is xm radio SQ better when using your receiver

bevo
bevo Posts: 306
edited March 2009 in 2 Channel Audio
I just got xm and it sounds really compressed using just my xm express, through the home dock station. I have it hooked up with stereo rca cables. Does it sound better if you actually use your receivers xm ready option, and use the other type of cable connection?

I'm not even sure what type of cable it is, but the back of my receiver has what looks like a tiny ethernet, or optical in when using the xm ready feature on the receiver.

Any help would be great. I only got xm because of my new job. It involves setting inside a machine, and pretty much listening to the radio all day. After seeing the music selection xm offers, I would like to integrate it into my home setup, but it sounds almost to bad to tolerate the way it is now. It sounds fine with my little speakers at work, but my home system really makes it sound bad.
Denon 1909, want to upgrade for pre outs
Fronts-polk RTi A5
center-polk CSi A4
Sides Polk FXi A6
rears- polk rm8's
sub-SVS pb-13 ultra
Blue ray-ps3
Panasonic plasma 50 inch
Buttkicker(don't use or need it anymore since getting the Ultra)
Post edited by bevo on

Comments

  • comfortablycurt
    comfortablycurt Posts: 6,745
    edited March 2009
    Try it out and let us know.:)
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Marantz UD5005 universal player
    Parasound Halo P5 preamp
    Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
    PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited March 2009
    My understanding is satellite radio is compressed, like MP3. While it might sound better through a decent receiver versus a cheapo, it still will be compressed music.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • Gadabout
    Gadabout Posts: 1,072
    edited March 2009
    Xm Ready stuff will sound better, than your XM Xpress. Right now your using analog outs. To take advantage of your Receivers processing abilities, it needs a digital source.

    To take advantage of the XM Ready Option, you will need an XM Mini Tuner Dock and a Mini-Tuner. You won't need another antenna if you already have one.

    The down side to this is that the Mini Tuner is another radio on your account and will be $6.99/mo extra.

    If you really like XM you could also get the POLK XrT12 and hook it up. Makes a difference in my opinion.

    Hope that helps,
    Scott
    Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid. ..... Frank Zappa
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited March 2009
    It's quality is pretty disappointing. I have had XM for quite some time, and now I have it w/Direct TV--it's still not my source of choice. Flat, dull, dimensionless comes to mind. The content is very cool, I still keep my Delphi/boombox setup activated for camping trips, etc.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • adam2434
    adam2434 Posts: 995
    edited March 2009
    Got a free XM subscription when I bought a new car earlier this year.

    It sounds like **** IMO due to the very low bitrates they use (30-50 kbps IIRC). I can hear all kinds of compression artifacts in my stock car stereo.

    For non-critical listening in a car or portable situation, my experience is that you need at least 192 kbps to avoid distracting compression artifacts. XM's bitrate isn't anywhere near high enough to deliver decent sound IMO.

    This is a garbage in, garbage out scenario, so I don't think any hardware or connection changes will make things much better. XM is definitely a quantity over quality thing.

    I don't use them very often, but the sound quality from my cable TV's music channels is vastly superior to XM. I believe the cable music channels are around 192 kbps using AC-3 (Dolby Digital) compression.
    5.1 and 2.0 ch Basement Media Room: Outlaw 975/Emotiva DC-1/Rotel RB-1582 MKII/Rotel RB-1552/Audiosource Amp 3/Polk LS90, CS400i, FX500i/Outlaw X-12, LFM-1/JVD DLA-HD250/Da-Lite 100" HCCV/Sony ES BDP/Sonos Connect. DC-1/RB-1582 MKII/Sonos Connect also feed Polk 7C in garage or Dayton IO655 on patio.
    2.1 ch Basement Gym: Denon AVR-2807/Klipsch Forte I or NHT SB2/JBL SUB 550P x 2/Chromecast Audio.
    2.0 ch Living Room: Rotel RX-1052/Emotiva DC-1/Klipsch RF-7 III/Sony ES BDP/LG 65" LED.
    2.0 ch Semi-portable: Klipsch Powergate/NHT SB3/Chromecast Audio.
    Kitchen: Sonos Play5.
  • bevo
    bevo Posts: 306
    edited March 2009
    Thanks everyone. I was afraid that this was the case. The content is great though, so I think i'll keep it for work, and just use it for the talk radio.
    Denon 1909, want to upgrade for pre outs
    Fronts-polk RTi A5
    center-polk CSi A4
    Sides Polk FXi A6
    rears- polk rm8's
    sub-SVS pb-13 ultra
    Blue ray-ps3
    Panasonic plasma 50 inch
    Buttkicker(don't use or need it anymore since getting the Ultra)