Signal Sub Cable?

Hi,

I'm interested in hearing from anyone who's using a Signal Cable brand sub cable and your input as to it's performance? I'm currently using a Monster 400 sub cable for one of my subs and coax for the other.

I've recently begun using a Magic Power cord and Analog 2 interconnects for my amp (Rotel RMB-1075) and Ultra speaker cable for my front left, right and center channels. I've been really pleased with the difference they've made so far. I was able to tell immediately the improvement from what I was using before going to the Signal stuff and I'd like to go with the sub cable as well.

I pretty much figure the results will be the same but just wanted to get some feedback from anyone here who started with one brand and then switched to Signal.

Thanks
Post edited by orgthtogod on

Comments

  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited July 2008
    I hate to say it but stick with the MC. I don't think its worth that much thought to worry about it.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • MKZ
    MKZ Posts: 1,068
    edited July 2008
    +1..

    I went that route and didn't make much difference like other changes.
  • Sherardp
    Sherardp Posts: 8,038
    edited July 2008
    dorokusai wrote: »
    I hate to say it but stick with the MC. I don't think its worth that much thought to worry about it.

    though I do agree, I replaced my monster sub cables with signal, sound is not much of a difference, I do think its a better looking cable.
    Shoot the jumper.....................BALLIN.............!!!!!

    Home Theater Pics in the Showcase :cool:

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showcase/view.php?userid=73580
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited July 2008
    I may have had a crappier monster cable but I replaced the cord form my old SVS PB10 with a Blue Jeans Cable and found night and day better results in terms of bass clarity and volume.

    The Signal cable is not much money and in my experience is better than MC and BJC. I would do it. Look at the great results you've had already. If you don't like what you hear, Frank will take it back.
  • millerman 3732
    millerman 3732 Posts: 1,488
    edited July 2008
    SolidSqual wrote: »
    I may have had a crappier monster cable but I replaced the cord form my old SVS PB10 with a Blue Jeans Cable and found night and day better results in terms of bass clarity and volume.

    The Signal cable is not much money and in my experience is better than MC and BJC. I would do it. Look at the great results you've had already. If you don't like what you hear, Frank will take it back.

    Will a new power cord for my SVS really make an audible difference? Wait a minute when you say cord are you talking about power cords?
    Casey
    H/T: Epson 6500ub
    Sony UBP-X800
    Toshiba HD-XA2 (HD-DVD, CD)
    Onkyo 805 (pre-amp)
    Outlaw 7125
    Polk RTi 10 (bi-amped)
    Polk CSi5 (bi-amped)
    Polk RTi6
    SVS PB 12 plus/2
    Velodyne SMS-1

    TV Rig: Samsung 50'' 4k display
    Polk Signa-1 Surround bar
  • daboyz
    daboyz Posts: 5,207
    edited July 2008
    I hated my Monster sub cable,boomy,boomy,boomy. The Signal tightened it up and it is a ton better IMHO.
  • SolidSqual
    SolidSqual Posts: 5,218
    edited July 2008
    Will a new power cord for my SVS really make an audible difference? Wait a minute when you say cord are you talking about power cords?

    I own tons of Signal Cable. In every instance I was dramatically pleased with the results. Whether it's a power cord or a sub interconnect, the Signal Cable will blow away Monster.
  • Frank840
    Frank840 Posts: 262
    edited July 2008
    i had the monster 400 with a y splitter. I also bought a cheap cable that was already split , and the cheaper cable gave me clearer bass. cant comment on the Siginal cables i cant afford them :mad:
    - This your Bush?
    Pioneer Elite Sc-25
    Polk Lsic,15's,9's, PSW1000