SR6500 Amp Questions

ZRide
ZRide Posts: 9
edited February 2008 in Speakers
I am planning an SQ system and just placed an order for a pair of SR6500's matched up with an Alpine 4.100 AMP.

I was just wondering if running the Alpine PDX 4.100 bi-amped to the SR6500's would be sufficient or if I should go with the 4.150 instead.

The 4.100 sends 100W RMS while the 4.150 send 150W RMS.

Would it be better to power the SR6500's bi-amped with 100W or 150W?

I just want to be sure I don't overpower or underpower the components.


Thanks.
Post edited by ZRide on

Comments

  • ilikesound
    ilikesound Posts: 355
    edited February 2008
    posting in the car forum will yield better results.

    for your answer, though, as long as you set your gain correctly, there won't be too much of a difference audio-wise. I always go for more headroom, just to have it, but it really depends on your budget. i would sure bi-amp them, though...you would be losing SQ if you didn't. some say it doesn't matter, but i've found that, in most cases if you have a good ear bi-amping improves the soundstage a little bit more than not bi-amping.

    in conclusion, i bi-amp my focal set with around 96w, and they sound fabulous, and get super loud. 100w is plenty, and you won't have to worry about blowing them, or underpowering.
    At Home:
    Panasonic 42'' TC-L42U12 LCD
    Pioneer VSX-80TXV
    Toshiba HD-XA2
    Sony PS3 - psn "metalguitars"
    Xbox 360 - gamertag "giggidygiggidy"
    Panamax 4300EX
    Polk RTi8's
    Polk CSi3's
    Polk FXi3's. (x2)
    Martin Logan Dynamo (x2)
    Audioquest interconnects and wires.

    Away From Home:
    JVC HDR-50
    stock system in new car for now:(
  • ShinAce
    ShinAce Posts: 1,194
    edited February 2008
    +1

    100 watts will do you fine.