Excellent read...

steveinaz
steveinaz Posts: 19,536
edited April 2009 in The Clubhouse
Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
Post edited by steveinaz on
«1

Comments

  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited April 2009
    An interesting piece that lays bare some of the Holy Grail quests people are on.

    Here's an issue that's a bit off topic and maybe I'm off the wall. But in addition to 'room effects' which have always driven me CRAZY! I have noticed that, or at least I think I've heard the difference, my system sounds 'different' on different days. And I loosely correlate this with things like humidity and barometric pressure changes? Am I just imagining things or would that 'also' affect what things sound like in your room? Because I swear it sounds different--more dynamic some days than others! IN the same room, same amp, same CD, same speakers?

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,460
    edited April 2009
    Indeed.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • megasat16
    megasat16 Posts: 3,521
    edited April 2009
    Excellent Read! Thanks Steve!
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin:
  • AudioGenics
    AudioGenics Posts: 2,567
    edited April 2009
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,536
    edited April 2009
    cnh wrote: »
    An interesting piece that lays bare some of the Holy Grail quests people are on.

    Here's an issue that's a bit off topic and maybe I'm off the wall. But in addition to 'room effects' which have always driven me CRAZY! I have noticed that, or at least I think I've heard the difference, my system sounds 'different' on different days. And I loosely correlate this with things like humidity and barometric pressure changes? Am I just imagining things or would that 'also' affect what things sound like in your room? Because I swear it sounds different--more dynamic some days than others! IN the same room, same amp, same CD, same speakers?

    cnh

    One theory is heavy use of the "power grid" personally, I don't know...but I think everyone experiences this from time to time.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,536
    edited April 2009
    That article is one of those "are you sure you want to know the truth?" things. Our perception of music is guided only by what we know and/or believe to be accurate. Unless you grew up with a father that was a recording engineer, and had exposure to real music, must of us don't have a clue.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • rayslifecycle
    rayslifecycle Posts: 511
    edited April 2009
    cnh wrote: »
    An interesting piece that lays bare some of the Holy Grail quests people are on.

    Here's an issue that's a bit off topic and maybe I'm off the wall. But in addition to 'room effects' which have always driven me CRAZY! I have noticed that, or at least I think I've heard the difference, my system sounds 'different' on different days. And I loosely correlate this with things like humidity and barometric pressure changes? Am I just imagining things or would that 'also' affect what things sound like in your room? Because I swear it sounds different--more dynamic some days than others! IN the same room, same amp, same CD, same speakers?

    cnh
    steveinaz wrote: »
    One theory is heavy use of the "power grid" personally, I don't know...but I think everyone experiences this from time to time.

    I agree - the best time to listen on the east coast is 5am........that is when the system sounds the best........I am sure it has to do with how little else is happenning at the same time.
  • Disc Jockey
    Disc Jockey Posts: 1,013
    edited April 2009
    Nice read, and very true. I checked to see if my local library had a copy of the "A Meeting by the River" cd he referenced in the article. They do not but ironically enough, Bruce Springsteen's "Born to Run" came back in the search results.
    "The secret of happiness is freedom. The secret of freedom is courage." Thucydides
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited April 2009
    I can't stand The Boss, but "Born to Run" is a mother of a song, and the copy of "Meeting By The River" that I had, I gave away years ago to Bob McG who we haven't heard from in much too long.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited April 2009
    If we have perfect playback then, of course, we need perfect recordigs to play back. One thing that has amused me is as I have acquired better equipment, tuned the room, etc., in various classical pieces I am hearing what sounds like moving chairs, hitting some stand, tripping over something , coughing, etc.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • John30_30
    John30_30 Posts: 1,024
    edited April 2009
    cnh wrote: »
    An interesting piece that lays bare some of the Holy Grail quests people are on.

    Here's an issue that's a bit off topic and maybe I'm off the wall. But in addition to 'room effects' which have always driven me CRAZY! I have noticed that, or at least I think I've heard the difference, my system sounds 'different' on different days. And I loosely correlate this with things like humidity and barometric pressure changes? Am I just imagining things or would that 'also' affect what things sound like in your room? Because I swear it sounds different--more dynamic some days than others! IN the same room, same amp, same CD, same speakers?

    cnh

    Without a doubt. You know, in India, there's whole genres of ragas that have their definite season and time of day to be played, and you're not supposed to break those tonal rules.
    They even have a legend about a famous singer who was commanded by the Emperor to sing a midnight raga at noon. When he finally relented on threat of decapitation, the city went dark.

    Also, I really like that recording he mentions with Ry Cooder and V.M.Bhatt. But only certain times of the day and year, like summer afternoons. ;-)
  • apphd
    apphd Posts: 1,514
    edited April 2009
    Great link Steve, thanks

    cnh I don't think you're hearing things. Power grid, humidity can all have an effect. Look at the number of people that install and run dedicated circuits. The number of people that upgrade power cords. Look at sound in nature, and how it travels through different density objects (solid, water, air) higher humidity = denser air. Also depending on where you live (I'm in the NE) winter/summer has a pretty large swing in humidity. With no air conditioning I can see some changes in the whole house, the wood structure, carpet, drapes, furniture all absorb some of this humidity in the summer and eventually shed it in the winter changing room acoustics. Having an ear and system that shows a big change in sound is something I lack, but I think it makes sense that it is there.
    steveinaz wrote: »
    One theory is heavy use of the "power grid" personally, I don't know...but I think everyone experiences this from time to time.
    cnh wrote: »
    An interesting piece that lays bare some of the Holy Grail quests people are on.

    Here's an issue that's a bit off topic and maybe I'm off the wall. But in addition to 'room effects' which have always driven me CRAZY! I have noticed that, or at least I think I've heard the difference, my system sounds 'different' on different days. And I loosely correlate this with things like humidity and barometric pressure changes? Am I just imagining things or would that 'also' affect what things sound like in your room? Because I swear it sounds different--more dynamic some days than others! IN the same room, same amp, same CD, same speakers?

    cnh
  • markmarc
    markmarc Posts: 2,309
    edited April 2009
    A well-thought out piece. I've met plenty of audio fanatics over the years who live for what the gear does, instead of the music. My ultimate goal is always to be able to get lost in the music.
    Review Site_ (((AudioPursuit)))
    Founder/Publisher Affordable$$Audio 2006-13.
    Former Staff Member TONEAudio
    2 Ch. System
    Amplifiers: Parasound Halo P6 pre, Vista Audio i34, Peachtree amp500, Adcom GFP-565 GFA-535ii, 545ii, 555ii
    Digital: SimAudio HAD230 DAC, iMac 20in/Amarra,
    Speakers: Paradigm Performa F75, Magnepan .7, Totem Model 1's, ACI Emerald XL, Celestion Si Stands. Totem Dreamcatcher sub
    Analog: Technics SL-J2 w/Pickering 3000D, SimAudio LP5.3 phono pre
    Cable/Wires: Cardas, AudioArt, Shunyata Venom 3
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited April 2009
    A writer for Stereophile is just figuring this out? Geez. He should visit the Polk Forum. We could have schooled him on this ages ago.

    I thiink it's crazy for anyone to expect a two-channel stereo system to sound anything like the real thing. Hell, the real thing rarely sounds like it ought to. The most you can hope for is a pleasing sound, regardless of whether it's live or recorded.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,536
    edited April 2009
    Being the audio geeks many of us are, sometimes it's hard to not focus on the equipment. It really should be about the music...
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,536
    edited April 2009
    Early B. wrote: »
    A writer for Stereophile is just figuring this out? Geez. He should visit the Polk Forum. We could have schooled him on this ages ago.

    I thiink it's crazy for anyone to expect a two-channel stereo system to sound anything like the real thing. Hell, the real thing rarely sounds like it ought to. The most you can hope for is a pleasing sound, regardless of whether it's live or recorded.


    I think the points they were trying to convey were; 1) stop over-analyzing your equipment and enjoy the music 2) even the finest top-dollar stuff can't fix a bad recording, so don't get wrapped around the axle trying to fix what will never be right.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • Erik Tracy
    Erik Tracy Posts: 4,673
    edited April 2009
    steveinaz wrote: »
    ... even the finest top-dollar stuff can't fix a bad recording, so don't get wrapped around the axle trying to fix what will never be right.

    So very true....but hard to let go of....

    Some recordings are best relagated to the cassette player in the pickup with the volume cranked and the windows down for best sentimental enjoyment. :D

    H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music.
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited April 2009
    Hello! I've been saying this since I got here!:D
    Early B. wrote: »
    A writer for Stereophile is just figuring this out? Geez. He should visit the Polk Forum. We could have schooled him on this ages ago.

    I thiink it's crazy for anyone to expect a two-channel stereo system to sound anything like the real thing. Hell, the real thing rarely sounds like it ought to. The most you can hope for is a pleasing sound, regardless of whether it's live or recorded.
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • Hillbilly61
    Hillbilly61 Posts: 702
    edited April 2009
    markmarc wrote: »
    A well-thought out piece. I've met plenty of audio fanatics over the years who live for what the gear does, instead of the music. My ultimate goal is always to be able to get lost in the music.

    I think that article was a very good reminder that, ultimately, the music/sounds we get from our systems is limited by the source material. I am largely in the camp that it's all about the sound. With that comes the interest in the gear, as in general, the better the gear is the more like the sound reproduction is better. So, I look at stuff better than what I have, read reviews and, occasionally, buy something.

    Topic wise, I think that is where things diverge, as we are all hostage to the gear we use ... hence the passion concerning the gear and coloration that experience & opinions bring to the table. Are there gear fanatics out there? Sure, plenty. That's their gig and good for them. This is really no different than any other interest ... motoring, computing, home improvement, etc. To me, such folks represent a great wealth of knowlege, admiration for having more or less mastered a topic and, occasionally, someone I pity.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited April 2009
    steveinaz wrote: »
    That article is one of those "are you sure you want to know the truth?" things. Our perception of music is guided only by what we know and/or believe to be accurate. Unless you grew up with a father that was a recording engineer, and had exposure to real music, must of us don't have a clue.

    Yep. Most people that claim a live recording of a sax, or another instrument sounds way too harsh haven't heard the bite of some of this music has up close and personal. I have a Sonny Rollins recording (under the bridge), and it is one of my favorite pieces to sit back and relax to. Most people don't like the near true sound it produces. The stuff that a lot of people listen to has been smoothed over to be more pleasing to the ear. Lightman and I go back and forth discussing on this topic again and again(we are on the same page;)). I am at the point of chasing good recordings. You can't put together a stereo that will reproduce the sound of the artists true sound on many albums. Too much mixing, and trying to smooth things over to please the masses, or compression to get it to play loud without the peaks that would distort systems not capable of handling the transients, and dynamics of "true" sound.
    Zero wrote: »
    You know, to an extent, I feel that the popular ‘it’s not about the gear’ statement is hogwash. In fact, I’ll submit that the reverse is true. Just as it’s ‘all about the music’, it’s also ‘all about the gear’.

    ....

    So don’t be afraid of loving the gear that makes the music you enjoy sound even better. That’s what it’s there for. For me, discovering new music that touches the soul is nearly as enjoyable as discovering new electronics that do the same thing. Both music and gear form a symbiotic relationship to one another, and I enjoy discovering the many different interpretations of these artists and how they influence my overall experience.

    Yep:)
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • danz1906
    danz1906 Posts: 5,144
    edited April 2009
    Listen to music, not your hi-fi.—Steve Guttenberg

    Now that advice we can all live by.;)
    Linn AV5140 fronts
    Linn AV5120 Center
    Linn AV5140 Rears
    M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
    Odyssey Mono-Blocs
    SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D
  • Fongolio
    Fongolio Posts: 3,516
    edited April 2009
    It's about the sum of all the parts. Just like crappy room acoustics can make the best gear sound average, so can a crappy recording. So what's one to do? Well, my home music setup is really quite good at getting me to those wow places with good recordings. On the other hand I have a really loud big thump but pretty good sound quality system in my '89 IROC-Z. What it does well is loud and thumpy while driving on the highway. There is so much other noise happening like wind and road and engine that superb sound quality is lost anyway so loud and thumpy with minimal distortion is all that's left. That's where Born to Run gets played. And anything that sounds great really loud.
    SDA-1C (full mods)
    Carver TFM-55
    NAD 1130 Pre-amp
    Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
    The Clamp
    Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
    Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
    Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
    Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
    Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
    ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
    Ben's IC's
    Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM
  • ND13
    ND13 Posts: 7,601
    edited April 2009
    Does anyone, besides Guttenberg, actually use ANYTHING from Springsteen for reference material? There are only like two songs I don't immediately switch the tuner on when I hear them.

    Great article other than "The Boss" having to be mentioned.

    Pee Wee Herman, from "Cheech and Chong's Nice Dreams", got it right. You know what's wrong with today's rock and roll....Bruce Springsteen's **** it all up.
    "SOME PEOPLE CALL ME MAURICE,
    CAUSE I SPEAK OF THE POMPITIOUS OF LOVE"
  • Erik Tracy
    Erik Tracy Posts: 4,673
    edited April 2009
    ND13 wrote: »
    Does anyone, besides Guttenberg, actually use ANYTHING from Springsteen for reference material? There are only like two songs I don't immediately switch the tuner on when I hear them.

    Great article other than "The Boss" having to be mentioned.

    Pee Wee Herman, from "Cheech and Chong's Nice Dreams", got it right. You know what's wrong with today's rock and roll....Bruce Springsteen's **** it all up.

    I suppose it might be different if I could understand what it is he mumbles about....;)

    H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music.
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited April 2009
    markmarc wrote: »
    A well-thought out piece. I've met plenty of audio fanatics over the years who live for what the gear does, instead of the music. My ultimate goal is always to be able to get lost in the music.

    Thaks Mark.
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited April 2009
    Early B. wrote: »
    I thiink it's crazy for anyone to expect a two-channel stereo system to sound anything like the real thing. .
    Tom? Your thoughts.
    Nailed it, Brad.
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited April 2009
    Zero wrote: »
    You know, to an extent, I feel that the popular ‘it’s not about the gear’ statement is hogwash. In fact, I’ll submit that the reverse is true. Just as it’s ‘all about the music’, it’s also ‘all about the gear’.

    Think about it for a moment. The whole reason hi-fi exists is to maximize the musical experience through extracting the most performance from a given playback medium, which most commonly is either vinyl or compact disc. Before most of us ever welcomed an expensive audio component into our lives, or even thought about such a thing, we all enjoyed music from a variety of low quality sources. If it were just ‘all about the music’, we would still be happily listening to our table-top radios as we roam about the home. If it were simply ‘all about the music’ and never ‘about the gear’, then there would be no Club Polk. Hi-Fi wouldn’t exist. Thankfully, art/music is a necessity component to a human life and we are charged with the drive to further develop and perfect it. Subsequently, at some point in time, each and every person here encountered an experience which inspired you to pursue your passion for music further. In the end, that’s what hi-fi is all about. It is a means which allows the listener (you) to take your existing passion for music and elevate it to another emotional and intellectual level.

    So don’t be afraid of loving the gear that makes the music you enjoy sound even better. That’s what it’s there for. For me, discovering new music that touches the soul is nearly as enjoyable as discovering new electronics that do the same thing. Both music and gear form a symbiotic relationship to one another, and I enjoy discovering the many different interpretations of these artists and how they influence my overall experience.

    I cried, from happiness.
    Gear to music. Music to gear.
    Thanks Zero.
    Lightman
  • Jstas
    Jstas Posts: 14,806
    edited April 2009
    Zero wrote: »
    You know, to an extent, I feel that the popular ‘it’s not about the gear’ statement is hogwash. In fact, I’ll submit that the reverse is true. Just as it’s ‘all about the music’, it’s also ‘all about the gear’.

    Think about it for a moment. The whole reason hi-fi exists is to maximize the musical experience through extracting the most performance from a given playback medium, which most commonly is either vinyl or compact disc. Before most of us ever welcomed an expensive audio component into our lives, or even thought about such a thing, we all enjoyed music from a variety of low quality sources. If it were just ‘all about the music’, we would still be happily listening to our table-top radios as we roam about the home. If it were simply ‘all about the music’ and never ‘about the gear’, then there would be no Club Polk. Hi-Fi wouldn’t exist. Thankfully, art/music is a necessity component to a human life and we are charged with the drive to further develop and perfect it. Subsequently, at some point in time, each and every person here encountered an experience which inspired you to pursue your passion for music further. In the end, that’s what hi-fi is all about. It is a means which allows the listener (you) to take your existing passion for music and elevate it to another emotional and intellectual level.

    So don’t be afraid of loving the gear that makes the music you enjoy sound even better. That’s what it’s there for. For me, discovering new music that touches the soul is nearly as enjoyable as discovering new electronics that do the same thing. Both music and gear form a symbiotic relationship to one another, and I enjoy discovering the many different interpretations of these artists and how they influence my overall experience.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're just jealous because my speakers are bigger than yours and I have more KLH speakers than lightman could angrily brandish a stick at. :eek: :p;):D
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited April 2009
    Jstas wrote: »
    Yeah, yeah, yeah. You're just jealous because my speakers are bigger than yours and I have more KLH speakers than lightman could angrily brandish a stick at. :eek: :p;):D

    WHAT?!! This won't do! Where's my stick?
  • Hawkeye
    Hawkeye Posts: 1,313
    edited April 2009
    I have attempted to create a system that is pleasing to my ear in my house. Is it like the real thing? Close but no cigar and I can accept the limitations of both the home and live performance.

    There is a small club here that has jazz quartets on the weekend. Poor acoustics, pots, pans, glasses clinking and conversations all going on at the same time and it is great time. The ambience, the emotion of the players which you can actually see and not have to imagine when home all add to the experience of music.

    It has been raining here in MD for 3.5 days now and my gear sounds like crap. The dehumidifier has been going non stop, my ears are clogged and there is road repair going on in front of the house! So enviromental factors play a large part in how anything is going to operate.

    I'm looking forward to 12/2012 when everything is in alignment! I might either blow the panels off my speakers or they will disappear (figuratively) which only happens on rare ocassions!

    Gordon
    2 Channel -
    Martin Logan Spire, 2 JL Audio F112 subs
    McIntosh C1000 Controller with Tube pre amp, 2 MC501 amplifiers, MD1K Transport & DAC, MR-88 Tuner
    WireWorld Eclipse 6.0 speaker wire and jumpers, Eclipse 5^2 Squared Balanced IC's. Silver Eclipse PCs (5)
    Symposium Rollerblocks 2+ (16)Black Diamond Racing Mk 3 pits (8)