Good-Bye Polk Momo, H-E-L-L-O Polk MM!

aaronbang
aaronbang Posts: 5
edited July 2008 in Car Audio & Electronics
I just came across this article at sounddomain
http://blog.sounddomain.com/gadget/2008/01/good-bye-polk-m.html
I was wondering if anyone knows when these are coming out?

dsc_0657.jpg
Post edited by aaronbang on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited June 2008
    If I had to guess, any week now. That pic was taken at CES 6 months ago.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • candaddy
    candaddy Posts: 54
    edited June 2008
    *Snore*

    I'm hoping they end up sounding better than they look..?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited June 2008
    nice big surround, I would think the midbass would be beefy.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thumpin07
    thumpin07 Posts: 217
    edited June 2008
    are these replacing the polk/momo line
    tyler birch

    ht system
    denon avr-1907
    monitor 70 towers-polkaudio
    nakamichi bx -100 tape deck
    sony 5 disc cd/dvd player hdmi ready
    velodyne dps-12 subwoofer

    Car audio

    AMP: FUSION EN-AM8001 800 watts max 368 watts rms x 1 channel @ 2 ohms stable
    SUB: 12 INCH 1000W DVC VOLFENHAG 2 Ohm stable useable ohms 2-8ohms
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited June 2008
    thumpin07 wrote: »
    are these replacing the polk/momo line

    Yes.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Jstas
    Jstas Posts: 14,804
    edited June 2008
    candaddy wrote: »
    *Snore*

    I'm hoping they end up sounding better than they look..?

    You're nuts, they look awesome! Much better than the garish silver/red/yellow color scheme! Kind of a SR Jr. I like it! The grilles look pretty slick too with the silver/black color combo.
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thumpin07
    thumpin07 Posts: 217
    edited June 2008
    will these be better than the sr line
    tyler birch

    ht system
    denon avr-1907
    monitor 70 towers-polkaudio
    nakamichi bx -100 tape deck
    sony 5 disc cd/dvd player hdmi ready
    velodyne dps-12 subwoofer

    Car audio

    AMP: FUSION EN-AM8001 800 watts max 368 watts rms x 1 channel @ 2 ohms stable
    SUB: 12 INCH 1000W DVC VOLFENHAG 2 Ohm stable useable ohms 2-8ohms
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited June 2008
    The SR's are higher up the line....
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Thom
    Thom Posts: 723
    edited June 2008
    In our good/ better/ best line- up, the Mobile Monitor replaces Momo as "better."

    Some pieces are already shipping, and the rest will be pretty soon.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • black magic
    black magic Posts: 669
    edited June 2008
    yeah, they look pretty sweet. I think it might even look a little too much like the SR line. ;)

    That pic looks like a subwoofer. The midrange speakers appear to be the same material as the current Polk/MOMO line - I believe its carbon fiber.
    » Λнмєd «
    "Wtf is juice? I want some grape drink, baby"

    polkaudio FTW!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • candaddy
    candaddy Posts: 54
    edited June 2008
    Jstas wrote: »
    You're nuts, they look awesome! Much better than the garish silver/red/yellow color scheme! Kind of a SR Jr. I like it! The grilles look pretty slick too with the silver/black color combo.

    I like the SR's and I think they look very upscale but the grille on the new MM woofer in the picture looks like some kind of cheap packaging to me. I just don't like it. Between the grille and the fat surround, the cone looks pretty tiny. Otherwise the speaker itself is not exciting at all. I guess from another post the mids are carbon like the Momo's which I do like the look of, so that would be cool. I just don't like the grille. The color combo is OK with me, just not the look.

    I agree that the yellow/red Momo look is kind of garish and only works in some settings, but it was racy. I don't know what these are, but racy or exciting aren't it. At least not for me. I can tell the marketing dept. is going for a different demographic with this one, I guess only the bean counters at Polk will ultimately know if they made the right decision or not. ;)

    BTW I am nuts! :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Thom
    Thom Posts: 723
    edited June 2008
    Yes, that picture is of a subwoofer.

    The cones of the mids aren't carbon fiber, although we showed some pictures like that long ago.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • aaronbang
    aaronbang Posts: 5
    edited June 2008
    When are these going to be available, and where?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited June 2008
    I think they look pretty damn good personally. The grill does look a little cheap but the speaker itself looks sharp. They do resemble the SR's and thats just fine by me as the SR's are gorgeous. Since Im well on my way to making the SR's famous in the SQ lanes (:D ) Im sure itll help the sales of the MM's having them look like my beloved SR's.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • headknocker
    headknocker Posts: 17
    edited July 2008
    Sorry about digging up a one-month+ old thread but I had to comment. I think the grill looks darn nice.

    In fact, I wouldn't mind using them on my Aura MR6.1's as they would compliment my interior nicely.

    I just joined this forum as I'm about to buy a set of Polk MOMO 690's for my wife's Toyota FJ Cruiser. They'll be getting 80 watts from an old US Acoustics USX-2080 that I had lying around.
    '98 CRV
    Kenwood eXcelon KDC-X589 HU
    Aura MR6.1 comps
    Aura MR62 Integrated comps
    Ascendant Audio Arsenal 12
    US Acoustics USX-4065
    PG Octane 8.0:1
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited July 2008
    http://www.crutchfield.com/App/Product/Item/Main.aspx?g=410&i=107MM6501&tp=106&tab=features_and_specs

    Sensitivity is 94db @ 2.83 V? What's that mean? I thought sensitivity was measured at 1 watt/unit distance? Maybe that's only a home audio thing?

    Also, why are they 6.75" speakers as opposed to 6.5? Are most car speakers actually 6.75"?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • exalted512
    exalted512 Posts: 10,735
    edited July 2008
    Where do you see 2.83V?

    Most GMs are 6.75". Other than that, no, most are 6.5s. But with a baffle, which should be done regardless, they'll easily fit in a 6.5 hole.
    -Cody
    Music is like candy, you have to get rid of the rappers to enjoy it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Thom
    Thom Posts: 723
    edited July 2008
    The MM6501 are like the db6501, a slightly oversized cone (6.75"), that fits in a hole that the old 6500 systems would (6.5"). The idea is one speaker that covers both applications. With the benefit of a slightly larger cone, better low- end.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited July 2008
    Sorry. This page says 2.83 v.... http://www.crutchfield.com/App/Product/Item/Main.aspx?g=410&i=107MM6501&tp=106

    Looks cool :) I want them :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Aimen RG
    Aimen RG Posts: 52
    edited July 2008
    p = V^2 / R

    watts = volts square / ohms

    watts = 2.83^2 / 2.7 ( assuming MMs are 2.7 ohms )

    watts = 3

    hence the sensitivity is rated at 3 watts at unit lenght
    Pioneer DEH-1600
    polkaudio db 650
    polkaudio db 675
    polkaudio momo 10"
    KICKER zx650.4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited July 2008
    So would that account for the higher sensitivity rating or are all car speakers rated at 3 watts/unit length?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Aimen RG
    Aimen RG Posts: 52
    edited July 2008
    im not sure about car speakers, most home speakers are 8ohms, and calculating sensitivity at 2.83 volts is the same as 1 watt per unit length in that case.
    i dunno y polk rated MMs at 3watts, atleast that how it looks, someone wanna clearify?
    Pioneer DEH-1600
    polkaudio db 650
    polkaudio db 675
    polkaudio momo 10"
    KICKER zx650.4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mike B.
    Mike B. Posts: 54
    edited July 2008
    For the guys commenting on the "look" of the woofer/Grille. That picture is of the SLA prototype, IE its all plastic, and painted to look like the real deal.... Josh more than likely painted it ...
    Mike Bobelak
    Heartland Regional Manager
    Polk Audio
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter