Physics Homework -
Serendipity
Posts: 6,975
Sorry to bother you guys, but I have this homework question that I'm stumped on:
"You're 1.5m from a charge distribution whose size is much less than 1m. You measure an electric field strength of 282N/C. You move to a distance of 2.0m, and the field strength becomes 119N/C. What is the net charge of the distribution?"
I was trying to find out a way to calculate the charge, but I'm not sure where to go with this. All I understand is that the electric field decreases with distance?? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
"You're 1.5m from a charge distribution whose size is much less than 1m. You measure an electric field strength of 282N/C. You move to a distance of 2.0m, and the field strength becomes 119N/C. What is the net charge of the distribution?"
I was trying to find out a way to calculate the charge, but I'm not sure where to go with this. All I understand is that the electric field decreases with distance?? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good!
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good!
Post edited by Serendipity on
Comments
-
The answer is C. Statistically C is the correct answer 80% of the time.
-
I hate physics....if you don't know the answer damn it...CHEAT!!!HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
42 -Its the answer to everything!There is no genuine justice in any scheme of feeding and coddling the loafer whose only ponderable energies are devoted wholly to reproduction. Nine-tenths of the rights he bellows for are really privileges and he does nothing to deserve them. We not only acquired a vast population of morons, we have inculcated all morons, old or young, with the doctrine that the decent and industrious people of the country are bound to support them for all time.-Menkin
-
i get 807.44n/c
A 42% increase ever .5m you move closer.
But I could be wrongMonitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Looks more like Russ's booze level on a Friday night.:pHT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
i get 807.44n/c
A 42% increase ever .5m you move closer.
But I could be wrong
How did you get that? I'm less interested in the answer, more interested in understanding the problem.
As I said before I was trying to calculate the charge, but there must be an easier way...polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good! -
How did you get that? I'm less interested in the answer, more interested in understanding the problem.
As I said before I was trying to calculate the charge, but there must be an easier way...
Ok . You have the measurement between 2.0m (119) and 1.5m (282). 119 devided by 282 is .42
42% is the increase every .5m you get closer.
Now go from 1.5m to 1.0 and add 42%
Now go from 1.0m to .5. and add 42%
now go from .5m to 0m and again add 42%
a charge is constant, it does not change. so an increase between 2.0m and 1.5m is the same as the increase between .5m and 0m. So the % of increase or decrease never changes.Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
BaggedLancer wrote: »The answer is C. Statistically C is the correct answer 80% of the time.
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time. -
They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.
60% is an F.
But 100% of 60% of the time is pretty good.Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Ok . You have the measurement between 2.0m (119) and 1.5m (282). 119 devided by 282 is .42
42% is the increase every .5m you get closer.
Now go from 1.5m to 1.0 and add 42%
Now go from 1.0m to .5. and add 42%
now go from .5m to 0m and again add 42%
a charge is constant, it does not change. so an increase between 2.0m and 1.5m is the same as the increase between .5m and 0m. So the % of increase or decrease never changes.
Okay, cool! I was getting nowhere when trying to calculate the charge, but then after you explained I realized the charge is constant and you can solve it your way.
Thanks!polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good! -
-
Or I could be completely wrong and it could be something like this.
http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1360/25ElPot/Continu.htmlMonitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
I think I am competely wrong at this equation, I must look like an idiot...lolMonitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Nah, I don't get it either...polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good! -
So what is it? Did you figure it out? What equation are you using?Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
So what is it? Did you figure it out? What equation are you using?
I thought I was close, but you can say that I didn't figure it out yet.polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good! -
I understand.
Is there something missing from your question? A charge distribution less than 1m? Thats it? Is it an atom? What formula are you using? I wish I could help.. Good luckMonitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
This sounds like a Physics 208 problem (electromagnetism, charges, electricity, etc). Couldn't you use point charge formulas? I threw away all my notes from last semester so I can't really help you too much
-
Inside the field is always zero.
Maybe this..
sigma=-qd/[r^2+_d^2]^{3/2}
Dont ask me....I read somewhere about using an image charge..Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
This sounds like a Physics 208 problem (electromagnetism, charges, electricity, etc). Couldn't you use point charge formulas? I threw away all my notes from last semester so I can't really help you too much
I'm not sure if I could use point charge formulas in this case???
Anyways, the question in the first post is the entire question.polkaudio RT35 Bookshelves
polkaudio 255c-RT Inwalls
polkaudio DSWPro550WI
polkaudio XRT12 XM Tuner
polkaudio RM6750 5.1
Front projection, 2 channel, car audio... life is good!