Quick amp question

cdn5003
Posts: 144
If I were to add a two channel amp to my setup for my mains (A3's) would the receiver provide more power to the center and rear speakers?
I am thinking of picking up an adcom 535 or 545 to try out. I don't know if this is a good decision or not.
I am thinking of picking up an adcom 535 or 545 to try out. I don't know if this is a good decision or not.
HT Setup: Onkyo 706; Rotel RB-1075; Rti A3; Csi A6; Fxi3's
2 CH: Squeezebox Touch; Dared SL-2000a; GoldenEar Triton 5 or Lsi9's; Parasound 2125; SVS SB12-NSD; Music Hall DAC 25.2
2 CH: Squeezebox Touch; Dared SL-2000a; GoldenEar Triton 5 or Lsi9's; Parasound 2125; SVS SB12-NSD; Music Hall DAC 25.2
Post edited by cdn5003 on
Comments
-
double post; sorryShawn
AVR: Marantz SR-5011
Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
Front: Polk LsiM703
Rear: LSI fx
Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
DVD Player: Sony PS4 -
no, avr's rate watts per channel. if you use an amp for the front two channels, it will not redistribute those watts to another channel. but, most will agree that any time you use external amplification, it is better.Shawn
AVR: Marantz SR-5011
Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
Front: Polk LsiM703
Rear: LSI fx
Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
DVD Player: Sony PS4 -
In your case you would likely hear an improvement the Oinker shares its power amongst the channels, their specs are wattage for 1 channel driven if I recall so less channels driven will leave more power for the others, its important to know that if the receiver is rated lets say for 100 watts per channel it cannot really provide that power if all channels were to tried to be driven with 100 watts at once. In fact some receiver companies readily disclose a wattage difference between using two channels or four or five at the same time.
RT1 -
If I were to add a two channel amp to my setup for my mains (A3's) would the receiver provide more power to the center and rear speakers?
I am thinking of picking up an adcom 535 or 545 to try out. I don't know if this is a good decision or not.
Well, yes and no. No - your avr wouldn't have any more power. But yes - what power it does have would now be available for just those 3 speakers, rather than 5. In other words, it would have an easier load to carry. It would be able to drive those 3 speakers far more efficiently, with improved headroom. A dedicated amp for the mains is, generally, a very good idea. Do it! -
Even if your AVR does not provide more power, it is still worth driving your mains with a more powerful external AMP. My Carver TFM-45 was step up over the TFM-25 which was a step over my Denon AVR.Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs -
It is not a one-for-one tradeoff. However, FOR A GIVEN LEVEL OF DISTORTION, an AVR will typically be able to supply more power to fewer channels. That is why "objective" professional reviewers will test a receiver for different numbers of channels driven. And that is also why many manufacturers "cheat" by giving power ratings based on only two channels driven.MAIN: Polk Lsi9s; Polk PSW505; Lsic (in box); Onkyo SR-875; Parasound 2250; Cambridge Audio 740C; LG BD370
OFFICE: Polk Lsi7; REL T3; HK 3490; CA 840W; Onkyo C-S5VL
BENCHED: CS20; OWM3s