Bi-amp vs. subwoofer ??

wehavtwins
wehavtwins Posts: 4
edited February 2009 in 2 Channel Audio
I need some advice... I have a pair of Polk LSi9s - which I love (in fact, they are the sixth pair of Polk speakers I've owned). They are hooked up to a NAD C372 amp w/ an Arcam CD192 CD player and a Dual CS5000 turntable. I love the sound of my system, but would like to "enhance" it if I could. I am wondering what would be better: bi-amping the speakers or should I invest in a subwoofer. I've been getting alot of conflicting advice as to which is better... help!!!!
Post edited by wehavtwins on

Comments

  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited February 2009
    Sub will add another dimension and be more noticable.I would use a different amp though,but hey,if it works for ya.What amps are you considering to bi-amp with ?
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,068
    edited February 2009
    Without a doubt, adding a quality sub will give you the best option & overall performance. The 9's are great on their own but will excel with the addition of a good sub. Comparing bi-amping to a sub is like comparing apples to oranges.
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • TECHNOKID
    TECHNOKID Posts: 4,298
    edited February 2009
    Bi-amping can worsen speakers performance if not done properly. Here some interesting reading when one is serious about proper calibration of such

    http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm

    However, this is something that can be done without extensive cost providing you already own a suitable amplifier to do the task. You try and if you like the set-up stays! If you do not like, you go back to your previous set-up. If you are looking at bass enhancement, it should easier to simply add a good subwoofer to your set-up.
    Comparing bi-amping to a sub is like comparing apples to oranges.
    +1

    Cheers :)
    DARE TO SOAR:
    “Your attitude, almost always determine your altitude in life” ;)
  • TheMARPATNinja7
    TheMARPATNinja7 Posts: 150
    edited February 2009
    He's right, bi-amping will pretty much just make things a little louder and adding a sub will totally transform your listening experience. For a bassaholic like me, I can't believe that some people don't have subs. Forget the economic stimulus package, "The Basstimulus Package: A Car in Every Garage and a JL Gotham in Every Living Room."
  • comfortablycurt
    comfortablycurt Posts: 6,745
    edited February 2009
    Go for the sub...hands down. That's going to give you a much more noticeable improvement.
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Marantz UD5005 universal player
    Parasound Halo P5 preamp
    Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
    PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's
  • Spike111
    Spike111 Posts: 15
    edited February 2009
    Wehavtwins, get a sub. Mine blends in nicely with my LSi 9's. Gives them that extra low end punch, but I will say the LSi 9's have pretty good bass even thought they are a bookshelf size speaker.
    AVR: Marantz 7008
    AMP: Emotiva XPA-5
    Mains: LSi 15
    Center: LSiC
    Side Surronds: LSi 9
    Rear Surronds: LSi 7
    Sub: eD A2-300
    Bluray: PS3
    Turntable: Rega P2
  • lumpy
    lumpy Posts: 113
    edited February 2009
    I am no guru, but I think that a sub would be the first choice.

    if you want more staccato / tighter punch, or you want more detail at lower volumes - go with a matching amp to drive the lower end of the Lsi9's.

    If you want fill that full sonic range down to 20hz the sub is the ticket. A powered sub would take a bit of the load off the amp that you currnetly have, and give you some of the same results as another amp.

    Having said that - I have matching amps and a sub with my 9's. if I had to choose between which to take away (never), I would probably loose the sub.
    pop

    media room: Lsi25 mains driven by an audiosource amp300, LSi9's driven by another amp300, LsiC drivin by an audiosourcAmp200, Lsi7 rear channels driven by receiver - Yamaha 863, Panamax 5300, epson 6100 w/ 106" elite cinatension2 screen, HPz555 media center, oppo 980, techniques SLbd3 turntable,xbox and ps3,

    living room: VM30 mains driven by a niles 2125, VM20 center and VM10 surrounds, velodyne dsp10, yamaha rxv661, cambridge audio dvd89, panamax5300, philips 42" plasma
  • Mike21
    Mike21 Posts: 252
    edited February 2009
    Go for the sub for all the reasons already posted.

    What is your budget?
    ____________________________________________
    Home Theater 32"LG LCD; Comcast; 7.1 Onkyo 805; Fronts: Polk M50s; Center: Polk CS2; Sides: Polk M40s; Rear: B&W LM1s; Subs: (2) Sony 12" x 100w; Samsung 1500BDP; Toshiba A-2 HD-DVDP.
    PC stereo: Viper custom PC: Windows XP; ASIO4ALL; JRiver Jukebox> Pop Pulse USB to S/PDIF conv> Monarchy DIP > Musiland MD10 DAC > Parasound 2100 pre> Aragon 4004 MKII amp> Dali Ikon6 towers; Sunfire True Sub; PSA Duet, Ultimate outlet and Noise Harvestors.
  • Bass_Pedal
    Bass_Pedal Posts: 196
    edited February 2009
    I am going to do just what you are discussing, this week. I've been using a pair of 9's for about a year now. I've done the bi-amp thing a few times with a couple of different amps and hand varying degrees of success. Recently I tried bi-amping my Musical Fidelity A3cr on the highs and an Adcom GFA 555 on the lows and found it was harsh compared to the A3cr powering them alone. I suspect, because of the harsh nature of the Adcom amp. Unless I'm mistaken, when bi-amping the lsi9's the two woofers are powered by the amp designated to the low frequencies and only the tweeter is powered by the higher frequency amp. The vast majority of the work would then be done by the lower frequency amp, so if you have an amp that you like I would just use it to power the whole speaker. As for a sub, I haven't been using one but I am picking up an HSU VTF 3 mk 3 this week. From everything I have read it should make quite a bit of difference. I think going this way will be your best bet.
    Mains - Vienna Acoustics Mozart Grand
    Subs - Rel T5 x 2
    Amplification - Bryston 3b cubed
    Pre Amp - Marantz Sc11-1
    SACD - Marantz Sa11-1
    Stream - Cambridge Audio CXN v2
    Dac - Marantz Dac-1
    TT - Pro-Ject RPM 9.1 w/ Ortofon 2M Black Cartidge
    Phono Stage - Project Tube box DS
  • wehavtwins
    wehavtwins Posts: 4
    edited February 2009
    It sure sounds like the sub is the way to go... I'm thinking of the DSW MicroPro 2000 - sticking with Polk. Price isn't a big concern - since the matching amp to my NAD C372 costs the same as the DSW sub.

    I've got quite a history with this maker... My first pair of Polks was the Model 7s. Went to the '10s a year later, followed by the RAT12s then the SDA2s. Now I have the Lsi9s - to make the speakers seem less overwhelming in my listening room. Many of my friends are serious jazz musicians and they are always impressed with the sound of the 9s. I can just imagine what the 15s and 25s sound like...

    Many thanks to all who responded. I'm relatively new to forums n' such, but it's sure fun!

    Cheers,:)
  • organ
    organ Posts: 4,969
    edited February 2009
    I'd have to say, go for the subwoofer. Get a high quality one for the LSi9. I have a pair and a sub can really enhance the sound.

    Don't bi-amp unless you know the gain on both amps are identical.