imagine 1.2tl , 1.2, srs in that order. But what physical differences/benefits in each model?
I looked at this: http://www.polksda.com/list.shtml
All it really explained was the dates of productions and MSRP. I imagine 1.2tl , 1.2, srs in that order. But what physical differences/benefits in each model?
TV: LG 55LW5600
Pre: Marantz SR6001
Front Amp: Parasound HCA-1000A
Center Amp: Marantz MA500
Mains: Polk LSi9
Center: Polk LSiC
Sub: HSU VTF-3 MK-2
Games: Xbox360 and PS3
Pre: Marantz SR6001
Front Amp: Parasound HCA-1000A
Center Amp: Marantz MA500
Mains: Polk LSi9
Center: Polk LSiC
Sub: HSU VTF-3 MK-2
Games: Xbox360 and PS3
Post edited by Shicks18 on
Comments
-
I think most would agree the list goes 1.2TL, 1.2, SRS from greatest to leatest desirable. That said, I don't think anyone here would turn down a set of any of them.
-
Can someone explain? And also list them in order from best to worst
I looked at this: http://www.polksda.com/list.shtml
All it really explained was the dates of productions and MSRP. I imagine 1.2tl , 1.2, srs in that order. But what physical differences/benefits in each model?
Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60079+
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
The orginal SDA SRS is vitually a completely different speaker speaker than the 1.2 or 1.2TL other than I think the passive woofer and being similar in sze and driver layout.
Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.
REGARDS SNOW
That's a very informative thread. I've wondered the same thing for a while myself.
One last question that's not answered real clearly in that thread...
The SRS used SL-2000's, the 1.2TL's used SL-3000's...what did the 1.2's use? SL-2000's I'm assuming...correct?The nirvana inducer-
APC H10 Power Conditioner
Marantz UD5005 universal player
Parasound Halo P5 preamp
Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's -
Yes they used SL-2000's
-
Help guys - What model had blade/blade for the A-1? There is a set near me that is blade/blade in good condition for 1200 and I was thinking about it. Is the Pin/blade more desirable?
BillMy 2012 HT Room - http://www.avsforum.com/t/1416077/bsoko2-new-ht-june-2012 -
The orginal SDA SRS is vitually a completely different speaker speaker than the 1.2 or 1.2TL other than I think the passive woofer and being similar in sze and driver layout.
Try here and see if this answers all your questions and it will save me some typing.
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60079+
REGARDS SNOW
Thank you very much for that Snow, had to bookmark it for future reference. Sorry if I'm thread jacking but I'd like to add to the list of questions; What are the going rates for SDA SRS, 1.2's and 1.2TL's? Not looking for the "at a steal/great price" but more along the lines of an average price on a stock pair. :cool:
-FreddyTruck setup
Alpine 9856
Phoenix Gold RSD65CS
For Sale
Polk SR6500
Polk SR5250
Polk SR104Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec. -
I'd say ball park $1,200 to $1,500; the main issue though is finding them for sale within three states of you...
-
Thank you very much for that Snow, had to bookmark it for future reference. Sorry if I'm thread jacking but I'd like to add to the list of questions; What are the going rates for SDA SRS, 1.2's and 1.2TL's? Not looking for the "at a steal/great price" but more along the lines of an average price on a stock pair. :cool:
-Freddy
I would think that the original SDA SRS woul typically sell for around 900- 1500 the 1.2 for 1000-1800 the 1.2TL for 1500-2500 but all can and will sell for much more or less depending on condition whether or not they have upgrades etc.
For example I have seen original SDA SRS's sell for as much as $2000.00 and SDA SRS 1.2TL's sell for as little as $500.00 and as much as $3500.00.
Personally I think if you can get any of the big 3 for less than $1500. you are getting a good deal as long as they are in good condition.
I think I will start a thread for sales of the big 3 just to get an idea of prices and see whether we can compile enough sales info to get an average price and to see how much if any part demographics play in it.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
That's a good idea. I have seen prices all over the board on these speakers. I spent $1200 on a mint set of original SRS'. The main reason I did not think twice was because of the condition and because they were two hours away from my house. Close enough to get them myself and not have to deal with shipping hassles. I totally agree with snow on this one.Polk HT system 1: LSIC, LSI25 mains, LSI F/X rears, Lsi F/X rear centers,
Yamaha RX-V2500 System, Carver A753 3 channel amp.
Polk HT system 2: , SRT system with f/x 1,000's rear speakers on 7.1 system currently using Onkyo TX-RZ820 receiver, powered by Sunfire Grand Theater amp
Polk Speaker collection: SDA SRS 1.2tl x 2, SRT system, SDA SRS 2 P/B, SDA 2A, SDA 1C Studio, SDA CRS+, Monitor 7B & 4, SRS 3.1tl, RTA 15tl, LS90, LSI 9 -
Snow hit the nail right on the head.
-
Figured I'd ask this in said-thread rather than make a new one because although this doesnt pertain to the bigger badboy 1.2's its still SDA-related.
What's the difference between the drivers in PIC 1 and PIC 2, I'm referring to the top and bottom 6 1/2"s that have some sort of ring around the dust cap? Btw, I got these pictures from AVSforum and another forum google pulled up.
Any advantages/disadvantages to this? Curiousity runs through me like crazy so I had to ask
Oh and yes I know they're 2.3'sTruck setup
Alpine 9856
Phoenix Gold RSD65CS
For Sale
Polk SR6500
Polk SR5250
Polk SR104Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec. -
Figured I'd ask this in said-thread rather than make a new one because although this doesnt pertain to the bigger badboy 1.2's its still SDA-related.
What's the difference between the drivers in PIC 1 and PIC 2, I'm referring to the top and bottom 6 1/2"s that have some sort of ring around the dust cap? Btw, I got these pictures from AVSforum and another forum google pulled up.
Any advantages/disadvantages to this? Curiousity runs through me like crazy so I had to ask
Oh and yes I know they're 2.3's
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
Also,, the ones with the "donut" drivers used sl-2000's while the 2.3 tl (no donut drivers) used sl-3000'sJC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)
-
Ah sweet, learned something else about them. Are these drivers difficult to obtain? I don't ever see them pop up at all on eprey or here. I've just considered 2.3's if I wanted to go up from 1C's.Truck setup
Alpine 9856
Phoenix Gold RSD65CS
For Sale
Polk SR6500
Polk SR5250
Polk SR104Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec. -
Ah sweet, learned something else about them. Are these drivers difficult to obtain? I don't ever see them pop up at all on eprey or here. I've just considered 2.3's if I wanted to go up from 1C's.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all