Driver Compliment question on CRS+
smglbrth
Posts: 1,481
I am inquiring about the drivers on the SDA-CRS+ (since they had at least three different variations?) Anyway the CRS+'s have the blade/blade cable. Am I to conclude then, from looking at the driver/tweeter SDA list, that these particular CRS+'s have the MW6510's for both drivers? Also, since the SL2000 is the original tweet this could be changed out for the new replacement, if desired?
Remember, when you're running from something, you're running to something...-me
Post edited by smglbrth on
Comments
-
My preference is to retain originality if possible.
mw6510 (stereo)
mw6511 (dimensional)
sl2000 (high frequency)
or RD0194 new replacements (??) -
I am inquiring about the drivers on the SDA-CRS+ (since they had at least three different variations?) Anyway the CRS+'s have the blade/blade cable. Am I to conclude then, from looking at the driver/tweeter SDA list, that these particular CRS+'s have the MW6510's for both drivers? Also, since the SL2000 is the original tweet this could be changed out for the new replacement, if desired?
There is a 4.1 TL upgrade you can perform on the CRS+ that would transform your current speakers into something very special.
Here's the link on how to;
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46489 -
great link... a DarqueKnight comprehensive posting ...
all the details and explanations included. -
Anyway the CRS+'s have the blade/blade cable. Am I to conclude then, from looking at the driver/tweeter SDA list, that these particular CRS+'s have the MW6510's for both drivers? Also, since the SL2000 is the original tweet this could be changed out for the new replacement, if desired?
Correct.
Yes, you want the RD0194-1.There is a 4.1 TL upgrade you can perform on the CRS+ that would transform your current speakers into something very special.
Hang on, the CRS+ with the blade/blade IC has a slightly different high frequency circuit. It appears that the 2.7ohm resistor in series with the HF inductor could be removed, but I'm not sure how that would effect the overall balance.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Thanks for the info! I don't actually own these pair but was kind of interested in some for sale in the forum. Just looking for the correct information since it seems that replacement drivers are getting more scarce and I already have extra 6510's. I'm not even sure what Polk actually offers anymore considering mid-drivers...
Remember, when you're running from something, you're running to something...-me -
Correct.
Yes, you want the RD0194-1.
In the post by DarqueKnight, he shows RDO198's on his parts list (but refers to 194's earlier in the post). Now the 194's come up again. Which do I want for my 4.1 TL upgrade? Which gives the best result?
Thanks."The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." Neil deGrasse Tyson. -
198's for the 4.1 TL upgrade. 194 for the stock crossover.I like speakers that are bigger than a small refrigerator but smaller than a big refrigerator:D
-
MillerLiteScott wrote: »198's for the 4.1 TL upgrade. 194 for the stock crossover.
Thanks."The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it." Neil deGrasse Tyson.
