The UGLY amp.....

treitz3
treitz3 Posts: 19,029
edited January 2009 in 2 Channel Audio
500blue.jpg

OK, now this has got to be one of the ugliest amps I have ever seen. :eek: Really, for 12K I would expect something that is aesthetically pleasing like the stingray, but THIS?

I'd still like to hear it. :D BTW, who has the most powerful tube amp on the forum? ..............Beauller...........Beauller..........Beauller? Just curious.
~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
Post edited by treitz3 on
«1

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,561
    edited March 2008
    I like it. It's got that industrial, "Neo-Classic Design" look down pretty well. ;)
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited March 2008
    It looks like something that belongs in a tank.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,561
    edited March 2008
    LOL......more like a laboratory.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • obieone
    obieone Posts: 5,077
    edited March 2008
    "This is Alpha 3 bravo to base, alpha 3 bravo to base. Our position is being overrun by ugly audio components"
    I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!
  • analog97
    analog97 Posts: 328
    edited March 2008
    I think that Manley amp is beautiful. Love to hear 500 tube watts push my 1.2 TL's. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited March 2008
    The aesthetics of that amp work for me. All the Manley stuff shares a certain pseudo-industrial look (including the Stingray).

    Indeed, I wouldn't mind having a pair of 'em... for what they are, they're not even that expensive.
  • BaggedLancer
    BaggedLancer Posts: 6,371
    edited March 2008
    I wouldn't mind having a pair either bought with mhardy's money.
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited March 2008
    analog97 wrote: »
    Love to hear 500 tube watts push my......
    THAT's where the real beauty lies.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited March 2008
    treitz3 wrote: »
    THAT's where the real beauty lies.

    Shut up Tom.....:D. If I had the coin, I'd like to give 'em a try. It's what's inside that counts.


    and I'd like to read the specs....;)
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited March 2008
    * ALL-TUBE monoblock design 10 x KT90EH Electro-Harmonix Russian output tubes
    * High current double 6414W GE driver stage
    * 12AT7EH large plate Electro-Harmonix Russian input tube
    * BALANCED & UNBALANCED inputs
    * MUTE switch
    * TRIODE / TETRODE switching
    * SOFT-START/ EVER-WARM standby mode
    * MANLEY Precision output transformer
    * Factory set for 5 ohms nominal
    * Front panel bias measurement and adjust (hiding under the black insert)
    * Large filter / reservoir capacitors 3800uF x 2
    * Angled rear of chassis provides for easy connections
    * WBT binding posts
    * Input sensitivity: 1V
    * Gain: 32dB tetrode; 30dB in triode
    * Input Impedance RCA: 116 Kohm @ 1KHz
    * Input Impedance XLR: 270Kohm @ 1KHz; 20Kohms @ 20KHz; 38Kohm @ 20Hz
    * S/N Ratio: -80 dB
    * Dynamic Range: 96dB
    * FLAT frequency response: 10 Hz - 30 KHz continuous
    * Power Consumption: 30 Watts in "EVER-WARM"
    * Full power (tetrode): 500W
    * Full power (triode): 275W
    * Factory set for 100V, 120V or 220-240VAC operation for original destination country's mains voltage.
    * Operating Mains Voltage changeable with power transformer re-wiring and fuse value change.
    * Mains Voltage Frequency: 50~ 60Hz
    * Dims: W=19", D=13", H=9"
    * Shipping weight: 82 lbs. each
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited March 2008
    OK...but how would it sound? hmmmmm
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited March 2008
    I'd like to hear this head to head with the Silver Sevens. ;)
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited March 2008
    I'm surprised they're only 82lbs.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • lightman1
    lightman1 Posts: 10,788
    edited March 2008
    Face wrote: »
    I'm surprised they're only 82lbs.

    Super-secret, space-age Manley weight saving technology is my guess.
    They look like they could do the job though..
  • venomclan
    venomclan Posts: 2,467
    edited March 2008
    But that is a mans amp. No girly men amps here.
  • Yashu
    Yashu Posts: 772
    edited March 2008
    Can't you read? It says right there on the front "Neo Classical Design"... I mean come on... who wouldn't shell out 12 grand for that?!?! I tried to write those words on my NAD amps with a sharpy and it just doesn't have the same feel... I definitely would have paid 20X more for those words so boldly emblazoned on the front bezel.

    But seriously... I am willing to bet the sound makes you forget about what it looks like. Just turn the lights off... pretend you are making love to some fugly girl you met at a bar, but she makes you feel so good that you forget for a second she is built like a brick shithouse... put a bag over her head and she don't care, she wants to be told how f'ing ugly she is... she gets off to it.

    So, after dropping 12 Gs on that thing, promptly throw it on the ground and tell her she is an ugly ho, and plug her in and listen to her sing, you might forget.
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited March 2008
    Good, I was hoping you would chime in.

    That's it. 4 knuckleheads in one evening? I'm hittin' the date with the pillow early. Peace all.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • Yashu
    Yashu Posts: 772
    edited March 2008
    Just more there to love, Treitz.
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited March 2008
    venomclan wrote: »
    But that is a mans amp. No girly men amps here.

    More like a Manley amp... too bad EveAnna's a woman...
  • janmike
    janmike Posts: 6,146
    edited March 2008
    With bluejean covered speakers you would have a match.
    Michael ;)
    In the beginning, all knowledge was new!

    NORTH of 60°
  • strider
    strider Posts: 2,568
    edited March 2008
    Here's your chance, guys. Just up on the 'gon.

    Remember, the ugly ones have to perform in order to justify their existence...
    Wristwatch--->Crisco
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,646
    edited March 2008
    That is one fugly amp.

    I dont care how it sounds.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • sb_caribou
    sb_caribou Posts: 32
    edited March 2008
    even at 6.5, its gotta look better than that...
  • nadams
    nadams Posts: 5,877
    edited March 2008
    Zero wrote: »
    It looks like an AC unit.

    But I bet it functions quite the opposite. I would imagine it's quite the space heater!
    Ludicrous gibs!
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited March 2008
    I would rub my dingus on that.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
    edited March 2008
    I would rub your dingus on that.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited March 2008
    stop being such a tease
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • mulveling
    mulveling Posts: 505
    edited March 2008
    I like the look, a lot. Bet it would look totally hot with tubes a'glowin.
    Tannoy Dimension TD10, SOTA Star Sapphire, Heathkit W4A's, McIntosh MC2100, Eddie-Current Zana Deux, Singlepower SDS, Sennheiser HD650, Audio-Technica L3000, Sony Qualia 010
  • shadowofnight
    shadowofnight Posts: 2,735
    edited March 2008
    I dont know, looking at that amp made me think of a little tune from AC/DC called " She's got balls " :D
    The first rule of Fight Club is you don't talk about Fight Club
  • John in MA
    John in MA Posts: 1,010
    edited March 2008
    I usually can tolerate fairly odd looking audio components, and still I think that's on the ugly side. Wouldn't kick it out of bed, though, as the saying goes. But it wouldn't win any beauty contests.

    My idea of a good looking power amp is a flat face, rack handles, and big meters. McInotsh MC500, for example.

    mc-mc500.jpg

    TroyD wrote: »
    I would rub my dingus on that.

    BDT
    RuSsMaN wrote: »
    I would rub your dingus on that.

    If either of you get near me, you're both going home sans-dingus.