Review: MIT Shotgun S2 Speaker Cable and IC
Polkitup2
Posts: 1,622
I have had MIT shotgun S2 speaker cables and IC in my system for a few weeks now and finally compared them to my previous AQ Type 8 speaker cable and Viper IC. My system is a Marantz SA-8001 CD player, Musical Fidelity A1 (2008 model) integrated, and Tyler Linbrook Monitors.
I'll cut to the chase, the MITs sound better to my ears with my equipment than the AQ. The most obvious improvements are vocals and bass. Vocals that sounded great with the AQ setup now sound incredible with the MITs. The MITs reveal nuances and inflections in vocals that were recessed with AQ. Tunes like Alan Parsons, I Wouldn't Want To Be Like You", and Jane Monheit's, "I'm Glad There Is You", just sound crazy good - as in real. Also, bass is more prominate and seems to dig deeper with the MITs. Other things I noticed is that notes appear to hang in the air longer and tunes that I used to skip past because they didn't catch my ear now seem worth listening to.
Overall, I would say the MITs offer a fuller more sophisicated sound than the AQs. While I could certainly live with the AQ gear, I think the MITs provide more goodness all around. Also, the MITs did sound noticeably better following a few hundred hours burn in.
I'll cut to the chase, the MITs sound better to my ears with my equipment than the AQ. The most obvious improvements are vocals and bass. Vocals that sounded great with the AQ setup now sound incredible with the MITs. The MITs reveal nuances and inflections in vocals that were recessed with AQ. Tunes like Alan Parsons, I Wouldn't Want To Be Like You", and Jane Monheit's, "I'm Glad There Is You", just sound crazy good - as in real. Also, bass is more prominate and seems to dig deeper with the MITs. Other things I noticed is that notes appear to hang in the air longer and tunes that I used to skip past because they didn't catch my ear now seem worth listening to.
Overall, I would say the MITs offer a fuller more sophisicated sound than the AQs. While I could certainly live with the AQ gear, I think the MITs provide more goodness all around. Also, the MITs did sound noticeably better following a few hundred hours burn in.
Post edited by Polkitup2 on
Comments
-
The MIT cables have a Very Natural sound with good detail and Warmth.
Enjoy:DLinn AV5140 fronts
Linn AV5120 Center
Linn AV5140 Rears
M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
Odyssey Mono-Blocs
SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D -
Excellent!!
I have Shotgun S3's all around. Happy as a camper._________________________________________________
***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***
2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
SOPAThank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman -
-
....tunes that I used to skip past because they didn't catch my ear now seem worth listening to.
Now that is impressive. Turning crummy songs into good songs.Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes
Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables
Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
Three 20 amp circuits. -
excellent, beware the dumb ****, look for the spank marks, a dead give away.
RT1