Name That Lyric Game

124»

Comments

  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,840
    edited July 2008
    If by "game" you mean ...... oh, nevermind. What's the use. :(
    Sal Palooza
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    You get what you pay for. I copied them straight from the internet. If that bothers you then I can't help you.

    Have a good day. I know I am :D

    REALLY? How about linking up those sites?

    You can't.

    And, F the "have a nice day" crap, Carl. All you are trying to do is piss people off. Only a moron does that constantly. I know you are not a moron, please stop acting like one.

    Take the challange(s) Carl. Link the sites and stop trying to antagonize people.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • candyliquor35m
    candyliquor35m Posts: 2,267
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    REALLY?

    There's nothing I can say that will satisfy you or make you happy. If you can't handle someone copying and pasting some lyrics that don't meet your expectations, I can't help you. If you can't handle someone telling you to have a nice day, I can't help you.

    Have a nice day! I know I am!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    There's nothing I can say that will satisfy you or make you happy. If you can't handle someone copying and pasting some lyrics that don't meet your expectations, I can't help you. If you can't handle someone telling you to have a nice day, I can't help you.

    Have a nice day! I know I am!

    I didn't ask you to SAY anything. I asked you to prove you aren't lying by linking the site you supposedly cut-n-pasted from. I would think you would want to do that since your integrity is called into question almost every time you post.

    You are full of ****, dishonest, and just an antagonist. I have met you and thought you were alright. I was wrong.

    You forgot the stupid smiley face when you claimed you are having a nice day. Are you lying, again?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • candyliquor35m
    candyliquor35m Posts: 2,267
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    I

    If my lyrics being off by a couple of words bothers you this much then I can't help you. You still guessed cheap trick. End of story but you won't let it die. If you want to discuss this further then please pm me or stop by and listen to some polks which can do wonders for stress.

    Sade is sounding quite nice right now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,735
    edited July 2008
    Wow, caught in yet another lie.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."

    President of Club Polk

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • george daniel
    george daniel Posts: 12,096
    edited July 2008
    I am compelled to say (and I really don't know why,but) "I don't believe they knew that I was Long John Silver";)
    JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Demiurge
    Demiurge Posts: 10,874
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    If my lyrics being off by a couple of words bothers you this much then I can't help you. You still guessed cheap trick. End of story but you won't let it die. If you want to discuss this further then please pm me or stop by and listen to some polks which can do wonders for stress.

    Sade is sounding quite nice right now.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SIoTNyHGqBM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SIoTNyHGqBM&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    If my lyrics being off by a couple of words bothers you this much then I can't help you. You still guessed cheap trick. End of story but you won't let it die. If you want to discuss this further then please pm me or stop by and listen to some polks which can do wonders for stress.

    Sade is sounding quite nice right now.

    A) I didn't guess the lyric, someone else did. You started a thread and have posted several inaccurate lyrics. You still "claim" that no one has answered the "don't ask me no" lyric correctly. That is BS - you are just trying to stir things up.

    B) You flat out lied about cutting and pasting the Cheap Trick song from a web site. Even my 14 year-old can tell you the lyrics to that one. The dude is talking about his mother and father, not "your mother and father". To even cut-n-paste that would be plain stupid. Don't start a thread and then add to it with crap that no one can or should come up with an answer to.

    C) I am not asking you to "help me". I am just asking you to be truthful and cut out the ****. You continually resort to the "I can't help you" line when you are backed into a corner revealing your dishonesty.

    D) I have 9 sets of Polks, I don't need to hear your **** up tweaters to know they sound like ****.

    Once again, A$$hole, post the site you copied it from, or just go away.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    Demiurge wrote: »
    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SIoTNyHGqBM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SIoTNyHGqBM&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


    Oh my God! Laughing my **** off! Where do you get this stuff?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    F1nut wrote: »
    Wow, caught in yet another lie.


    +1
    +2
    +3
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,196
    edited July 2008
    Never mind. Post edited.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Demiurge
    Demiurge Posts: 10,874
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    If

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1jsPVu7o51A&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1jsPVu7o51A&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    A) I didn't guess the lyric, someone else did. You started a thread and have posted several inaccurate lyrics. You still "claim" that no one has answered the "don't ask me no" lyric correctly. That is BS - you are just trying to stir things up.

    B) You flat out lied about cutting and pasting the Cheap Trick song from a web site. Even my 14 year-old can tell you the lyrics to that one. The dude is talking about his mother and father, not "your mother and father". To even cut-n-paste that would be plain stupid. Don't start a thread and then add to it with crap that no one can or should come up with an answer to.

    C) I am not asking you to "help me". I am just asking you to be truthful and cut out the ****. You continually resort to the "I can't help you" line when you are backed into a corner revealing your dishonesty.

    D) I have 9 sets of Polks, I don't need to hear your **** up tweaters to know they sound like ****.

    Once again, A$$hole, post the site you copied it from, or just go away.

    PM From Carl - "Dave,

    I'm not on trial here but since this is so important to you, I'll post the lyrics website on 2 conditions:

    1. You publicly apologize to me for calling me a liar and doubting my integrity and whatever you said in your rambling rage.

    2. You publicly promise to never attempt to antagonize, belittle me or bait me and to never call me names or say anything derogatory to me ever again (this doesn't include disagreeing with me of course but it's a well known fact that you can disagree with someone in a respectful and intelligent manner).

    This bs has to stop. If you hate me that much then put me on ignore or don't open my threads.

    deal or no deal

    carl"

    Very big of you, Carl. If you deisre public, then we'll do public.

    I'll answer each item:
    1) I didn't ramble, I was rather coherent. I am not in a rage over a lyric thread. You have posted several inaccurate lyrics IN YOUR OWN THREAD and I pointed those out. You indicated you cut-n-pasted and I should just basically deal with it. Not sure what you use for a seach engine, but I suggest either Google or Yahoo. You might not find some of this "stuff". I have challenged you to post the links to the inaccurate thread because I suspect you are once again just "stirring the pot" like you do with the insane SL-2000 tweater threads that you inject everywhere. Prove me wrong and then explain why these lyrics differ from the real ones.

    2) I never attempt to antagonize, belittle, or bait you. I have pointed out your dishonesty. If the shoe fits, wear it. If you don't want to be thought of as an antagonist, stop with the "have a nice day, I know I am" crap. If you don't want to be thought of as a liar, clear up your inconsistant postings on the stupid tweater threads. Either you hear the spike, peak, rise, harshness, or whatever, or you don't. Don't post that it doesn't exist, then post how you fixed it and have orgasms when you listen to your screwed up tweaters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • candyliquor35m
    candyliquor35m Posts: 2,267
    edited July 2008
    Sorry this can be handled in pm's.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Demiurge
    Demiurge Posts: 10,874
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    Sorry


    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ZaDIbpTeQI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_ZaDIbpTeQI&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,196
    edited July 2008
    Never mind. Post edited.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    Sorry this can be handled in pm's.

    Why? You asked for some sort of public apology - that makes this public.

    Post the link. No PM needed. You either have it or you don't.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,085
    edited July 2008
    I feel your pain Dave....the reality is that he will never man up. Carl will always twist it to make himself look like the victim and he will never own up to being caught in a lie.

    Best thing is to just put him on ignore.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,204
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    Unless these lines are not from Cheap Trick's Surrender, your lyrics are wrong again.

    The correct lyrics are -
    "... Mommy's alright, Daddy's alright, they just seem a little weird ... "

    Also in the final stanza they insert each of the band members names

    "Ricks alright, Robin's alright, Bune's alright, Tom's alright, we're all alright....we're all alright"

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,085
    edited July 2008
    The thing is, it's obvious what the intent is...and we, myself leading the parade, fall for his schtick hook line and sinker. Arguing or pointing out his inconsistencies is pointless as the 'truth' has no basis in reality for Carl. It's all relative to him and he uses this to drive us nutty.

    He craves any sort of attention that he can get, negative or positive....so the best thing is to just not give it to him.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • mmadden28
    mmadden28 Posts: 4,283
    edited July 2008
    mmadden28 wrote: »
    I even had a hard time searching this one and I know the artist and song
    I'll add more verses if its not guessed.

    There was a Mexican goddess standing at my door
    She said she was Juanita, she just moved next door
    She had a bottle of tequila, a seductive grin
    I said, "Well, now it's party time!" as I let her on in....

    :cool:
    Joe08867 wrote: »
    Nice job, was wondering if anyone else knew the song.

    I think I have heard the one you posted but I don't remember the singer.

    Was it a country guy.

    Nope not a country guy--think 80's and, I wanna say punk metal
    Here's another verse:

    Got to the party, nothing stirring, not even a mouse

    'bout thirty people were there and most of them were dicks
    Only three of them were girls, but they weighed as much as six

    There was a small group of people around talking ****
    About their jobs, pop music and politics
    In the main room, the television was a hit
    I said, "It's sad but true, most people are dicks"
    ____________________
    This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

    HT:Onkyo 805, Emotiva XPA-5, Mitsu 52" 1080p DLP / polkaudio RTi12, CSIa6, FXi3, uPro4K
    2-chnl : Pio DV-46AV (SACD), Dodd ELP, Emotiva XPA-1s, XPA-2, Odyssey Khartago, LSi9, SDA-SRS 2 :cool:, SB Duet, MSB & Monarchy DACs, Yamaha PX3 TT, SAE Tuner...
    Pool: Atrium 60's/45's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Demiurge
    Demiurge Posts: 10,874
    edited July 2008
    candyliquor35m wrote: »
    Sorry

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MArmVcXsPt8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MArmVcXsPt8&hl=en&fs=1&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    Why? You asked for some sort of public apology - that makes this public.

    Post the link. No PM needed. You either have it or you don't.

    Carl PM'd me back offering the same deal for a public apology by me. I will do that if he does the following from my reply to him.

    "Here's my deal, Carl.

    1) Stop antagonizing people with the childish "have a nice day, I know I am..".
    2) Stop injecting your SL-2000 tweeter agrument everytime you get a chance. Even yesterday, before Justin deleted it, you posted in a for sale thread. You had no intention of actually trading the 3000s for them, if you wanted more 2000s, you would just buy them.
    3) Get rid of your antagonistic signature line. It serves no purpose other than to dig at the 99.8% who disagree with your "fix" of the SL-2000 tweeter.
    4) Publicly explain your position on the SL-2000. You either hear the abnomoly, or you don't. You have posted to the effect that it doesn't exist, yet you go on and on and on about your unconventional fix.
    5) Post the links from which you claim you cut-n-pasted the incorrect lyrics to the two songs.
    6) Reveal the mystery song/artist for the "don't ask me no questions" clue.

    Well Carl, deal or no deal?

    Dave"

    Well Carl, deal or no deal? 6 easy steps to the most humbling apology I would ever have to give.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    Carl PM'd me back offering the same deal for a public apology by me. I will do that if he does the following from my reply to him.

    "Here's my deal, Carl.

    1) Stop antagonizing people with the childish "have a nice day, I know I am..".
    2) Stop injecting your SL-2000 tweeter agrument everytime you get a chance. Even yesterday, before Justin deleted it, you posted in a for sale thread. You had no intention of actually trading the 3000s for them, if you wanted more 2000s, you would just buy them.
    3) Get rid of your antagonistic signature line. It serves no purpose other than to dig at the 99.8% who disagree with your "fix" of the SL-2000 tweeter.
    4) Publicly explain your position on the SL-2000. You either hear the abnomoly, or you don't. You have posted to the effect that it doesn't exist, yet you go on and on and on about your unconventional fix.
    5) Post the links from which you claim you cut-n-pasted the incorrect lyrics to the two songs.
    6) Reveal the mystery song/artist for the "don't ask me no questions" clue.

    Well Carl, deal or no deal?

    Dave"

    Well Carl, deal or no deal? 6 easy steps to the most humbling apology I would ever have to give.

    Forget the PMs, Carl. You want a public apology, and in that case, I want to keep it all public.

    Apparantly Carl is not willing to make a deal.

    "dave,

    no deal. evidently you have alterior motives than just wanting to see the link.

    You already made your demand of wanting to see the link and I told you my demands to make that happen. End of story. Now you want to add more demands on top of that. Give me a break.

    It appears you have personal issues (stress, unhappiness, etc) that I can't help you with.

    I would never tell you that your system or your tweaks must sound like crap without hearing them first but that is what you and the other egotistical know it alls are doing on the forum.

    have a good day. I know I'm going to.

    carl"

    Not sure why it has to be a deal to see the link(s) he cut-n-pasted from IN HIS OWN THREAD. His integrety has been called into question and he thinks he needs to parlay some sort of deal in order to clear his name. Personally, I would have the link posted in a minute. Carl, which of the 6 requested items is objectionable to you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DollarDave
    DollarDave Posts: 2,575
    edited July 2008
    DaveMuell wrote: »
    Forget the PMs, Carl. You want a public apology, and in that case, I want to keep it all public.

    Apparantly Carl is not willing to make a deal.

    "dave,

    no deal. evidently you have alterior motives than just wanting to see the link.

    You already made your demand of wanting to see the link and I told you my demands to make that happen. End of story. Now you want to add more demands on top of that. Give me a break.

    It appears you have personal issues (stress, unhappiness, etc) that I can't help you with.

    I would never tell you that your system or your tweaks must sound like crap without hearing them first but that is what you and the other egotistical know it alls are doing on the forum.

    have a good day. I know I'm going to.

    carl"

    Not sure why it has to be a deal to see the link(s) he cut-n-pasted from IN HIS OWN THREAD. His integrety has been called into question and he thinks he needs to parlay some sort of deal in order to clear his name. Personally, I would have the link posted in a minute. Carl, which of the 6 requested items is objectionable to you?

    Carl's latest PM (I am not going to go back and forth via PMs) -
    "Dave,

    this is getting old. All of this could have been discussed in pm's. You have officially joined the bandwagon that is playing games (antagonizing, baiting and name calling) with me in an attempt to get me banned. Sorry I'm not playing.

    Have a good day. I know I'm going to

    carl"

    Carl which of the items do you object to? Not a single one of them should be objectionable to you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
This discussion has been closed.