How do I improve channel separation?
ShinAce
Posts: 1,194
I've got a 2 way active crossover that I am testing, and a thought occured to me.
I have 2 ways to feed the signals to both amps. Both amps are identical models(80 WRMS / channel).
1) Dedicate one amp to the woofers. Dedicate the second amp to the tweeters.
2) Dedicate one amp per stereo channel(ie, one amp per speaker). Use left input on the amp for bass and the right input for treble.
I was assuming to connect everything as in 1). Now I'm thinking 2) might be a better option because the left channel of the amp will handle bass only and the right channel will be used for treble only. This way, each channel is essentially playing different frequencies.
Would this improve channel separation, in theory?
I have 2 ways to feed the signals to both amps. Both amps are identical models(80 WRMS / channel).
1) Dedicate one amp to the woofers. Dedicate the second amp to the tweeters.
2) Dedicate one amp per stereo channel(ie, one amp per speaker). Use left input on the amp for bass and the right input for treble.
I was assuming to connect everything as in 1). Now I'm thinking 2) might be a better option because the left channel of the amp will handle bass only and the right channel will be used for treble only. This way, each channel is essentially playing different frequencies.
Would this improve channel separation, in theory?
Post edited by ShinAce on
Comments
-
Just a thought, but I would use one amp for bass and the other amp for treble. For the simple fact that if there is any slight difference in sound between the 2 amps, everything in the same Freq, will be even.
Since no 2 amp are exactly identical, bass from one amp might not be the same as bass from another, same goes with treble. So thats my reasoning for using the same amp for the same freq. Of corse the 2 channels in the amp might be different as well, the odds are more likely that 2 seperate amps would be even more different.
I hope I explained my self ok.Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
ShinAce, are the two amps identical?~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
-
Probably from different production batches(bought 8 months apart), but identical make and model. Audiosource amp one/A.
The speaker mismatch is almost guaranteed to trump any amp mismatches.
Resume discussion... -
The speaker mismatch is almost guaranteed to trump any amp mismatches.
Resume discussion...
Speaker mismatch?? Your using different speakers?Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
The speaker mismatch is almost guaranteed to trump any amp mismatches.
Anyhoo, I would vertically bi-amp them I have tried all of the combinations on various setups and this was the best for me - end result. The biggest improvement for stereo separation besides the source and format was for me, the speaker cables, specifically AQ CV-8's w/ 72v bat pack.~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~ -
Don't forget about the preamp either! Signals can get intermixed in there just as easily as any amp.Lovin that music year after year.
Main 2 Channel System
Polk SDA-1B,
Promitheus Audio TVC SE,
Rotel RB-980BX,
OPPO DV-970HD,
Lite Audio DAC AH,
IXOS XHA305 Interconnects
Computer Rig
Polk SDA CRS+,
Creek Audio 5350 SE,
Morrow Audio MA1 Interconnect,
HRT Music Streamer II -
Nope, same speakers. They're DIY.
I got started in this hobby by testing, designing, building, and retesting speakers. I can tell you up front that 2 'identical' drivers that even sound the same in an A/B test can have specs varing by more than 25%. Good luck finding 2 identical amps with that much variation.
Just by making note of the fact that I'm getting rid of the passive crossovers in favor of active, shows that I'm focused on eliminating any source of imbalance.
I've got all the tools needed to properly set reference levels and such.
Another thought that occured to me is that if I dedicate one amp per speaker, I might have problems if the amp clips. If the woofer's channel clips, I want to keep the harmonics as far away from my tweeters as possible.
I'll probably go standard hookup, or 1).
Treitz: I'm not clear on what you mean by vertically bi-amp. -
ShinAce wrote:I'll probably go standard hookup, or 1).~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
-
#2 makes the most sense to me for two reasons. 1. Obvious seperation between left and right. 2. Transformer power sharing. (whichever channel on each amp that needs more power from the supply can get it if the other channel is not requiring it).
madmax
PS: You can place each amp right next to the speaker which shortens the speaker cable. Better to be longer on the interconnect and shorter on the speaker cable.Vinyl, the final frontier...
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... -
#2 makes the most sense to me for two reasons. 1. Obvious seperation between left and right. 2. Transformer power sharing. (whichever channel on each amp that needs more power from the supply can get it if the other channel is not requiring it).
madmax
PS: You can place each amp right next to the speaker which shortens the speaker cable. Better to be longer on the interconnect and shorter on the speaker cable.
Basicly treating them as monoblocks..
I understand your logic.Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Specs are everything when you have to DIY.
Specs first, trial and error after. But I do concur.
Max: I hadn't thought of your second point. Hmm. *adds it to the list of pros/cons* However, the amp is very capable of 200 watts bridged to 8 ohms. Since I am running 8 ohm per channel, I will run out of voltage before current. It will clip before it sags. -
However, the amp is very capable of 200 watts bridged to 8 ohms. Since I am running 8 ohm per channel, I will run out of voltage before current. It will clip before it sags.
This is true at 8 ohms. Its good to see someone who knows their system this well.
madmaxVinyl, the final frontier...
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...