Report: “New” Chrysler will be off the hook for any defective vehicles made before Ap

venomclan
venomclan Posts: 2,467
edited May 2009 in The Clubhouse
This should help sales, insurance costs and resale value...

http://www.leftlanenews.com/report-new-chrysler-will-be-off-the-hook-for-any-defective-vehicles-made-before-april-30.html

Report: “New” Chrysler will be off the hook for any defective vehicles made before April 30
05/22/2009, 8:56 AM
By Drew Johnson

Chrysler’s bankruptcy was supposed to be quick and surgical, but the automaker’s Chapter 11 filing is proving to be anything but to the current owners of Chrysler vehicles. The Michigan automaker has already bounced a number of lemon law settlement checks and now comes word that the company will wash its hands of any major vehicle defects through its bankruptcy filing.

When the ‘new’ Chrysler emerges from bankruptcy it will still honor all normal warranty claims, but will be legally clear of any major defects, even if they are recall-related. “You have the “new” Chrysler agreeing to be responsible for all the warranty claims and if a wheel falls off and it’s under warranty then they’ll fix it,” Liability lawyer Larry Coben told ABC News. “But if the wheel falls off and the car rolls over and you’re catastrophically injured, then they have no responsibility.”
Under the current terms of the Chrysler bankruptcy, consumers injured by a defective Chrysler vehicle produced before the company’s bankruptcy filing won’t even be allowed, by law, to sue the automaker.
However, a number of consumer groups, such as Public Citizen, Center for Auto Safety, Consumer Action, Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, and the National Association of Consumer Advocates, are speaking out against Chrysler’s bankruptcy. A congressional hearing to discuss the matter has been set for this week, but the bankruptcy court is expected to push through Chrysler’s case as soon as next week.
In addition to those who have been injured by a Chrysler vehicle, those who own a Chrysler vehicle will likely be hurt by the courts ruling. With Chrysler now taking no responsibility for vehicles built before April 30th, Chrysler’s resale values are expected to plummet even further.
Post edited by venomclan on

Comments

  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited May 2009
    Another good reason to continue buying Honda. This can happen to you know who else.
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • concealer404
    concealer404 Posts: 7,440
    edited May 2009
    It's so BEAUTIFUL when the gubment starts messing with this, ain't it?
    I don't read the newsssspaperssss because dey aaaallllllllll...... have ugly print.

    Living Room: B&K Reference 5 S2 / Parasound HCA-1000A / Emotiva XDA-2 / Pioneer BDP-51FD / Paradigm 11se MKiii

    Desk: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / ISK HD9999

    Office: Schiit Magni 2 Uber / Schiit Modi 2 Uber / Dynaco SCA-80Q / Paradigm Legend V.3

    HT: Denon AVR-X3400H / Sony UBP-X700 / RT16 / CS350LS / RT7 / SVS PB1000
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,711
    edited May 2009
    I am not familiar with the "Left Lane News"... is their journalistic credibility well-documented?
  • obieone
    obieone Posts: 5,077
    edited May 2009
    Even IF the story is bogus, it DOES sound like something the new MAJORITY shareholder would put out. And IF it is true, stand by....


    I just may trade in my S-10 for a Honda. But I hate to go back in debt.
    I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited May 2009
    Even if the story is credible, I am not worried concerning my current and soon to be owned Mopar products. The only time in recent years when there was a product defect so serious as to cause a real potential with life & limb loss was the 1999 Ford Bridgestone/Firestone debicle. The tires would suddenly delaminate with certain SUVs and cause crashes. This nearly put Bridgestone out of business.
  • dudeinaroom
    dudeinaroom Posts: 3,609
    edited May 2009
    obieone wrote: »
    Even IF the story is bogus, it DOES sound like something the new MAJORITY shareholder would put out. And IF it is true, stand by....


    I just may trade in my S-10 for a Honda. But I hate to go back in debt.

    ?????????????????????????????????????
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    Chrysler already is getting enough of my money indirectly without my consent, and they are not going to pay back one red cent of the "loans", although you have to look to find that information because the media just refuses to put it out there. They'll reorganize and go on in some form.

    I'll not ever willingly buy one of their products again, and yes I have owned and loved Mopar in the past.
  • dpowell
    dpowell Posts: 3,067
    edited May 2009
    Too bad. Buying American used to be patriotic. I don't see buying from the Federal Government to be a patriotic act. I'll stick with Toyota thanks.
    ____________________________________________________________

    polkaudio Fully Modded SDA SRS 1.2TLs + Dreadnaught, LSiM706c, 4 X Polk Surrounds + 4 X ATMOS, SVS PB13 Ultra X 2, Pass Labs X1, Marantz 7704, Bob Carver Crimson Beauty 350 Tube Mono Blocks, Carver Sunfire Signature Cinema Grande 400x5, ADCOM GFA 7807, Panasonic UB420, Moon 380D DAC, EPSON Pro Cinema 6050
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    dpowell wrote: »
    Too bad. Buying American used to be patriotic. I don't see buying from the Federal Government to be a patriotic act. I'll stick with Toyota thanks.

    Agreed on all three points, and it is too bad. It does not make me happy, but in my own little world, I'm too big to fail, even though our government doesn't seem to care about that.
  • obieone
    obieone Posts: 5,077
    edited May 2009
    ?????????????????????????????????????

    I'll explain: Thanks to the Messiah, the UAW now has 55% of Chrysler, WITHOUT putting up any $$$$. The U.S. taxpayer owns 8%, after putting up $4,000,000,000!!! And the actual BOND holders were GIVEN 29 cents on the dollar.
    Just a few FACTS that the mainstream media REFUSES to report.:mad:

    And one more thing: The Chrysler dealerships that are losing their flags, are NOT being compensated.
    For ANYTHING!!
    I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    Agreed on all three points, and it is too bad. It does not make me happy, but in my own little world, I'm too big to fail, even though our government doesn't seem to care about that.

    ...and no , I don't want the government to bail me out in any form.

    All I would ask is that they keep their hands out of my pocket and nose out of my life and give me a chance to use the talent and opportunity that I have to better myself and the world around me, and to do all of that before and instead of destroying our system of free enterprise and capitalism.
  • sucks2beme
    sucks2beme Posts: 5,601
    edited May 2009
    It's called filing for protection. Why would this be a surprize?
    Filing means anything could be refused. That includes pensions,
    bonuses, debts, etc. If they owe money, sorry, piggy bank's empty.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    sucks2beme wrote: »
    It's called filing for protection. Why would this be a surprize?
    Filing means anything could be refused. That includes pensions,
    bonuses, debts, etc. If they owe money, sorry, piggy bank's empty.

    That sounds good as long as the Feds don't decide to make up the difference with more of my tax dollars somehow....they wouldn't do THAT would they???
  • dpowell
    dpowell Posts: 3,067
    edited May 2009
    obieone wrote: »

    And one more thing: The Chrysler dealerships that are losing their flags, are NOT being compensated.
    For ANYTHING!!

    I heard reported that some dealerships that are quite profitable are being shut down while others that are underperfoming are left untouched. Seems that it may be more related to political affiliation that $$'s now that the Feds are running the business.
    ____________________________________________________________

    polkaudio Fully Modded SDA SRS 1.2TLs + Dreadnaught, LSiM706c, 4 X Polk Surrounds + 4 X ATMOS, SVS PB13 Ultra X 2, Pass Labs X1, Marantz 7704, Bob Carver Crimson Beauty 350 Tube Mono Blocks, Carver Sunfire Signature Cinema Grande 400x5, ADCOM GFA 7807, Panasonic UB420, Moon 380D DAC, EPSON Pro Cinema 6050
  • sucks2beme
    sucks2beme Posts: 5,601
    edited May 2009
    Bottom Line, they should of let them all file. All that money went down a rat hole. They file, and then they HAVE to take action. End of story. Our money
    wasn't going to help a lost cause.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • dpowell
    dpowell Posts: 3,067
    edited May 2009
    Our elected officials had all of their union boss donors to try and keep happy. They couldn't just let them fail. I'd love to see a comparison of the number of small to medium businesses that have failed contrasted to the number of 'bailed out' businesses. I bet the number would speak volumes about how much the "chosen one" really cares about saving jobs.
    ____________________________________________________________

    polkaudio Fully Modded SDA SRS 1.2TLs + Dreadnaught, LSiM706c, 4 X Polk Surrounds + 4 X ATMOS, SVS PB13 Ultra X 2, Pass Labs X1, Marantz 7704, Bob Carver Crimson Beauty 350 Tube Mono Blocks, Carver Sunfire Signature Cinema Grande 400x5, ADCOM GFA 7807, Panasonic UB420, Moon 380D DAC, EPSON Pro Cinema 6050
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    dpowell wrote: »
    Our elected officials had all of their union boss donors to try and keep happy. They couldn't just let them fail. I'd love to see a comparison of the number of small to medium businesses that have failed contrasted to the number of 'bailed out' businesses. I bet the number would speak volumes about how much the "chosen one" really cares about saving jobs.

    Part of the irony of this is that the small businesses are an integral part of making our economy move and grow. They are the ones that take the risks and meet the unmet needs.
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited May 2009
    dpowell wrote: »
    I heard reported that some dealerships that are quite profitable are being shut down while others that are underperfoming are left untouched. Seems that it may be more related to political affiliation that $$'s now that the Feds are running the business.

    I've been looking at some of the dealers in my state that are on the LIST and think you may be correct. Not sure what that is about, unless they are looking to establish geographic uniformity in dealership presence ... which doesn't make sense to me. Hell, if a local area is selling a lot of my product, then my feeling would be to leave them alone. A dealer cannot buy, unless he/she pushes their existing inventory out of the door within given time frames to take more on. How they stay in business is their concern.

    About other commentary about whether or not $ should be loaned or invested in them by Uncle Sam, my 2 cents is that it preserves jobs and has cost one helova less than the money doled out to the banks that has gotten us all into this mess to begin with. Chrysler and GM are not giving out million dollar bonuses to their senior folks after getting on the dole, like the banks are.
  • average_guy
    average_guy Posts: 236
    edited May 2009
    I've been looking at some of the dealers in my state that are on the LIST and think you may be correct. Not sure what that is about, unless they are looking to establish geographic uniformity in dealership presence ... which doesn't make sense to me. Hell, if a local area is selling a lot of my product, then my feeling would be to leave them alone. A dealer cannot buy, unless he/she pushes their existing inventory out of the door within given time frames to take more on. How they stay in business is their concern.

    About other commentary about whether or not $ should be loaned or invested in them by Uncle Sam, my 2 cents is that it preserves jobs and has cost one helova less than the money doled out to the banks that has gotten us all into this mess to begin with. Chrysler and GM are not giving out million dollar bonuses to their senior folks after getting on the dole, like the banks are.


    Chrysler and GM are also not paying back the "loans". Chrysler has already publicly stated that the loans will not be paid back, with GM to follow suit shortly. The press refuses to report this. In addition, jacking up our tax rates (yes, this will happen) to prop up a failing industry that makes a product that is inferior to its competition may be in tune with the Feds logic and they may be able to present it as "preserving jobs" with the help of a lapdog press and media but in fact higher taxes (that all of us will have to pay for this) have the effect of contracting an economy and net job loss.

    The union support for politicians will continue, and that is what this is really all about. It is not about preserving jobs, its about rewarding failure, keeping the support of the union, and destabilizing the economy so we become more and more dependent on the government in our daily lives. http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-many-tentacles-of-cloward-piven