2-way vs 3-way Component Systems

jay27
jay27 Posts: 105
edited August 2009 in Car Audio & Electronics
I've never run a 3-way system before, but am considering it. The thought is that more of the frequency range would be coming from around the dash instead of near the floor. Does anyone have any input on going 3-way instead of 2-way?
Post edited by jay27 on

Comments

  • Kinetic
    Kinetic Posts: 437
    edited August 2009
    I dont run it, but i recently heard the CDT and the Morel, and they sound more clear than the 2 way, and its more close to a home audio.
    Z
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    Polk Audio SR 6500
    Polk Audio SR 124 DVC
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable

    G35
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    /////Alpine SPX 17PRO
    /////Alpine SWX 1243D
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable
  • cadenceclipse
    cadenceclipse Posts: 459
    edited August 2009
    jay27 wrote: »
    I've never run a 3-way system before, but am considering it. The thought is that more of the frequency range would be coming from around the dash instead of near the floor. Does anyone have any input on going 3-way instead of 2-way?

    why around dash more? cause of placement(where speakers r located)? can't really see the need 4 it specially considering price and power requirements over something like sr 2-way or even something like MM6501s. most 3-ways r probably in the $1000 range...lotta dough
    Polk MM6501 kick panels, Eclipse cd7200mkll and SW9122 Bomb Box, Cadence A4, A7, CAP5, JL8W3V3
  • jay27
    jay27 Posts: 105
    edited August 2009
    Well, when I finally placed the SR tweeters on the sail panels, it made the biggest difference to date as far as better sound from my speakers. So my thinking was that if I played more of the frequencies up around the dash, the sound might improve further. It would make the install more complicated for sure, though. And I imagine tuning might be that much more difficult as well.
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited August 2009
    The SR tweeter biggest negative is that they are EXTREMELY directional so having them down low doesnt work well at all unless theyre pointed right at you. So dash locations for these tweets (and most tweets in my experience) is the best spot for them.

    Now are you talking about a true 3 way? As in tweeter, midrange, midbass and subwoofer? If so then I suggest sticking to a 2 way. The more speakers you have the more complicated things become and the harder they are to fix. Getting the midbass to play in phase with the mids and getting all the time correction right is a pain and since the only real gain to a 3 way is better midbass ala the dedicated midbass speakers, Ill do without. A 2 way system will almost always sound better with less work.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • jay27
    jay27 Posts: 105
    edited August 2009
    Thanks for the input. Instead of the true 3-way, what do you think about running a subwoofer, midbass, and full range speakers that can play from about 500-20khz?
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited August 2009
    +1 to what Mac said.

    A good friend got caught up in the 3way hype and installed 3way rainbow comps running off the rainbow preamp+power amp off a 9887. He spent close to the equvalent of $3k and asked me if I could help with the tunning cause his setup sounded like crap.

    To cut a long story short I spent 9 hrs over 3 days trying to set the tunning and I failed. I tried everyting to get coherence between the drivers but it just didnt work. Trying to manage 3 xover points (he also runs a sub), and trying to time align the 7 drivers was just too much.

    Get good 2ways biamped off a 4ch amp with a good sub running off a monoblock.
  • cadenceclipse
    cadenceclipse Posts: 459
    edited August 2009
    500-20k? what kinda full-ranges r those? 3 1/2" kenwoods? so u have SR components but want more midbass?? what sub u running?
    Polk MM6501 kick panels, Eclipse cd7200mkll and SW9122 Bomb Box, Cadence A4, A7, CAP5, JL8W3V3
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited August 2009
    if I played more of the frequencies up around the dash, the sound might improve further.

    No. You only need the highs (tweets) at close to ear level. This sets the height from which your ears percieve the sound. Thats just the way your mind and ears process sound.

    You need the lows/mids down low and forward on your door panel. Lesser pathlength variation. This setup would give you better coherence and sound stage height.

    The fact that the sr tweets are highly directional, like mac pointed out, makes it even more imp to mount the the sr tweets closer to ear level.

    Honestly, if you have the sr's, mount them properly and then focus on tuning them. Don't over think and over complicate the issue by thinking 3 ways or additional drivers. You will kill the coherence in your sound.
  • jay27
    jay27 Posts: 105
    edited August 2009
    Thanks for all of the advice!
  • jay27
    jay27 Posts: 105
    edited August 2009
    500-20k? what kinda full-ranges r those? 3 1/2" kenwoods? so u have SR components but want more midbass?? what sub u running?

    I was actually thinking of something more like this:
    http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=264-844

    I would have put this somewhere on the dash.
  • Kinetic
    Kinetic Posts: 437
    edited August 2009
    arun1963 wrote: »
    +1 to what Mac said.

    A good friend got caught up in the 3way hype and installed 3way rainbow comps running off the rainbow preamp+power amp off a 9887. He spent close to the equvalent of $3k and asked me if I could help with the tunning cause his setup sounded like crap.

    To cut a long story short I spent 9 hrs over 3 days trying to set the tunning and I failed. I tried everyting to get coherence between the drivers but it just didnt work. Trying to manage 3 xover points (he also runs a sub), and trying to time align the 7 drivers was just too much.

    Get good 2ways biamped off a 4ch amp with a good sub running off a monoblock.

    if he has the 9887 why didnt try the Imprint Module?
    its amazing if you do it right, i have the doc that an alpine tech guy release with all the tricks, and it is amazing really..

    its close to a profesional human tuning..
    Z
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    Polk Audio SR 6500
    Polk Audio SR 124 DVC
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable

    G35
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    /////Alpine SPX 17PRO
    /////Alpine SWX 1243D
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited August 2009
    why didnt try the Imprint Module?

    cause he ran out of $$$ :D

    doing it manually though is really tough.
  • Kinetic
    Kinetic Posts: 437
    edited August 2009
    i can borrow mine, but I live in Mexico City..

    although if he buy it, just ask me for the Alpine document, it will make a huge difference
    Z
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    Polk Audio SR 6500
    Polk Audio SR 124 DVC
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable

    G35
    /////Alpine CDA-9887 HU
    /////Alpine KTX-1000EQ
    /////Alpine PDX-4.150
    /////Alpine PDX-1.1000
    /////Alpine SPX 17PRO
    /////Alpine SWX 1243D
    KnuKonceptz MKS Kable
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited August 2009
    Kinetic wrote: »
    i can borrow mine, but I live in Mexico City..

    although if he buy it, just ask me for the Alpine document, it will make a huge difference

    I passed your msg on and it seems that he isn't going to be buying anything for a while. His wife found out how much he had spent on the system........:D

    So he's stuck with what he has, for a while.
  • tk421
    tk421 Posts: 156
    edited August 2009
    theoretically, 3 way is best. in practice, difficult. in reality it's a four way setup cause u also got a sub woofer.

    the push for 3 way is clear. let each driver play a defined range and avoid wave distortion. this approach is used in a lot of high end home audio. but in a car, it;s hard to do. u really need to keep the speakers within inches of each other to give a point source effect. else, u got real tuning and positioning to do!

    tuning them requires understanding IDT and IID and thus, setting your crossover points to suit. choosing a good 3 way speaker system should involve a woofer that plays as low as possible. at least down to 50 hz comfortably. then u let the sub play sub bass. it is hard to find a 6" that can do 50 hz at the level u want it to. (ie - if u want it loud. i like my bass to hit and hurt.)