SACD: Tommy vs. DSOTM?
obieone
Posts: 5,077
My limited experience with SACD had me raise this question: Is Tommy as good or close to DSOTM? Just looking for feedback on SQ, and the appeal of the way the tracks were mixed?
Thanks
Thanks
I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!
Post edited by obieone on
Comments
-
Are you talking for 2-channel, or for surround?Jay
SDA 2BTL * Musical Fidelity A5cr amp * Oppo BDP-93 * Modded Adcom GDA-600 DAC * Rythmik F8 (x2)
Micro Seiki DQ-50 * Hagerman Cornet 2 Phono * A hodgepodge of cabling * Belkin PF60
Preamp rotation: Krell KSL (SCompRacer recapped) * Manley Shrimp * PS Audio 5.0 -
Is Tommy as good or close to DSOTM?
Nope. That said, you should still buy it.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
You know what? I've had Tommy on SACD for a while now and I have yet to give it a listen. DOH! Thanks for the reminder. That said, DSOTM is one fantastic recording, especially with a great system.~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
-
Nope. That said, you should still buy it.
I agree on both counts. Guitar players should not be allowed to play with mixing boards. (see also: Jimmy Page):D -
I'm sure I'm comparing apples to oranges, so I guess I should've just asked:
Is it worth it?:oI refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE! -
I know this thread is a few months old but I just picked up Tommy on SACD and it is pretty incredible. I haven't listened to the album (LP) in quite some time and I am sitting hear completely enjoying as I type.
Pete Townshend did seem to emphasize the vocals and guitars a little more over the original mix, sometimes maybe too much. It could be LP vs SACD.?. The original masters were recorded at a less than state of the art studio even in it's day and you can hear some of the artifacts (The band was struggling financially at the time). This is mainly present in the percussions that seem less defined and seem to distort like they are over driving the mic/amp but it draws you back to the age when it was originally recorded. This distortion may be why the guitars and vocals would be emphasized more.
I also have DSOTM but I'd rather not compare. I enjoy both for different reasons and moods. Technically, I'd say DSOTM is a better recording mainly because it likely had better master recordings.
If you are a Who fan, I highly recommend Tommy on SACD. The included demos and out-takes are a nice addition. It is (was) available on DVD-Audio and includes a Pete Townshend interview video.Stan
Main 2ch:
Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Benchmark DAC1, Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i; Technics SL-J2, Parasound PPH-100.
HT:
Marantz SR7010, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW110 , Marantz UD5005, Pioneer PL-530, Panasonic TC-P42S60
Other stuff:
Denon: DRA-835R, AVR-888, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, 5B, TSi100, RM7, PSW10 (DXi104 upgrade); Pioneer: CT-6R; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, CDR-615; Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii, Sony CDP-650ESD, Technics SA 5070, B&W DM601