Quick amp question

cdn5003
cdn5003 Posts: 144
edited February 2009 in Electronics
If I were to add a two channel amp to my setup for my mains (A3's) would the receiver provide more power to the center and rear speakers?

I am thinking of picking up an adcom 535 or 545 to try out. I don't know if this is a good decision or not.
HT Setup: Onkyo 706; Rotel RB-1075; Rti A3; Csi A6; Fxi3's

2 CH: Squeezebox Touch; Dared SL-2000a; GoldenEar Triton 5 or Lsi9's; Parasound 2125; SVS SB12-NSD; Music Hall DAC 25.2
Post edited by cdn5003 on

Comments

  • shawn474
    shawn474 Posts: 3,052
    edited February 2009
    double post; sorry
    Shawn
    AVR: Marantz SR-5011
    Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
    Front: Polk LsiM703
    Rear: LSI fx
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
    Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
    DVD Player: Sony PS4
  • shawn474
    shawn474 Posts: 3,052
    edited February 2009
    no, avr's rate watts per channel. if you use an amp for the front two channels, it will not redistribute those watts to another channel. but, most will agree that any time you use external amplification, it is better.
    Shawn
    AVR: Marantz SR-5011
    Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
    Front: Polk LsiM703
    Rear: LSI fx
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
    Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
    DVD Player: Sony PS4
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited February 2009
    In your case you would likely hear an improvement the Oinker shares its power amongst the channels, their specs are wattage for 1 channel driven if I recall so less channels driven will leave more power for the others, its important to know that if the receiver is rated lets say for 100 watts per channel it cannot really provide that power if all channels were to tried to be driven with 100 watts at once. In fact some receiver companies readily disclose a wattage difference between using two channels or four or five at the same time.

    RT1
  • ddkane
    ddkane Posts: 8
    edited February 2009
    cdn5003 wrote: »
    If I were to add a two channel amp to my setup for my mains (A3's) would the receiver provide more power to the center and rear speakers?

    I am thinking of picking up an adcom 535 or 545 to try out. I don't know if this is a good decision or not.

    Well, yes and no. No - your avr wouldn't have any more power. But yes - what power it does have would now be available for just those 3 speakers, rather than 5. In other words, it would have an easier load to carry. It would be able to drive those 3 speakers far more efficiently, with improved headroom. A dedicated amp for the mains is, generally, a very good idea. Do it!
  • thsmith
    thsmith Posts: 6,082
    edited February 2009
    Even if your AVR does not provide more power, it is still worth driving your mains with a more powerful external AMP. My Carver TFM-45 was step up over the TFM-25 which was a step over my Denon AVR.
    Speakers: SDA-1C (most all the goodies)
    Preamp: Joule Electra LA-150 MKII SE
    Amp: Wright WPA 50-50 EAT KT88s
    Analog: Marantz TT-15S1 MBS Glider SL| Wright WPP100C Amperex BB 6er5 and 7316 & WPM-100 SUT
    Digital: Mac mini 2.3GHz dual-core i5 8g RAM 1.5 TB HDD Music Server Amarra (memory play) - USB - W4S DAC 2
    Cables: Mits S3 IC and Spk cables| PS Audio PCs
  • NewHTguy
    NewHTguy Posts: 584
    edited February 2009
    It is not a one-for-one tradeoff. However, FOR A GIVEN LEVEL OF DISTORTION, an AVR will typically be able to supply more power to fewer channels. That is why "objective" professional reviewers will test a receiver for different numbers of channels driven. And that is also why many manufacturers "cheat" by giving power ratings based on only two channels driven.
    MAIN: Polk Lsi9s; Polk PSW505; Lsic (in box); Onkyo SR-875; Parasound 2250; Cambridge Audio 740C; LG BD370
    OFFICE: Polk Lsi7; REL T3; HK 3490; CA 840W; Onkyo C-S5VL
    BENCHED: CS20; OWM3s