Perfect Stereo Room Dimensions

wizzy
wizzy Posts: 867
edited June 2009 in 2 Channel Audio
I can't seem to find this again and wondered if anyone knew ...

I remember seeing an article on how if you could build your stereo room to any dimensions you wanted, there was a plan and/or ratios that if you built the walls to ... dimensions, etc ... such that even if you built the room out of materials which were highly reflective it would be fine.

Does anyone have a link or info on this?

W
Post edited by wizzy on

Comments

  • CoolJazz
    CoolJazz Posts: 570
    edited June 2009
    There is a number of different pieces of advice on the web. Some better than others... But you might be thinking of the Cardas site. You can get the ratios there anyway.

    But your comment as to the size of the room precluding the treatments for reflective surfaces is incorrect. The dimensional part is to avoid build up resonant modes...ie...low frequency points. Every measurement has a resultant frequency. You are designing to avoid a similar resonance in a second length. So if a certain measurement has a resultant resonance of 100hz (and harmonics of 200 and 300), then you don't want another direction of the three in the room to also equal any of these numbers.

    High frequency slap, reflection points from walls, floors and ceilings are all together a different issue. Best room treatment is to not overly dampen a room, just dampen the primary reflections but allow the room to still have some natural decay and liveness. Over deadening gets a black background but is not natural sounding unless you spent your life living in a richly decorated hotel room. :cool:

    CoolJazz
    A so called science type proudly says... "I do realize that I would fool myself all the time, about listening conclusions and many other observations, if I did listen before buying. That’s why I don’t, I bought all of my current gear based on technical parameters alone, such as specs and measurements."

    More amazing Internet Science Pink Panther wisdom..."My DAC has since been upgraded from Mark Levinson to Topping."
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited June 2009
    wizzy wrote: »

    Does anyone have a link or info on this?
    http://www.ethanwiner.com/acoustics.html
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • CoolJazz
    CoolJazz Posts: 570
    edited June 2009
    Wiener knows his stuff regarding acoustics but is a blithering idiot regarding electronics. :D

    For example....He's "determined" that jitter is a non-issue! Among several other absolute lunatic ideas. So approach with care...
    A so called science type proudly says... "I do realize that I would fool myself all the time, about listening conclusions and many other observations, if I did listen before buying. That’s why I don’t, I bought all of my current gear based on technical parameters alone, such as specs and measurements."

    More amazing Internet Science Pink Panther wisdom..."My DAC has since been upgraded from Mark Levinson to Topping."
  • Systems
    Systems Posts: 14,873
    edited June 2009
    CoolJazz wrote: »
    Wiener knows his stuff regarding acoustics but is a blithering idiot regarding electronics. :D
    I won't disagree, he is abit of an extremist but on the acoustics side he does offer some good advice and the linked article does have some useful nuggets of wisdom that if applied can improve the sound of ones listening room.
    Testing
    Testing
    Testing
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited June 2009
    Square room = no, no
  • wizzy
    wizzy Posts: 867
    edited June 2009
    Square room = no, no

    Hmm, just out of curiosity, what if your room walls formed a sphere?

    Kind of like the Cerebro room.
  • CoolJazz
    CoolJazz Posts: 570
    edited June 2009
    wizzy wrote: »
    Hmm, just out of curiosity, what if your room walls formed a sphere?

    Kind of like the Cerebro room.

    Then you find yourself with an unexplainable hunger for chicken salad sandwiches while listening... :p
    A so called science type proudly says... "I do realize that I would fool myself all the time, about listening conclusions and many other observations, if I did listen before buying. That’s why I don’t, I bought all of my current gear based on technical parameters alone, such as specs and measurements."

    More amazing Internet Science Pink Panther wisdom..."My DAC has since been upgraded from Mark Levinson to Topping."
  • mshan242700
    mshan242700 Posts: 823
    edited June 2009
    The Rives Audio website also has some good info on optimizing room for optimal acoustics.
  • rru2s
    rru2s Posts: 90
    edited June 2009
    Interesting that the acoustical properties of a sphere were mentioned. While very few would find it practical or affordable to constuct a home listening room in this shape, it is noteworthy that certain curved shapes behind the speakers may in fact create some very uneven room acoustics. For example, has anyone ever been to one of those "whisper rooms" in a science museum whereby whispering from a focal point near one end of an oval-shaped room results in highly efficient transmission of sounds to a similar focal point at the other end? This effect is because the curved shape reflects all sounds emanating from one point off of the rear walls at the precise angle for the sound waves to converge at the listener's spot at focal point at the other end of the room. I seriously doubt that the anyone would want to design a room with such a tiny "sweet spot". However, if the curvature were designed in other ways, for example, a slight bowed shape similar to the outer cabinets of the current RTi series speakers, then this would be a very effective way to reduce reflective reinforcement of certain frequencies somewhat.
    Living Room system: 52"HDTV, 4 Mon.70s, Epik Valor, Outlaw RR2150
    Bedroom System: 2 Mon.60s,Velo VRP1200, HK3490
  • Hawkeye
    Hawkeye Posts: 1,313
    edited June 2009
    GV#27 wrote: »
    I won't disagree, he is abit of an extremist but on the acoustics side he does offer some good advice and the linked article does have some useful nuggets of wisdom that if applied can improve the sound of ones listening room.

    Aren't we all a bit on the extreme side of audio? ;)

    Gordon
    2 Channel -
    Martin Logan Spire, 2 JL Audio F112 subs
    McIntosh C1000 Controller with Tube pre amp, 2 MC501 amplifiers, MD1K Transport & DAC, MR-88 Tuner
    WireWorld Eclipse 6.0 speaker wire and jumpers, Eclipse 5^2 Squared Balanced IC's. Silver Eclipse PCs (5)
    Symposium Rollerblocks 2+ (16)Black Diamond Racing Mk 3 pits (8)
  • NotaSuv
    NotaSuv Posts: 3,851
    edited June 2009
    rru2s wrote: »
    Interesting that the acoustical properties of a sphere were mentioned. While very few would find it practical or affordable to constuct a home listening room in this shape, it is noteworthy that certain curved shapes behind the speakers may in fact create some very uneven room acoustics. For example, has anyone ever been to one of those "whisper rooms" in a science museum whereby whispering from a focal point near one end of an oval-shaped room results in highly efficient transmission of sounds to a similar focal point at the other end? This effect is because the curved shape reflects all sounds emanating from one point off of the rear walls at the precise angle for the sound waves to converge at the listener's spot at focal point at the other end of the room. I seriously doubt that the anyone would want to design a room with such a tiny "sweet spot". However, if the curvature were designed in other ways, for example, a slight bowed shape similar to the outer cabinets of the current RTi series speakers, then this would be a very effective way to reduce reflective reinforcement of certain frequencies somewhat.

    there is a great example of this at Grand Central Station in NYC.....near the oyster bar
  • jm1
    jm1 Posts: 618
    edited June 2009
    Height Width Length
    1.00 : 1.14 : 1.39
    1.00 : 1.28 : 1.54
    1.00 : 1.60 : 2.33

    ex.
    8' ceiling
    12' 9" width
    18' 6" length
    All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed and third, it is accepted as self evident.
    Arthur Schopenhauer
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited June 2009
    This is off the subject but I was talking to a guy who installs High End HT systems and jm1s ratios look good. This guys Demo room has a 8K Sony HD projector, And all Meridian system, with two Monster Atlantic Tech subs and a rectangular 12' x 19' X 10' (height). Watched a Blu-ray on this--sound treatments on all (and I mean ALL surfaces--with home theater seating--and something like Buttkickers under the seats).

    Sounded pretty impressive!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]