World's most accurate loudspeaker

SlowcarIX
SlowcarIX Posts: 887
edited May 2009 in Speakers
instal12.jpg
my 7.(1x4) HT setup
TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
Front - Emerald Physics CS2
Center - JTR Triple 12LF
Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
Buttkicker

http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
Post edited by SlowcarIX on
«1

Comments

  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited March 2008
    What da hell is it?
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Texas42
    Texas42 Posts: 404
    edited March 2008
    My guess is this is a Dunlavy Audio Labs SC-5
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited March 2008
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • audiobliss
    audiobliss Posts: 12,518
    edited March 2008
    Early B. wrote: »
    What da hell is it?
    And why are those guys trying to steal it?
    Jstas wrote: »
    Simple question. If you had a cool million bucks, what would you do with it?
    Wonder WTF happened to the rest of my money.
    In Use
    PS3, Yamaha CDR-HD1300, Plex, Amazon Fire TV Gen 2
    Pioneer Elite VSX-52, Parasound HCA-1000A
    Klipsch RF-82ii, RC-62ii, RS-42ii, RW-10d
    Epson 8700UB

    In Storage
    [Home Audio]
    Rotel RCD-02, Yamaha KX-W900U, Sony ST-S500ES, Denon DP-7F
    Pro-Ject Phono Box MKII, Parasound P/HP-850, ASL Wave 20 monoblocks
    Klipsch RF-35, RB-51ii

    [Car Audio]
    Pioneer Premier DEH-P860MP, Memphis 16-MCA3004, Boston Acoustic RC520
  • Texas42
    Texas42 Posts: 404
    edited March 2008
    Duntech Sovereign=Dunlavy SC-5, pretty much the same speaker (and same designer, John Dunlavy) although the Sovereign is a bit older. I've auditioned both and they are incredible speakers if you have the room.
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited March 2008
    Texas42 wrote: »
    Duntech Sovereign=Dunlavy SC-5, pretty much the same speaker (and same designer, John Dunlavy) although the Sovereign is a bit older. I've auditioned both and they are incredible speakers if you have the room.

    are they musical?
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • Texas42
    Texas42 Posts: 404
    edited March 2008
    Maybe the most 'lifelike' speakers I've ever heard. Immense soundstage and depth. First heard the Sovereigns around 1988 and was absolutely stunned.
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited March 2008
    audiobliss wrote: »
    And why are those guys trying to steal it?

    lol

    they are having a good workout

    redres10.jpg
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • audiobliss
    audiobliss Posts: 12,518
    edited March 2008
    SlowcarIX wrote: »
    they are having a good workout
    I'd imagine so! Hope they didn't get a hernia! :eek:
    Jstas wrote: »
    Simple question. If you had a cool million bucks, what would you do with it?
    Wonder WTF happened to the rest of my money.
    In Use
    PS3, Yamaha CDR-HD1300, Plex, Amazon Fire TV Gen 2
    Pioneer Elite VSX-52, Parasound HCA-1000A
    Klipsch RF-82ii, RC-62ii, RS-42ii, RW-10d
    Epson 8700UB

    In Storage
    [Home Audio]
    Rotel RCD-02, Yamaha KX-W900U, Sony ST-S500ES, Denon DP-7F
    Pro-Ject Phono Box MKII, Parasound P/HP-850, ASL Wave 20 monoblocks
    Klipsch RF-35, RB-51ii

    [Car Audio]
    Pioneer Premier DEH-P860MP, Memphis 16-MCA3004, Boston Acoustic RC520
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,094
    edited March 2008
    Wait till they bring the sub in!!! Now we're cooking! :)
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • Texas42
    Texas42 Posts: 404
    edited March 2008
    They are 330 lbs....each one!
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited March 2008
    They're still ugly.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • Yashu
    Yashu Posts: 772
    edited March 2008
    Give Genelec a call, maybe you might change your mind. No consumer boutique speaker is going to be better at reproducing the original music than the monitors used for recording the music. I just don't buy it. I certainly believe they are good speakers, but I am 100% sure they were not used for the studio work done on the music you are going to listen to. You want to hear exactly what was meant to be heard, get a studio setup. Anything else is just... It's like the pace car at a race... it's a consumer, street legal car, but it isn't actually *in* the race.

    Now, objectivity aside, perhaps there is a school of thought that some of these boutique speakers are *better* than monitors, and they reveal more, and perhaps that is true, but then you are diving deeper into the sound than the studio techs, so what is down there, you never know. Sometimes you might bring up a treasure, sometimes you might be diving right into murky waters, where things that do not add something positive to the music tend to be revealed. It's a personal choice, almost a gamble, to know that with each record, you may be hearing things that were not intended, without control over it either. The studio tech thought it sounded great, and you play it on your ultra system and hear something weird on the left channel, deep into the mix, something that the tech missed, something that brings fatigue to your ears, or just frustration.
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited March 2008
    the venerable Yamaha NS10M - used by many recording studios for near field monitoring. flat response 60Hz to 20KHz

    yamaha_ns_10m.jpg
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited March 2008
    I'd run out and buy those as fast as I'd run out to buy all the "venerable" studio monitors from JBL.

    See that YASHU? One sentence.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,028
    edited March 2008
    Yashu wrote: »
    Give Genelec a call, maybe you might change your mind. No consumer boutique speaker is going to be better at reproducing the original music than the monitors used for recording the music. I just don't buy it. I certainly believe they are good speakers, but I am 100% sure they were not used for the studio work done on the music you are going to listen to. You want to hear exactly what was meant to be heard, get a studio setup. Anything else is just... It's like the pace car at a race... it's a consumer, street legal car, but it isn't actually *in* the race.

    Now, objectivity aside, perhaps there is a school of thought that some of these boutique speakers are *better* than monitors, and they reveal more, and perhaps that is true, but then you are diving deeper into the sound than the studio techs, so what is down there, you never know. Sometimes you might bring up a treasure, sometimes you might be diving right into murky waters, where things that do not add something positive to the music tend to be revealed. It's a personal choice, almost a gamble, to know that with each record, you may be hearing things that were not intended, without control over it either. The studio tech thought it sounded great, and you play it on your ultra system and hear something weird on the left channel, deep into the mix, something that the tech missed, something that brings fatigue to your ears, or just frustration.

    You give " studio tech's " way too much credit.After all,is it not with studio recordings these days that most of us have a problem with? " diving for treasure"..."murky waters"..? Is this not what the studio is suppose to differentiate? Instead of this mass marketed congested crap you get on the majority of todays recordings? Why does high end gear piss you off so much?
    Is it not when money is no object,innovation can happen?Though I can agree all live music doesn't sound good when sitting in the seats,but there has to be something said for reproducing the strings on a violin,the throaty Sax,or a kick drum that hits you in the chest,in your own living room.To me,that is where the studio tech's,of late,have missed the mark.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 34,054
    edited March 2008
    The NS-10s are notoriously unflat but were a precisely known quantity to engineers.
    Indeed, they are nasty sounding speakers. The "tissue paper mod" is legendary.
    http://studioforums.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3756015614/m/5106009124/inc/1
    http://studioforums.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/739109386/m/6981071981

    EDIT: Perhaps, on reflection, the earlier post (#17) on the NS-10 was irony...
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited March 2008
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 34,054
    edited March 2008
    That's the 10m, with XO modified to alleviate the need for tissue. Still a well calibrated but bad sounding speaker. Note the 5dB rise smack dab in the MR.

    For fun, you can compare Matthew Polk's claimed FR for the original versions of the Model 7 and 10, ca. 1976.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=3051
  • aisha
    aisha Posts: 3
    edited May 2008
    Nothing posted about the Duntech Sovereign 2001's for a while but I read the entry by Yashu and had to register and reply. Sorry for the length and I hope this doesn’t come across as dribble.

    My passion for music and essentially sound reproduction found me working for a company called Duntech in Adelaide, South Australia, AUSTRALIA, back in 1986. Yes, I used to assemble these amazing speakers at the factory in little old Adelaide when John Dunlavy ran things down here.

    Firstly these are just one of many of the awesome pieces of engineering to come out of the human mind; secondly they are exceptionally neutral as are many high end components. Yes many carry some sort of characteristic that means that people prefer one unit to another, under blind testing for example, but they were designed to be as neutral as possible.

    I have heard these in the sound room that was designed to house them at the factory and they were powered by a Rowland Research Mono-block and pre-amp combo with one of those, now very dated Philips CD-100? players, as a source.

    Their ability to reproduce a recording was astounding. I sat just outside the sound room and listened to many a demonstration, as I hand assembled the massive cross-overs, and the sound was very convincing. I always have and always will compare it to sitting outside the doors of a concert hall, jazz club and in fact pretty much any venue where I have heard live music. I know there is better out there now but honestly these units should be respected.

    As for the "no speaker is going to do better...." comment, well I don't want to get personal, as audio reproduction is a very subjective world, as each persons perception of the sound can be different, but please, this is music reproduction and not music production.

    If you want to hear what the engineering produced, as the Engineer wanted it intrinsically heard, then go to the studio put on his ears and fill your skull with his brain put yourself into the issues that filled his life professionally, personally etc at the time and listen your little heart out.

    Music is created and maybe, at the time, recorded. The more pure and neutral that recording and the more pure and neutral the reproduction, which includes the room it is reproduced in, then more likely you will experience the performance as it was intended.

    Enjoy your music with what you have and for what it is. If you don’t like your system then change it so you do, if you don’t like the music then put something else on. One day you will want to put that disk you took off your turntable or out of your optical drive, back on and listen to it again.

    This has nothing to do with studios or engineering it is all you. The gear just makes it more enjoyable if you are open to the enjoyment.

    Keep thinking…

    Happy listening.
    It's not where you draw the line but how thick your pencil is that really matters.
  • mightymouse
    mightymouse Posts: 254
    edited May 2008
    Amazing speakers.

    Dunlavy is out of business. Is Duntech still around? Can you still purchase these speakers brand new?
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited May 2008
    You guys still have Krix Bros. speakers down there? I got a demo in Darwin/1991, of a small pair of Krix Bros. that were a two-way with 2 x 4" woofs and dome tweet in the woofer over/under the tweeter configuration. It was a fairly large showroom, and they were being driven by MA Electronics pre/power (200wpc) combo, also made in Australia I believe.

    One of the dumb things I have done audio-wise in my career, was not to buy those speakers at $400 pair back then. You cannot believe how much incredible sound came out of those tiny boxes. I actually looked behind the preamo to see if there was a line going out to another amp or subwoofer back there. Nope. Absolutely astonishing. When I got back to the base, the next day I realized the dining hall was completely outfitted with Krix Bros.
  • aisha
    aisha Posts: 3
    edited May 2008
    Mightymouse - Yes there is a web page and they apparently still exist http://www.duntech.com.au/. I think you can order them from that page? I am not sure how much they cost though? They used to be AUS $18,000 a pair back then in 1986 so I expect they would cost a little more than that these days.

    Main problem here was that these speakers didn't fit into most people's homes they were simply too big to install properly and people with the money and the space would often build a room for them. Money well spent I say :-)

    What you can still buy is the B&W 800 series speakers and at the time, 1986, these were the speakers that John Dunlavy spoke as a competitor in the market. He didn't care about the massive Polks and the Infinity Reference monoliths that they were, he only worried about the B&W's. These days there are so many options in that area of the market he would be tearing his hair out. To quite frank his manufacturing processes at the time would cost him a fortune today to maintain also. It was a very manual process at the time and I personally hand built the first piano black pair of Sovereigns which was an honour to a 16 year audio nut. Yes I wore cotton gloves and worked with caution to build this stunning looking pair of speakers which were off to some other country and some lucky owner.

    George Grand -
    The Krix Speakers are still around and yes I have been a frequent visitor to their factory since the mid 80's as well. Hey, when you love speakers and you have these guys at your doorstep then why not. :-)

    As a side Adelaide (pop 1.5 mill) houses Krix, Sonique and Vaf who all design and manufacture loudspeakers?

    As for the Brix, well yes that model you speak of was a D’Appolito array using some 4 inch mid bass drivers and managed to get a useable 50Hz out of them , quite impressive for the time. I have to say I am very found of the D'Appolito configuration, it was central to the design of many of the Duntech speakers for example the PCL3, PCL5, PCL1000 & PCL2001 and along with the time alignment (designed for a 4 metre listening position on the 1000's and 2001's) provided an amazing sound stage.

    As for finding them tucked away in corners, hallways and rooms in buildings, well yes I think this is common place. The company is doing very well with its International sales in that regard as they also do many movie theatres.

    In this day and age I wonder about how long they will be around. They manufacture a very good product out of a factory here is Adelaide and have grown from such small beginnings (like many successfull companies) to be something quite impressive for a local company. However, with off-shore manufacturing out there they must be finding it hard to compete with the likes of JBL for example, who they often win contracts over for large cinema complexes. Further to this, people here, as I expect is similar to the US, are installing projectors and sound systems into dedicated rooms in their homes!

    Three years ago most people didn't know what a home theatre was and perhaps 7 years ago people didn't know what a sub-woofer was. Now people always want a sub and if they are building a home ask the sales person if the design includes or can include a home theatre. This is surely the demise of the cinema complex and this is a large portion of the Krix market I think?

    Anyway I am rambling about stuff that isn't directly related to the original post so I shall stop. I can't help myself, it is something I am very passionate about and I guess it sits close to my heart :-)

    Enjoy
    It's not where you draw the line but how thick your pencil is that really matters.
  • SlowcarIX
    SlowcarIX Posts: 887
    edited May 2008
    i saw the towards 2000 documentary (i was in singapore then) many years ago when a...iirc put a music professor infront of a musician and a pair of Sovereign - he could not tell them apart :)
    my 7.(1x4) HT setup
    TV - Mitsubishi WD-65734
    AVP / Amp - Onkyo PR-SC885P / D-Sonic 2500-7
    Front - Emerald Physics CS2
    Center - JTR Triple 12LF
    Surround L/R / Back - Polk RTi4 / Polk FXi A4
    Sub - 4 X Hsu ULS15 playing nearfield
    DVD / CDP - Sony PS3/40GB / Sony SCD-XA9000ES
    Belkin PURE AV PF60 / UPS
    Buttkicker

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60612
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited May 2008
    SlowcarIX wrote: »
    i saw the towards 2000 documentary (i was in singapore then) many years ago when a...iirc put a music professor infront of a musician and a pair of Sovereign - he could not tell them apart :)



    Who was the 330 lb.. 7 ft tall musician?;)
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • mightymouse
    mightymouse Posts: 254
    edited May 2008
    Thanks Aisha for the info.

    At one time I was looking to purchase a pair of Dunlavy's. But by the time I had the funds, Dunlavy went out of business. It's good to hear that Duntech is still in business. It is rare to hear from someone who has actually built these speakers. Thanks man!


    You brought up the B&W 800 series. Now the top of the line B&W series is the 800D series with the diamond tweeters. In your opinion, how would the current B&W 800D stack up against this Duntech?

    aisha wrote: »
    Mightymouse - Yes there is a web page and they apparently still exist http://www.duntech.com.au/. I think you can order them from that page? I am not sure how much they cost though? They used to be AUS $18,000 a pair back then in 1986 so I expect they would cost a little more than that these days.

    What you can still buy is the B&W 800 series speakers and at the time, 1986, these were the speakers that John Dunlavy spoke as a competitor in the market. He didn't care about the massive Polks and the Infinity Reference monoliths that they were, he only worried about the B&W's. These days there are so many options in that area of the market he would be tearing his hair out. To quite frank his manufacturing processes at the time would cost him a fortune today to maintain also. It was a very manual process at the time and I personally hand built the first piano black pair of Sovereigns which was an honour to a 16 year audio nut. Yes I wore cotton gloves and worked with caution to build this stunning looking pair of speakers which were off to some other country and some lucky owner.
  • jdhdiggs
    jdhdiggs Posts: 4,305
    edited May 2008
    Sorry for the late reply but I wanted to comment on Yashu's statement:

    My brother owns and runs his own professional recording studio (as well as being a professional musician) and the "finishing" speakers that they use is a POS ghetto blaster and that's what they try to get it to sound good on since that's the quality of speaker system most people listen to it on. So if you want to hear what they hear when doing final mixing, go spend $50 at Wally world. This is why most recordings suck, their made for bad car audio and cheap home stereo and that's how it's mixed....

    They do have other professional studio monitors and, based on his comparison to my maggies, he thinks their monitors don't reproduce anything close to the lifelike sound I get from my system. Just relaying thoughts from someone who is a pro in the business.
    There is no genuine justice in any scheme of feeding and coddling the loafer whose only ponderable energies are devoted wholly to reproduction. Nine-tenths of the rights he bellows for are really privileges and he does nothing to deserve them. We not only acquired a vast population of morons, we have inculcated all morons, old or young, with the doctrine that the decent and industrious people of the country are bound to support them for all time.-Menkin
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,028
    edited May 2008
    I think you'll find the speakers,or other related gear varies alot between recording studio's. Some do mix it to be played on crappy auto or home systems like JD has said,and thats a shame.Others use top notch gear with the intent of mixing for the best possible sound regardless.Seems to me,a crappy recording will sound even more so on a good system,but a good recording will still sound decent on a bad one.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,028
    edited May 2008
    Amazing speakers.

    Dunlavy is out of business. Is Duntech still around? Can you still purchase these speakers brand new?

    I think there is a set on audiogon now for 5 g's.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's