Ipod sound quality

Road Runner
Road Runner Posts: 106
edited March 2008 in 2 Channel Audio
I've been reading stuff that says that Ipods are some of the worst sources that can be used for any system - clearly worse than CD - and I'm trying to figure out if it's true. Based on everything I can piece together, it seems like they're about as good a source as you can get provided that a lossless format is being used for the music. And even then, a lossy format can still be used, it just has to be a lossy format that doesn't make any audible difference. The only thing that seems to make it a worse source is that some models may have an amplifier that doesn't have a flat frequency response but even that could theoretically could be taken care of with some EQ controls. I think the reason why so many people love to bash them is because usually the headphones that are used with them are pretty weak, but that doesn't matter if you're hooking them up to your stereo.
Post edited by Road Runner on

Comments

  • AudioFilet
    AudioFilet Posts: 235
    edited February 2008
    The 4th & 5th generation Ipods have the best sound, due to the high quality Wolfson DAC used. But there are still problems with it. If you want the best possible sound from your Ipod, make it an Imod, send it to these guys:

    http://www.redwineaudio.com/iMod.html
    2 Channel rig:
    LSi9"s (modified xover's) & HSU Sub
    Harman Kardon HK 990 Amp
    Onkyo C-S5VL SACD
    Music Hall MMF 5.1
    Furman Elite 15

    HT rig:
    HK AVR-745 & Polk Monitor Series
  • Road Runner
    Road Runner Posts: 106
    edited February 2008
    If they claim it does all this, then that sounds like baloney:
    Tighter, more articulate bass (not necessarily more bass quantity… but much improved bass control and definition)

    A richer, more seductive midrange

    A less flat and more expansive imaging (the soundstage needs to open up and become more 3D… more wide, more deep, and with a better sense of height in recordings that offer this level of resolution).

    Improved transients/dynamics

    More detail retrieval and overall transparency

    Superior treble extension and sweetness, as well as better decay of long held notes and delicate harmonics
  • AudioFilet
    AudioFilet Posts: 235
    edited February 2008
    Yeah, that there sounds like a bunch of marketing hype. I would be willing to bet there would be some improvement though. Especially when using a set of high end monitors, like the Shure line of IEM's.
    2 Channel rig:
    LSi9"s (modified xover's) & HSU Sub
    Harman Kardon HK 990 Amp
    Onkyo C-S5VL SACD
    Music Hall MMF 5.1
    Furman Elite 15

    HT rig:
    HK AVR-745 & Polk Monitor Series
  • phuz
    phuz Posts: 2,372
    edited February 2008
    If they claim it does all this, then that sounds like baloney:

    You might be suprised with what a few caps and an opamp can do.
  • Road Runner
    Road Runner Posts: 106
    edited March 2008
    Here's something from Wikipedia about the lack of bass:
    The third generation iPod had a weak bass response, as shown in audio tests. The combination of the undersized DC-blocking capacitors and the typical low-impedance of most consumer headphones form a high-pass filter, which attenuates the low-frequency bass output. Similar capacitors were used in the fourth generation iPods. The problem is reduced when using high-impedance headphones and is completely masked when driving high-impedance (line level) loads, such as an external headphone amplifier. The first generation iPod shuffle uses a dual-transistor output stage[citation needed] rather than a single capacitor-coupled output, and does not exhibit reduced bass response for any load.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod