This started out as a PM to Ben . . .

SolidSqual
SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
edited February 2009 in 2 Channel Audio
Hey Ben,

Got the cables today. Interestingly with the addition of your cables my noise floor dropped further (which was to be expected) but my preamplifier gain seemed to have increased. Listening to bands like Tool I rocked it out at 65-70 according to the dial on my preamp. Now, 50 is frickin loud as ****. This is awesome. I have so much more headroom. I wonder if this is a result of the BAT design. Have you heard of this before?

Mike
Post edited by SolidSqual on

Comments

  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2009
    Very cool.

    SS -- what brand of cables did you replace?
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited February 2009
    Early B. wrote: »
    Very cool.

    SS -- what brand of cables did you replace?

    The one's by Frank Dai, the other great guy who services tons of Polkies here with excellent service and lightning fast turnaround.

    Part of the reason my noise floor dropped noticeably is the switch from RCA/XLR to complete balanced.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited February 2009
    Tonight my friend Jerry was over and we were listening to his custom SDA's. We hooked up the Denon 2900 SACD player to check it out. The SDA effect was totally gone. I had some spare AR IC's there just to hook it up. At first we thought the Speakers were messed up with something wired wrong. We swapped in my IC's and it was back. Also I have the option of running my DAC at 2vrms out, or 4.5vrms. With my cables, and the DAC's voltage set high the SDA effect was in full effect.
    Ben
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited February 2009
    I knew all that torched skin and plasma would make these cables sing. So what the hell is the big secret? Any idea why the cables had the effect they did? I've been A and Bing back and forth because my CDP does has both Single Ended and Balanced outputs and the volume is definitely way less with the Signal RCAs.
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited February 2009
    SolidSqual wrote: »
    I knew all that torched skin and plasma would make these cables sing. So what the hell is the big secret? Any idea why the cables had the effect they did?

    Still scratching my head. I have the Demo MIT's here for a couple more days. I want to see how they effect the SDA's.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • ShinAce
    ShinAce Posts: 1,194
    edited February 2009
    If you're switching between unbalanced to balanced outputs at the same output voltage(same level), there's your answer. That's a 3dB voltage gain on the balanced, or 6dB power wise. It will sound roughly twice as loud.

    There's no headroom gain. You're just running the amp harder in balanced.
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,411
    edited February 2009
    ShinAce wrote: »
    If you're switching between unbalanced to balanced outputs at the same output voltage(same level), there's your answer. That's a 3dB voltage gain on the balanced, or 6dB power wise. It will sound roughly twice as loud.

    There's no headroom gain. You're just running the amp harder in balanced.

    my guess also
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited February 2009
    ShinAce wrote: »
    If you're switching between unbalanced to balanced outputs at the same output voltage(same level), there's your answer. That's a 3dB voltage gain on the balanced, or 6dB power wise. It will sound roughly twice as loud.

    There's no headroom gain. You're just running the amp harder in balanced.

    Ahh makes total sense. I forgot about that change. Thanks!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,171
    edited February 2009
    ShinAce wrote: »
    If you're switching between unbalanced to balanced outputs at the same output voltage(same level), there's your answer. That's a 3dB voltage gain on the balanced, or 6dB power wise. It will sound roughly twice as loud.

    There's no headroom gain. You're just running the amp harder in balanced.

    Yep, most differential balanced amps have (2) different input impedance's for RCA and XLR connections. You need to compare apples to apples to get the correct info to your question.

    Now if the XLR connection is just bridged and not truly balanced the input impedance might be the same or close for both inputs.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited February 2009
    I believe someone said.

    Balanced trumps unbalanced.

    The BAT has a high input impedance, off the top 90-100 K, as you move along the path a stop with a BAT amp and pre would likely be a comfortable place to be.

    RT1
  • billbillw
    billbillw Posts: 6,769
    edited February 2009
    Its pretty common for the balanced circuits to have more overall gain than the single ended. I found the same thing with my Parasound setup. Its not really more headroom. Just more gain. Like Shin Ace said, you're just pushing the amp harder. With my Parasound gear, I ended up having to use the single ended because the balanced had too much gain and it gave me very little range of volume control.
    For rig details, see my profile. Nothing here anymore...