Totally dumb question
Parachoute
Posts: 88
What is the best way to wire a dvd to a a/v receptor between analog (rca: red, white, yellow), digital (optical), digital (coaxial), analog component vid
Post edited by Parachoute on
Comments
-
Best are optical or coxial. Both are digital audio. HDMI or component cables for video.
engtazengtaz
I love how music can brighten up a bad day. -
My vote is for coax.
-
why not hdmi for sound also?reciever-Yamaha rxv1700
front-RM50t
center-RM30
surrounds-M40
rear surrounds-RM30
velodyne minivee
playstation 3 -
HDMI would equal or exceed digital coax or optical (depending on source), but since the OP did not mention it, I do not know if his DVD or AVR support them.Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms) -
-
Coax for sure. Optical has to go from digital to optical, and from optical to digital. Unless real long runs are necessary coax beats optical in my Sony/Outlaw 990 setup.
BenPlease. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
Thanks
Ben -
+1 for coaxSDA-1C (full mods)
Carver TFM-55
NAD 1130 Pre-amp
Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
The Clamp
Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
Ben's IC's
Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM -
Coax for sure. Optical has to go from digital to optical, and from optical to digital. Unless real long runs are necessary coax beats optical in my Sony/Outlaw 990 setup.
Ben
huh? Optical is digital... If you mean it has to convert from electrical (electrons) to optical (photons), then yes there is a conversion. However, depending on your situation, it may well be better to NOT have an electrical connection between components to keep noise from being introduced and propagated. Now, that doesn't mean it is always the best, as you pointed out that for your the optical out/in on your setup is worse than the Coax. This happens a lot of times because it is expensive to make a quality optical converter, and in the consumer electronics industry, the difference between putting in a quality optical convert could add an additional $50-100, which might be the difference between a over-priced part which does not sell.
Coax is a lot cheaper to produce a quality output, and thus many times will be a much better connection, but it depends on the equipment. If you go out and buy a $1500 DVD player, then you can probably expect that the optical out on it will be a quality optical out, and in terms of sound quality, equal to the coax, with the additional benefit of allowing you to electrically isolate the DVD player from an audio pre-processor.
So in this case, "it depends" is really the best answer. For the most part, you can be sure the coax will have a very good output. If you have the right equipment, your optical connection will also be a very good connection, and will not suffer from electro-magnetic noise that can be introduced into the signal along the wire run, or electrical noise from the DVD player's power supply or pre-processor's/receiver's power supply, as well as keep any ground loops from being introduced by the addition of the DVD player (rare, but it can happen). -
Great response! I had never actually taken into account the shielding issues when you compare optical versus coax. It sounds like optical is another technology that has potential but again, as per customer demand and mass market gear, is never really utilized fully. I mostly stick with coax because I haven't noticed a difference between the two with my setups and coax is much more rugged since you don't have to worry about cracking a cable.
-
Coax sounds better IMO also.
My PC is used as a music server and has a digital coax and a optical out. The coax sounds better by a obvious margin."He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche -
Two arguments for optical are no electrical interference and connecting two components without them being electrically connected (think 60hz hum).
Two arguments for coax are no conversion of signal and cables are more flexible and less fragile. -
When I first start the thread, I thought it was a pretty dumb question. You guys are turning it in a really relevant question. It's great, I'm learning a lot! thanks
-
Yes it's is another cable debate. Wow something new.:D I am sorry, I just get a laugh out of cable debates because of the passion people have about it.
engtazengtaz
I love how music can brighten up a bad day. -
i don't know about sound quality.. but I like coax too.PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin: -
I went with optical for the single reason that I play in that world at work, and there, optical is king (like that matters with this stuff). I've thought about getting a coax cable and seeing if it makes a difference, but I think for most people either would be fine.My equipment sig felt inadequate and deleted itself.