Polk rti & Yamaha

bignorm
bignorm Posts: 120
Hello
quick question
I have the Yamaha RX-V1300 receiver with a selectable ohm switch. I currently have the switch set to 8 ohms.
Is this correct as I noticed the Rti series CSi series FX series
all indicate "4 ohms nominal" on their spec sheets.

The Yamaha other ohm switch setting is a combination of different
ohms (not sure but something like 4 ohms front 6 ohms rear etc)

Thanks for the help!!!!!
Eliab/Dave Abrams calibrated Panny
Yamaha,Denon,Toshiba "in the rack"
Polks all around
SVS on the floor
Post edited by bignorm on

Comments

  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited November 2002
    NORM!

    I believe that all of your speaks are 8 ohm, I'd say set it at 8 and let 'em rip.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • bignorm
    bignorm Posts: 120
    edited November 2002
    Are you sure?

    The owners manual for the RTi FXi and the CSi all indicate
    "4 ohms nominal"
    Eliab/Dave Abrams calibrated Panny
    Yamaha,Denon,Toshiba "in the rack"
    Polks all around
    SVS on the floor
  • fireshoes
    fireshoes Posts: 3,167
    edited November 2002
    The online manual shows 8 ohm. That's what I've always ran mine at anyway.
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited November 2002
    NOOOOOOOOOOOORM!

    The are designed to be used with HT receivers which most are designed to deal best with 8 ohm loads. Check with customer service, though, they may be able to shed a little more light though.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • bignorm
    bignorm Posts: 120
    edited November 2002
    Thanks all
    I checked online and my speakers are all 8 ohms
    must have incorrect manuals
    Eliab/Dave Abrams calibrated Panny
    Yamaha,Denon,Toshiba "in the rack"
    Polks all around
    SVS on the floor
  • smazzurco
    smazzurco Posts: 4
    edited November 2002
    It's amazing how documentation, in a field where technical setup and calibration play such a significant role in a hobby (regardless of vendor), can be consistently lacking. Guess that's why we have forums.