Original Soundtrack versus Remastered

glenm16
glenm16 Posts: 10
edited October 2008 in Music & Movies
Guys which one sound better the original soundtrack or the remastered. Im planning to purchase U2/ Joshua Tree and there are several versions. I need your input on this before making a purchase. Thanks
Post edited by glenm16 on

Comments

  • Fongolio
    Fongolio Posts: 3,516
    edited October 2008
    CD or LP? I have the 180 gram 2 LP remastered and the sound is excellent. I don't have an original LP to compare so I can only vouch for the version I have.
    SDA-1C (full mods)
    Carver TFM-55
    NAD 1130 Pre-amp
    Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
    The Clamp
    Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
    Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
    Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
    Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
    Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
    ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
    Ben's IC's
    Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM
  • blakeh
    blakeh Posts: 491
    edited October 2008
    Check out the reviews of the the "remastered" versions on Amazon. The general consensus is even though the music is good, the remastering is one of the worst examples of brick walling ever perpetrated.

    I can't find the site at the moment, but someone posted .WAV graphs comparing the original album and the remaster. The remaster looked terrible.

    My advice is to listen to it for yourself before you invest in the remastered version.
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited October 2008
    I always will go for a remastered version over an original. So many originals were done poorly that they sound crappy. But it's a crap shoot either way. Good luck.
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2